G
Godmachine
Guest
You’ve certainly provided it. Thank you.The Godmachine needed more entertainment! :yup:
You’ve certainly provided it. Thank you.The Godmachine needed more entertainment! :yup:
ok, 'i’ll let the jury go with that.Umm…is that your argument? If so I rest my case.![]()
You can’t possibly do that. You’d lose both your vocation and your identity. :ehh:the Jesus was a myth thing went out with the Edsel.![]()
Well I already know how a Catholic jury would decide. It’s been fun. Peace be with you.ok, 'i’ll let the jury go with that.
Sure I can. I don’t care what you think of me. Thanks for the chuckles.You can’t possibly do that. You’d lose both your vocation and your identity. :ehh:
everyone one agree that Jesus existed. the evidence? for another thread.Well I already know how a Catholic jury would decide. It’s been fun. Peace be with you.![]()
:hey_bud: You’re the manufacturer!The Godmachine needed more entertainment! :yup:
I’m only a spectator.![]()
I’m only going by the information you’ve provided…You can’t possibly do that. You’d lose both your vocation and your identity. :ehh:What more can I do?
Sorry, I don’t see any evidence.c’mon Godsmachine.
ample evidence for God. even more for Jesus. and more for the CC being His church.
No. If you want to pin the atheist label on me that is fine. But I think I am better qualified to decide which label fits me best.if you’re agnostic, why live like an atheist? try the other side for a year and live like a Catholic.
fair, no?
no, i said you’re agnostic.Sorry, I don’t see any evidence.
No. If you want to pin the atheist label on me that is fine. But I think I am better qualified to decide which label fits me best.
Correction! According to Godmachine “Godsmachine” is wishful thinking.c’mon Godsmachine…
You also said I live like an atheist (something you could not possibly know). No matter. I don’t care.no, i said you’re agnostic.
Perhaps he does. You haven’t. Thanks again. Good night.as for evidence for God/ Jesus i think william lane craig presents good evidence for both.
An unusual username usually represents to some extent the beliefs of its author…You can’t possibly do that. You’d lose both your vocation and your identity. :ehh:
A genuinely philosophical discussion is not concerned with authors but their beliefs… or with their claim to have no beliefs…
i said why live like an atheist generically, didn’t mean you did. sorry if i wasn’t clear.You also said I live like an atheist (something you could not possibly know). No matter. I don’t care.
Perhaps he does. You haven’t. Thanks again. Good night.
I’m wondering how generic agnostics live. In exactly the same way as atheists? Or do they pray on the off-chance they may be heard? I doubt it!i said why live like an atheist generically, didn’t mean you did. sorry if i wasn’t clear.
I’m sure the vast majority of agnostics never even consider the possibility that God exists from one month - or even year - to the next! How often in our secular society do believers think about God?imeant that i don’t know any agnostics that live religiously.most live secular lives.
that might a good other thread.
I’m sure the vast majority of agnostics never even consider the possibility that God exists from one month - or even year - to the next! How often in our secular society do believers think about God?
During the 20th century prior to 1990, the popularity of Christianity had been stable in the U.S. About 87% of adults identified themselves as Christians. The country then experienced a major change. Significant numbers of American adults began to disaffiliate themselves from Christianity and from other organized religions. By 2008, the percentage of Christians had reached 76% and is believed to be continuing its decline.
The former-Christians do not seem to have joined new religious movements (NRMs) or other world religions; they mostly left organized religion entirely and became secularists.
So yes, people are starting to wake up a bit, to think criticaly about faith. That may be why such a larger protion now simply consider themselves “spiritual, not religious.”Since World War II, this same process had been observed in other countries, like the U.K., other European countries, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.
The main difference might be that fewer would have anthropomorphized and politicized God due to an unfortunate misunderstandig of mysitcal language translated by mystically unexperienced translators and theologians and preached by the same, as a general rule. What might have taken the place such misunderstanding? Maybe something less devolved into fear based worship* of a diety constructed so to mask actual relationship. So all the consequent suppression of individuals might have lessened as well. Perhaps what was the original inspiration of our Church might have had greater sway, but in better translated and understood guideances. In any case, we wouldnot have to be dealiing with th rampant personaization tha we are faced with today, unless one of its other forms had its sway instead. Being how we are, tha might have happened, and we would simply have another form of it. But things are improving.Religion? culture? history? morallity? etc.
What do you think the world would be like?
What would be different?