A
agapewolf
Guest
50 years ago, there wasn’t as much of a relativistic culture. 50 years ago, parents taught their children about faith and brought them to Mass. Teens are not going to mass. Families are not going. (of course there are some, but the majority are missing)So what’s my point? While I think the so called life-teen masses might draw in young people, I don’t think we should have such masses. I think they generally have a negative effect on the people. I would much more prefer good education and thus making sure that by the time a child grows up, they will understand all about mass, the importance of it and the reason why masses are not a social gathering of people to generally have a good time (well, they should have a good time but for an entirely different reason).
50 years ago we didn’t need life-teen masses, why do we need them now?
or did they? How do you know you didn’t need them? What if you did have them? How many more vocations would we have? How many more faithful families might we have? I don’t know…just a thought.
THeir parents aren’t going either. I have seen youth Masses bring teens back who then brought the rest of their families/parents back.What will make more younger people come to Mass?
How about their parents?
.
I’m sorry that is your experience. It definately is not mine, nor the way Lifeteen trains its youth ministers to be. They push orthodoxy, obedience, and substantial teaching. The lifeteens in my area (and I know in AZ and many other areas) teach strong catechesis.I’ve been to LIFE Masses and LIFE nights. . However, the teachings are generally very weak, which makes them just like every other teaching being done today in the Church.