H
historyb
Guest
The problem here is you seem narrowly focused. Look around you and see that “the spirit of V2” was nothing good for the Church. I am a convert and when I went to the Catholic Church it was no different than any Protestant Service that I have been too. There was nothing distinctively Catholic about the service and there always should be.But that is the point I am trying to make. How can we KNOW that we are worse off with V2?
Do we not believe in the infalliability of the Pope? Do we not trust that our Cardinals and Bishops saw or knew things that the congregations didn’t?
Why would they willfully take actions to undermine the Church? Clearly the Second Vatican Council was formed to ACT on things that were going awry within the Church.
As an example, I can’t imagine how forcing the faithful to adhere to Mass in Latin over the last 40 years would INCREASE the numbers of the faithful. But on this forum, on a daily basis, I read threads and posts that literally claim that a return to Mass in Latin would bring people in the US to the CC by the droves.
I can only trust in the Pope, and believe that those in the Second Vatican Council were/are far smarter and more learned than I ever could be.
I converted in spite of that, in fact I did my homework and was so shocked with what I saw that I almost walked back out and remained a Protestant, after all they now resembled each other. Even my Dad when he was still alive ask me if this was a Catholic Church when he went with me. The changes away from V2 are good, Tradition needs to have it’s place back, it has gotten to Protestant. Maybe not by the mere fact of V2, but by the “spirit of V2” of course if you think Barney Masses, Clown Masses, Gay Masses and all the rest are ok just ignore us and go to a different part here. Just don’t give us this story about nothing being wrong.