But that isn’t true is it because we are always advocating for physical solutions to spiritual problems ie. Abortion, gay marriage.Why do you ask this, instead of what to do about the manifestation of evil in the human heart? You cannot legislate the devil out of existence. The spiritual cannot be bound by the physical. While only human to look for physical solutions to spiritual problems, it cannot be the solution.
The majority of tragedies have some sort of pre-indicator. Normally what happens after is not knee jerk, emotion-driven responses. It’s common sense and safety driven responses. That’s how we have so many rules with cars and on the road. They usually develop as responses to accidents or deliberate misuse.This tragedy had numerous pre-indicators - all of which were ignored. Every such tragedy has these indicators. The knee jerk, emotion-driven response is to pass new laws! Send troops door-to-door to gather the weapons up! Where has this occurred historically and how did it work out? Students of history recall that this occurred in totalitarian nations where evil then triumphed at a national - then world wide level.
Is this what is desired?
There are lots of religious and community organisations who are doing just that. Trying to rescue these troubled youth from going down the wrong path. The problem is that they can’t force counselling or treatment on anyone. If you resort to sectioning every troubled youth before they go down a bad path, that’s a can of worms that obviously can’t work. The police can only use the law to force treatment after they’ve committed a crime. How would you propose rounding up and treating every troubled youth?The time to prevent this was before it happened. This young man had a rather horrible childhood and slowly developed a seething rage. He was rapidly deteriorating and nothing was done. Allow this to continue unabated and tragedy inevitably ensues. See this? It’s NOT a booking photo. Ramos had no criminal history. He was spinning out of control for some time and NOTHING was done.
Texas had already moved on making schools secure but gave a pittance to schools to do it. Larger schools just couldn’t make it work. On top of that, few teachers wanted to tote guns. US Gun lovers don’t get that. They just don’t get that ordinary people would rather not kill anyone else outside a war zone. It’s not in the nature of gentle folk.The school could have/should have locked doors! Such tragedies are known and in all such cases, predictability is preventability. My wife points out that in Europe and Latin America, schools and even convents are locked - have been for decades. Why?
Evil exists.
Oh come on. After 9/11 the whole world changed its attitude to air travel and as a result the use of aircraft as weapons of mass destruction has been eliminated. We had done a lot of air travel before that time but after 9/11 even here in Australia for years subsequent my husband was pulled aside for special treatment. He’s a mild mannered Italian but looks middle Eastern. At first it was a bit embarrassing but then it became a laugh to recount each time. He didn’t kick up a stink about his ‘rights’ because well ‘the common good’. Something that doesn’t seem very important to gun lovers in the US.Guns? Did we blame Boeing for 9/11? Airbus? Those aircraft were the last in a long process of evil planning. Remember that passengers were not allowed control of aircraft. There was “plane control.” Did not work. The time for prevention was during the formative stages of the evil plan. Practically speaking, I have lived around firearms my entire life. So has virtually everyone I know. None of us has ever gone on a mass murder spree. Why is that?
Because we are not murderers! And THAT is the problem. Murderers always find a way. Should we ban jet airliners because of 9/11? No, because they have greater value. And so it is with firearms. Aside from being a bulwark of freedom, they PREVENT or DETER thousands of crimes yearly. Oh, but the media does not report that, as it does not fit their agenda.
I simply don’t believe the propaganda that making guns freely available under the justification of self defense outside an official war zone, leads to better safety for everyone. It’s proved untrue outside the US and it’s a cop out line inside the US where anyone that doesn’t want to tote a gun is left out in the cold. Gun advocates have no interest in a 2nd Amendment style militia to protect the common good. They just want guns for themselves as their right. It is as plain as the nose on your face that the common good is not at the heart of the modern translation of the 2nd Amendment anymore.You would take this away, leading to a defenseless population that exists in fear of the criminal element? More crime of all types, including women raped and killed?
Catholics all over the world are doing just that. I’m asking what about the concrete measures that can keep people safe and alive today.Q: What is it that you seek?
How about praying and laboring for a change of hearts?
The situation of this young man with all his “obvious” troubles was no different from thousands of other young men who also had not yet been charged with a felony. If we were supposed to take proactive steps limiting his freedom before last Tuesday then we would have to take such limiting action against thousands of others who are indistinguishable from him. It is always easy to say after the fact “He was a ticking time bomb. I knew he was going to do something like this.” It is much harder to actually predict it beforehand for a specific individual and take action that limits his freedom to do things like buy a military-style weapon. If you try that you will run into big problems from the powerful NRA.This tragedy had numerous pre-indicators - all of which were ignored.
…
The time to prevent this was before it happened. This young man had a rather horrible childhood and slowly developed a seething rage. He was rapidly deteriorating and nothing was done.
“Breitbart”! There’s an authoritative unbiased source to reference, right?
They are. An overwhelming majority of Americans are in favor of strengthened background checks. But the power of the NRA to dominate legislation prevents any meaningful reform.Rather, why not let Americans decide?
This is an assumption that runs contrary to evidence. Yes, it’s that pesky Harvard study you continue to ignore.Pertinence aside, I disagree with your reasoning. I abhor what will be the result. More violence and death.
“You cannot get rid of abortion. You cannot.”You cannot get rid of guns. You cannot.
You mean significant gun control legislation has failed to pass every time it has been tried because of concerted opposition from the NRA and gun manufacturers.Gun control has ultimately failed every time it has been tried.
Interesting that you should bring up Mexico, which has a gun problem because of the flood of guns from the US. We created the chaos is Mexico.weapons will flood in via Mexico…
Because it reduces the number of guns for everyone, including the not-so-peaceful, or potentially not-so-peaceful.Do you really think that disarming the peaceful will help them? How?
False assumption with no basis in fact.The criminal will always be armed.
Two points. The NRA and their apologists like Breitbart are constantly falsifying the Australian gun control data to feed their propaganda. It seems that some people just gullibly believe them and don’t bother to ask or research because Australia is constantly correcting them for the record. Read here…Your Australian! How did forced disarmament work there?
https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amend...s-confiscation-scheme-fails-disarm-criminals/
Rather, why not let Americans decide? Q: Are you blasting Putin over the killing of Ukrainian children? No? Kindly explain why not. A whole lot more than 19 have died.
You never addressed the points I made in my last post. You’re just saying the same things again.You cannot get rid of guns. You cannot. Time and money is far better spent on mental health, counseling, good parenting, fostering intact families and holding small-time deviants and criminals accountable before they become big-time criminals. Leave the DNA of the USA alone and work on what works. Gun control has ultimately failed every time it has been tried. Do you honestly think it will work this time? Isn’t that the logical fallacy of wishful thinking? We need results.
I can’t make head nor tail of that analogy. If the cancer is the massacre of children and innocents and guns are the reason, isn’t the more sensible treatment to reduce exposure to the cause?I love your passion, but I cannot disagree more with the reasoning. Would you take Tylenol for cancer? Treating symptoms is a fail. Guns are a symptom. I’ve had three cancers, so I have skin in that game.
The Australian who killed 50 NZers at two Mosques a couple of years ago, went to NZ because he couldn’t get the type of guns he wanted in Australia.Do you really think that disarming the peaceful will help them? How? The criminal will always be armed. The criminal will steal from the military - and has. He or she will buy on the international arms market and truck them across the open US border. Gun control thus becomes malignant, disarming the victim. Who runs the streets then?
Laws work everyday. As I said in my previous post. Laws regarding air travel have eliminated 9/11 type hijackings. Laws regarding cars and car use mean everyone is safer on the road. What other bit of equipment on the planet is treated like an untouchable idol than US guns? The children sacrificed at the altar of the gun will be beacon of shame in the light of history.You believe everything in your post? You believe that it will magically happen by the utterly simplistic method of yet another law? Where has that ever worked?
The article I posted was a response to the NRA’s continual false narrative regarding Australia’s gun laws. Why can’t the Australian people correct that? Are we to be ‘cancelled’ and just shut up in the face of those false claims? Are the NRA beyond all judgment from anyone? Are they divine or God Himself?I’m a life NRA member - and those who hate it are ignorant. They know nothing of what they judge - judge!!! - and condemn the organization which trains police and civilians and presses for more punishment for those committing violent crime.
I sure hate the ignorance, but that is a fact of modern life.
We do not hate the NRA. We hate the lies they tell and the corruption in 1977 when the previously honorable organization devoted to gun safety and marksmanship was taken over by the current militant band of extremists. I hope the NRA will some day return to its roots and once again become the respectable organization they once were.I’m a life NRA member - and those who hate it are ignorant.
Right back at you.I do not believe your thoughts are truly your own.
You are mistaken if you think God has decreed that all people have unfettered access to AR-15s. The right to self-defense (which is a God-given right) is the right to act when attacked. It is not a right to stockpile weapons. It is not in the Catechism. In fact the US Bishops have supported gun control.but you seem to have latched on to a radical political ideology which works against the rights we have from God.
We already do. But most gun deaths are caused by law-abiding people. They were law-abiding anyway - right up to the moment they fired.In the meantime, is it not better to focus on making crime illegal…
Please be specific on the kind of effort you mean to pour into mental health.and on pouring much more effort into mental health?
Who are you going to incarcerate? The high school kid who makes disturbing posts on social media? Any due process there? As for incarceration in general, the US already has incarcerated a higher percentage of its population than any nation on earth, and still has one of the highest rate of gun deaths of any developed nation. And you want the incarceration rate to go even higher? It is sometimes said that insanity is continuing to do the same thing and expecting different results.Incarceration is prevention and saves the violent life for a chance at repentance.
That depends on what those resources are and what you intend them to do. Be specific.Mental health resources are simply compassion in action. Who could argue against this?
The proliferation of guns is already oppressing peaceful citizens who have to live in fear. Gun control relieves peaceful citizens of that oppression.All of this may be done without oppressing peaceful citizens…
Updating a document that was designed to be updated is not shredding that document. It is honoring it.and without shredding one of the finest documents ever written pertaining to human liberty.
You mean like the motive to sell more guns and empower the already powerful? Yeah, I could believe that is the ulterior motive of the gun lobby.Unless there is an ulterior motive.
Oh, wow! Just what I always wanted! To live in a country more like Nigeria!Nigeria has been facing the threat for some time. Their solution to violent crime is to enable the innocent to defend themselves and their communities.
Our bishops are addressing both the spiritual aspects and the legal aspects of gun violence.OK. So? Is not the USCCB far better off addressing the spiritual aspects of violence?
Nevertheless, we are charged with opposing evil as best we can.Trying to legislate the devil out of existence has failed…
There is no law that forces those age limits to be the same.If the age of firearms ownership is raised, so then must the age to vote or serve in the military be raised.
By making it harder to get the weapons that they use.The problem is cultural loss of hope which leads to suicidal ideation and as we know: suicidal = homicidal. Mass murder is mass suicide done by one perpetrator. So, how do we step up and stop these train wrecks before they act?
I have lots of ideas, but they are all liberal ideas, so you probably don’t want to hear them.How do we get the hopeless and suicidal the help they need?
The kind of limits that I have in mind would not be a “massive” restriction on the law-abiding. Remember, most mass murders were law-abiding, right up to the moment they pulled the trigger. So yes, we need to limit the law-abiding.Is the only solution to massively increase governmental power and blanket restrictions on the law abiding?
Gun laws do not cause crime. Means, motive, and opportunity do. Gun laws reduces the means. Social programs reduce the motive.The left will get their gun laws. And crime will once again increase.
You mean like the fact that the US has more guns per capita than any developed nation on earth, and has a higher rate of gun deaths than any developed nation on earth except for Brazil? Certainly don’t let those facts get in the way of defending gun rights.Facts are facts, but we never let facts get in the way of social crusading.
You are failing to recognise this as the war mongers tenet. The thinking of someone who sees peace as hopelessness. The arms industry sells that very well for the sake of their massive profits.America is on the verge of collapse and government cannot help us; it will not help us. Great time to disarm the peaceful and enable the violent. It will be a bloodbath - it already is.