What is the Church's position on the Intersexed and Transsexed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zoe_Brain
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I just want to ask this question and hope I’m not abusing the thread with a redundant post.

Is the church’s current position about authentic sexual ambiguity limited to what the body presents outwardly or is it just what the body presents whether outwardly visible or not?
 
Benedam,

Might I direct you to the first two pages this thread. The topic of the intersexed/transgendered has not been extensively dealt with by the Church, except for one document issued secretly to bishops back in 2003 which stated as far as we can tell:

“The Vatican text defines transsexualism as a psychic disorder of those whose genetic makeup and physical characteristics are unambiguously of one sex but who feel that they belong to the opposite sex.”

This is the Catholic technical definition that we have been working with. Given that the definition requires both genetic makeup AND physical characteristics to be “unambiguous” for this definition to apply, they do not address situations where the genetics, the physical characteristics, or both, are ambiguous.
 
Perhaps I will forever avoid the finality of an appointment with the loaded version by following through the transitional therapy medicine has brought to this moment in my life. Oh, and yes, I have met preliminarily with the surgeon who will help me bring body in accord with my brain.
If you need someone to talk to - PM me, OK? I am constitutionally unable to tolerate someone I care about finding a “permanent solution to a temporary problem”.

You would not be the only person I’ve helped who knows what gun-oil tastes like. Or even the tenth. All have gone on to lead successful lives, and often to help others, because they’ve been there too.

Hugs, Zoe
 
Benedam,

Might I direct you to the first two pages this thread. The topic of the intersexed/transgendered has not been extensively dealt with by the Church, except for one document issued secretly to bishops back in 2003 which stated as far as we can tell:

“The Vatican text defines transsexualism as a psychic disorder of those whose genetic makeup and physical characteristics are unambiguously of one sex but who feel that they belong to the opposite sex.”

This is the Catholic technical definition that we have been working with. Given that the definition requires both genetic makeup AND physical characteristics to be “unambiguous” for this definition to apply, they do not address situations where the genetics, the physical characteristics, or both, are ambiguous.
Thank you Gretta.
I’ve read the beginning of this thread and I remember that definition now. Senior moment.

Ambiguous physical characteristics seems to imply the appearance thereof either being female or male.
But I’m sure there are physical characteristics that cause ambiguity that are not physical indicators of sex.

I wonder how the Church is defining ‘physical characteristics’.
 
it seems to me that if you are medically “intersexed” that by definition your gender is ambiguous. Applying another canonical maxim, “you are not bound to the impossible”, you can only clarify your gender as much as it is possible to do so, using the best available information you have at that time. Neither God nor the Church can require you to do more than that.

The Church has made a pronouncement that it does not want people who clearly are of one gender to change to another because it is considered mutilation. …consider that the Pope when he speaking …is making pronouncements that are meant to be applied to 99% of his people.
Benadam, this issue has not been treated substantially by the Church yet, but could definitely say something on the subject as it continues to unfold. It seems that they first want to have a fuller understanding of these medical conditions versus those thus far perceived as mere confusion. It wouldn’t be wise to make a statement without knowing both sides of the story. In Zoe’s case, having a medical condition would certainly seem to qualify as ambiguous.

I’m saddened to see so much hatred lobbed at those who are different, especially those who call themselves christians and ESPECIALLY those calling themselves “catholics”. I see a lot of confusion when it comes to certain issues people disagree with. Just because you’re against an issue doesn’t mean you should be against the person, especially not attacking or being hateful. Our treatment should be no different between those who are white, latino, gay, blue, or whatever. We’re still all people, and brothers and sisters in Christ.

With abortion already targeting so many types of “different” children (down syndrome among other genetic defects), imagine if they could locate those babies who were going to be intersexed. So then we’d get rid of them too because it’s “not natural”? What a sad state of affairs that would be.

And Zoe, know that I too am praying for you and your family (especially your son, as you said).
 
I see a lot of confusion when it comes to certain issues people disagree with. Just because you’re against an issue doesn’t mean you should be against the person, especially not attacking or being hateful.
Liraco, thanks for this gentle reminder. I’ve sometimes been less than charitable at times, and need to work harder on that. I fall so far short of who I’d like to be, but fortunately people here are very forgiving of that.

Thanks for the prayers too. I’ll soon be facing the issue of my son’s puberty, and what he decides to do regarding surgical cosmesis. His genital reconstruction, while not as radical as mine, was radical enough, and we opted for both reduced-risk and full-functionality rather than cosmetic appearance. He may wish to have some work done there, when he’s older.

They grow up so soon… kids date at 12 nowadays. And I’m told that the majority aren’t virgins by the time they’re 20. Rather different from my background at that age.

Hugs, Zoe
 
Benadam, this issue has not been treated substantially by the Church yet, but could definitely say something on the subject as it continues to unfold. It seems that they first want to have a fuller understanding of these medical conditions versus those thus far perceived as mere confusion. It wouldn’t be wise to make a statement without knowing both sides of the story. In Zoe’s case, having a medical condition would certainly seem to qualify as ambiguous.

I’m saddened to see so much hatred lobbed at those who are different, especially those who call themselves christians and ESPECIALLY those calling themselves “catholics”. I see a lot of confusion when it comes to certain issues people disagree with. Just because you’re against an issue doesn’t mean you should be against the person, especially not attacking or being hateful. Our treatment should be no different between those who are white, latino, gay, blue, or whatever. We’re still all people, and brothers and sisters in Christ.

With abortion already targeting so many types of “different” children (down syndrome among other genetic defects), imagine if they could locate those babies who were going to be intersexed. So then we’d get rid of them too because it’s “not natural”? What a sad state of affairs that would be.

And Zoe, know that I too am praying for you and your family (especially your son, as you said).
I’m relieved. I am particularly endeared to people suffering from an intersexed and transexed condition. They are the earth’s expression of disharmony between men and women. Through them the extent of loss becomes realized. For an only man his masculinity remains hidden to himself untill it is revealed by the only womans feminity. With the internal gaze of Original Innocense they are naked to one another and there was no ambiguity manifest and no cause for shame.

I don’t know if this holds true but… It seems the more ambiguity is physiological the less a person acts like a fundy with cause.
Zoe, I read how you feel about your prayers and so I feel obligated to mention that forgiveness adds power to prayer and you have a committment to forgiving in an environment rich with opportunity. You just may have a fortune stored up waiting for your intentions.
 
I don’t know that the Church has an official position on either but I would say that those who are intersexed should live a chaste and celibate life. I would also say that transsexism is disordered just like homosexuality is.
 
I don’t know that the Church has an official position on either but I would say that those who are intersexed should live a chaste and celibate life. I would also say that transsexism is disordered just like homosexuality is.
Holly, I really have to ask, if you “don’t know that the Church has an official position” on this subject, why in the world would you jump in here and give us this “opinion”:confused:
People just seem to continually pass judgement and express opinions on things they have no knowledge about.

This thread has been going on for months and there is a wealth of information available for anyone to become familiar with the subject.

Also, people should get their your own houses in order before passing judgement. Unlike others, those of us who have taken corrective measures, DO NOT feel guilt over our actions as it is the “right thing” for us to do.

Thank you,
Rachel

BTW, TS is not about sex.🙂
 
@Holly: Hyflyer64 is right, the issue at hand is not about sex, but what the Church teaches on the matter.

Leading a chaste and celibate life is certainly something that applies to a lot of people, not just the kind described here, not just people struggling with homosexuality, but MOST people, period. Not everyone is called to marriage (just like not just anyone should be priest in our Church). It’s a serious commitment that many take lightly these days, just like sex itself. I’ll stop there as I’m already getting way off-topic.


Zoe, I seemed to have missed quite a bit of the conversation as I didn’t know about your son needing to go through surgery for that (is that in this thread? Cuz I don’t want people having to repeat themselves). More prayin’ comin’ right up!
 
You just may have a fortune stored up waiting for your intentions.
Can I transfer the balance to someone who needs it more than I do? Forget who’s owed what, or who deserves what, I see so very many in need, and I can help so few. Not that I’m not in need too, as we all are.

This isn’t a matter of Religion so much as a matter of Balance, what the Buddhists call “Karma”.

I’m in the fortunate position of having had rather more on my plate than many, but not so much as many others. Enough to sensitise me to their needs, while not having to spend all my time dealing with my own issues.

Only those relatively well off, as I am, have the luxury of being able to think of others much. OK, I’m below the poverty line, but I don’t have cancer, my son doesn’t have spina bifida, I’m not homeless etc. The fact that I even have a son puts me light years ahead in riches compared to couples who can’t have children. It’s only in material wealth that I’m below par compared to many. But compared to those in East Timor, or most of Africa, I’m rich there too.
 
Zoe, I seemed to have missed quite a bit of the conversation as I didn’t know about your son needing to go through surgery for that (is that in this thread? Cuz I don’t want people having to repeat themselves). More prayin’ comin’ right up!
I’m not sure whether I mentioned it or not. He was born Intersexed, and required genital reconstruction early in life to relieve pain and enable him to urinate properly.

He’s a normal little boy - no sign of transsexuality (THANK YOU GOD). But if he’d been a girl in a mostly male body, we would have given him - or rather her - whatever support we could.

After the op, he looks almost normal. Things work, there was no nerve damage. Had things been a little more severe though, he would have been one of those children that the surgeons recommend get surgically assigned as female. Which would have made him transsexual, as he’s very obviously a boy. That happens in about a third of such cases, which is why Intersex organisations work so hard to have this practice ended. You wait till age 5 or 7, until the child can tell us what gender they are, before surgically intervening. The only exception is minimal surgery to relieve pain, ensure excretory function, and prevent imminent (rather than long-term) cancer risks.

I’m open about my own condition, but rather more circumspect about my son’s, for obvious reasons.

And people ask me why I consider myself so lucky. Things are so much worse for so very many I know. Women who were assigned male, men who were assigned female, and all now bearing the stigma of “mental illness” because the surgeons got it wrong. The Church condemns such practices, but soto vocce, without much conviction, as regardless of how the child feels about themselves afterwards, afterwards the patients conform in appearance to either a male or female norm. They’re no longer social or theological embarrassments. Catholic hospitals that absolutely refuse to allow adults to correct the surgeons’ mistakes still countenance surgery on newborns who don’t look normal. Some even insist on it - though that’s more common in Baptist run ones. That was one area where Dr McHugh got it right - he just didn’t see the corollary. That gender is not always correlated with external appearance at birth.

Hence cases like that of David Reimer. I deal with those all the time in peer support groups. Perhaps 1 in 10 of “transsexual” people had this happen to them. See the post on my blog, Square Peg, Round Hole.
 
I’m not sure whether I mentioned it or not. He was born Intersexed, and required genital reconstruction early in life to relieve pain and enable him to urinate properly.

He’s a normal little boy - no sign of transsexuality (THANK YOU GOD). But if he’d been a girl in a mostly male body, we would have given him - or rather her - whatever support we could.

After the op, he looks almost normal. Things work, there was no nerve damage. Had things been a little more severe though, he would have been one of those children that the surgeons recommend get surgically assigned as female. Which would have made him transsexual, as he’s very obviously a boy. That happens in about a third of such cases, which is why Intersex organisations work so hard to have this practice ended. You wait till age 5 or 7, until the child can tell us what gender they are, before surgically intervening. The only exception is minimal surgery to relieve pain, ensure excretory function, and prevent imminent (rather than long-term) cancer risks.

I’m open about my own condition, but rather more circumspect about my son’s, for obvious reasons.

And people ask me why I consider myself so lucky. Things are so much worse for so very many I know. Women who were assigned male, men who were assigned female, and all now bearing the stigma of “mental illness” because the surgeons got it wrong. The Church condemns such practices, but soto vocce, without much conviction, as regardless of how the child feels about themselves afterwards, afterwards the patients conform in appearance to either a male or female norm. They’re no longer social or theological embarrassments. Catholic hospitals that absolutely refuse to allow adults to correct the surgeons’ mistakes still countenance surgery on newborns who don’t look normal. Some even insist on it - though that’s more common in Baptist run ones. That was one area where Dr McHugh got it right - he just didn’t see the corollary. That gender is not always correlated with external appearance at birth.

Hence cases like that of David Reimer. I deal with those all the time in peer support groups. Perhaps 1 in 10 of “transsexual” people had this happen to them. See the post on my blog, Square Peg, Round Hole.
Makes me wonder about my birth.
 
You have accused people of committing evil. You have accused others of a masquerade. No, you don’t get a pass on this one. This is not merely a philosophical debate, where such woolly thinking is acceptable, you have made accusations of evildoing.

Justify them or be guilty of bearing false witness.
It’s been a while since I’ve been here, so I’ve forgotten of what you’re accusing me. However, you are wrong about the “bearing false witness” thing: That means where you intentionally lie about something. It does not mean “you say something that wasn’t true”. It means being a false witness, i.e. “I saw this thing happen” when you know you didn’t: it refers to intentionally lying.
I’m not asking for a justification that I’d agree with, You’ve already stated that scientific facts are irrelevant to your case. I’m asking for a solid scriptural basis other than your personal opinion. Actually, I’m demanding one, or an apology for hasty words.

Why am I being so blunt - not my accustomed tone, and which goes against the grain? Because views like yours have been used to excuse the killing of people like me. The last time by one Allen Ray Andrade, recently found guilty of murder in the first degree for using a fire extinguisher to repeatedly bludgeon an 18 year old girl’s head until her skull shattered, and it became concave.

This was the first time such an excuse was not accepted in 32 years. The last time a conviction for pre-meditated murder of someone like me was deemed murder in the first degree was in 1977, because of views like yours.
That’s garbage, dude. My views do not support murder. I understand you’re upset, but you’re not taking it out on me, although that was months ago… I guess that’s why I left: I didn’t want to waste time with a frivolous argument. And, since I don’t recall what the argument was, I guess I’m done with it.

Skimming past pages seventeen and nineteen, I saw some discussion of children suffering from gender identity disorder (i.e. transsexuality) and I hope it’s clear that they need mental and physical therapy (i.e. hormone study and therapy to what their body needs, like how the Pope Paul VI Institute manages fertility problems), not “support” for a “sex transition”. (From a physical, medical perspective, we must work with the body to correct what is wrong, not artifically hijack everything, as with the birth control pill and sex mutilation surgery.) It is obvious from the natural law and Catholic theology, but I fear it may not seen by some here. (I did not read the posts in depth, and I really don’t want another frivolous argument.)
 
It’s been a while since I’ve been here, so I’ve forgotten of what you’re accusing me. However, you are wrong about the “bearing false witness” thing: That means where you intentionally lie about something. It does not mean “you say something that wasn’t true”. It means being a false witness, i.e. “I saw this thing happen” when you know you didn’t: it refers to intentionally lying.
That’s garbage, dude. My views do not support murder. I understand you’re upset, but you’re not taking it out on me (although that was months ago… I guess that’s why I left: I didn’t want to waste time with a frivolous argument.)
Ah yes the same attitude of my father who wants the 800s Cathoic church back. You even said science doesn’t matter which puts your credibility in the toilet quickly. It’s attitudes like yours that wrongly put Galleo in prison, locked up other like autistics amungst others. Shame shame>
 
It’s been a while since I’ve been here, so I’ve forgotten of what you’re accusing me. However, you are wrong about the “bearing false witness” thing: That means where you intentionally lie about something. It does not mean “you say something that wasn’t true”. It means being a false witness, i.e. “I saw this thing happen” when you know you didn’t: it refers to intentionally lying.
That’s garbage, dude. My views do not support murder. I understand you’re upset, but you’re not taking it out on me, although that was months ago… I guess that’s why I left: I didn’t want to waste time with a frivolous argument. And, since I don’t recall what the argument was, I guess I’m done with it.

Skimming past pages seventeen and nineteen, I saw some discussion of children suffering from gender identity disorder (i.e. transsexuality) and I hope it’s clear that they need mental and physical therapy, not “support” for a “sex transition”. It is obvious from the natural law and Catholic theology, but I fear it may not seen by some here. (I did not read the posts in depth, and I really don’t want another frivolous argument.)
How dare you call this subject frivolous. I hope you are not in a occupation that involves working with children, you would be an obvious danger to all the non physical aspects of child health.
 
You even said science doesn’t matter
Wait – WHAT?! I’m getting a Bachelors of Science in Physics next year – precisely what did I say? (I may have said that bad science doesn’t matter – citing dozens of studies that are more politically oriented than scientifically oriented, for example. If I recall, that was the context.)
It’s attitudes like yours that wrongly put Galleo in prison, locked up other like autistics amungst others. Shame shame>
First of all, shame on you. Secondly, read: catholic.com/library/Galileo_Controversy.asp Do not come across as an ignorant anti-papist.
 
How dare you call this subject frivolous. I hope you are not in a occupation that involves working with children, you would be an obvious danger to all the non physical aspects of child health.
I’m really not in a good mood, and your posts are not helping. You are not reading my posts carefully, and you are missing their context entirely. The argument to which I referred was the one with Brain who attempted to accuse me of “bearing false witness” due to a misunderstanding of the phrase.
 
hyflyer, I think Elizabeth would be happier if you would place quotations from her posts in quote tags (highlight the text and click the dialog bubble in the post editor), instead of bold/red formatting. (The bold and red may come across as in The Scarlet Letter, “It’s bold and red because it’s wrong.”)

As for male and female, when looking at the Genesis story, we have Adam and Eve, man and woman. In a sense, it’s like you’re asking me to define the colors blue and yellow. It’s hard to define, but you know it when you see it. Don’t overanalyze reality, trying to force everything to fit square definitions. It leads one into endless spirals; what is the difference between sanity and insanity, reality and illusion, belief and faith? Life is complicated, but don’t overcomplicate it! 🙂 Ultimately, scientific definitions are irrelevant (God and his creation exist without man’s thoughts); we are called to love God and our neighbors, and to life everlasting.
Read it for your self, you are saying science is irrelevent. I rest my case.
 
I’m really not in a good mood, and your posts are not helping. You are not reading my posts carefully, and you are missing their context entirely. The argument to which I referred was the one with Brain who attempted to accuse me of “bearing false witness” due to a misunderstanding of the phrase.
I’m supposed to grin and bear it, being transsexual, but I’m supposed to be worried about your mood. Now that has double standard written all over it. Zoe is one of the most mild mannered posters here is upset over your whole condescending attitude here. I think you have got to come to term with the fact that some us are sick and tired of being told to grit are teeth and bear it when it comes to gender issues. By the way don’t question my knowledge of science. I’m a degreed meteorologist, who happens to have big hobby with studieng history. We all know Galleo was put in jail for propsing the Earth is not the center of the Universe. Later Copernicus made the same proposal, but in a more diplomatic way to the Pope and it was accepted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top