What's the deal with pre-marital sex?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonikiro
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s hypocritical to say you won’t marry someone because they didn’t have sex before marriage also, . It goes both ways. And by the way, it’s rude and uncalled for to call someone who had sex before marriage a bum. You are basically calling most people in America a bum including the original poster. Isn’t it hypocritical of you to say such a statement when god says to treat others the way you want to be treated…

By the way, I was a virgin when I got married.
  1. It’s only hypocritical if a non-virgin insists on his/her spouse being a virgin. But the point I was making was the “it pays more to not obey the rules” signal that the virgin receives when he/she is rejected in favor of a non-virgin, and I was not directing it at the original poster.
  2. I guess it was rude and uncalled for when St. Paul, inspired by God, called Cretans “liars, beasts, and lazy gluttons” in Titus 1:12…
 
  1. It’s only hypocritical if a non-virgin insists on his/her spouse being a virgin.
Did you even read what the other poster said? She said it was a preference not a requirement so your statement was totally uncalled for. I am not talking about the original poster here, I am talking about the other person you quoted.
But the point I was making was the “it pays more to not obey the rules” signal that the virgin receives when he/she is rejected in favor of a non-virgin, and I was not directing it at the original poster.
Interesting when I saw no one on this thread saying they would reject a virgin.
  1. I guess it was rude and uncalled for when St. Paul, inspired by God, called Cretans “liars, beasts, and lazy gluttons” in Titus 1:12…
By the way I noticed you didn’t quote "“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” — Jesus (ca. 5 BCE—33 CE) in the Gospels, Luke 6:31; Luke 10:27 (affirming of Moses)— Matthew 7:12 "

For a religious person calling someone a bum, take a look in the mirror and point out the perfection you are. I doubt you will be able to do it. I don’t see anyone on this thread insisting that their spouse not be a virgin. Basically what I am saying is, those in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
 
Did you even read what the other poster said? She said it was a preference not a requirement so your statement was totally uncalled for. I am not talking about the original poster here, I am talking about the other person you quoted.

Interesting when I saw no one on this thread saying they would reject a virgin.
That’s all irrelevant. Even the mere preference sends out a signal “it doesn’t pay to obey the rules”.
By the way I noticed you didn’t quote "“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” — Jesus (ca. 5 BCE—33 CE) in the Gospels, Luke 6:31; Luke 10:27 (affirming of Moses)— Matthew 7:12 "
Because that was not the point of your post, you were objecting to my strong choice of words, and I simply showed examples of strong words in scripture that could also be condsidered “rude” to some. But, to indulge you, if I were ever to find myself in the situation where I would not be offering someone the 100% that they were offering me, I would would be obligated to defer to someone else who could offer her 100%
For a religious person calling someone a bum, take a look in the mirror and point out the perfection you are. I doubt you will be able to do it. I don’t see anyone on this thread insisting that their spouse not be a virgin. Basically what I am saying is, those in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
I find it very insulting that on a board where we are trying to get people to avoid pre-marital sex those who do avoid it are are mocked like this. Is this how we motivate people to obey the rules, by mocking those who do?

And you still haven’t addressed the fact that St.Paul called people liars and gluttons.

Please do an analysis on the scriptures I provided like I did for the ones that you posted and address what is posted like I did for what you posted.
 
That’s all irrelevant. Even the mere preference sends out a signal “it doesn’t pay to obey the rules”…
It’s not irrelevant because you made it seem like she was saying one thing when it she clearly wasn’t. It wasn’t fair for her to be accused of something she wasn’t saying you know what I mean?
Because that was not the point of your post, you were objecting to my strong choice of words, and I simply showed examples of strong words in scripture that could also be condsidered “rude” to some. But, to indulge you, if I were ever to find myself in the situation where I would not be offering someone the 100% that they were offering me, I would would be obligated to defer to someone else who could offer her 100%
I am not objecting to your statements, I just find it rude calling people names and accusing the other poster of saying something she clearly didn’t.
I find it very insulting that on a board where we are trying to get people to avoid pre-marital sex those who do avoid it are are mocked like this. Is this how we motivate people to obey the rules, by mocking those who do?
This is exactly what I am saying you are doing. I find it insulting that you clearly mocked the other poster for stating her personal preference when she clearly did not say she would reject anyone. What is the saying, do as I say, not as I do?
And you still haven’t addressed the fact that St.Paul called people liars and gluttons. .
I have actually. I quoted a statement by Jesus. Your quote doesn’t give the ticket to say it’s okay to call people names. I thought being catholic was all about kindness and forgiving. Not making fun of people or putting people down. Calling people names doesn’t show you to be the better person. What about when the pope forgave criminals. I can’t imagine him calling them insulting names.

Look, I have two nephews and I just found out I am pregnant. Both children go to catholic school like my sister and I did. Both were brought up to not call people names or to pick out faults . Both are polite and non-judgemental. Even the school teached my children this. This is what I want to live by. Don’t judge people, don’t make fun of people. Do unto others. This is basically what I am saying. Yes, I want them both to wait for sex in marriage by the way and that’s how they are being brought up.
 
By the way I noticed you didn’t quote "“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” — Jesus (ca. 5 BCE—33 CE) in the Gospels, Luke 6:31; Luke 10:27 (affirming of Moses)— Matthew 7:12 "

For a religious person calling someone a bum, take a look in the mirror and point out the perfection you are. I doubt you will be able to do it. I don’t see anyone on this thread insisting that their spouse not be a virgin. Basically what I am saying is, those in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
Let’s just cut to the chase, Norseman you seem to like to call a spade a spade. Where you are in the wrong, would you mind yourself being called out on it? I suppose Norseman might actually have a preference to be blunt, and would prefer that method for someone correcting him, speaking as a guy, but especially as myself I can appreciate that and see it as an act of charity.

So I’ll say so much as, Norseman watch how you phrase things to some people. You need to understand people resond what gets the point across for one person, might have the complete opposite effect on another.
 
Well, after reading all your responses, I suppose I can give a few more details. (this is gonna be long, so bear with me)

My girlfriend and I met on a religious retreat. We’re both heavily involved in the church, both in servicing the masses and helping out in any religious education and etc. (and yeah, we both go to the same church :p). In 2 months will be our 1 year anniversary.

We had sex at the 6 month point. We had sex because we believed we couldn’t hold back any longer. The oral and other such stuff was becoming too hot, and thus we decided to take the safe(er) way and use condoms. It was the first time for both of us.

Unfortunately, about a week later, we decided to see what unprotected sex felt like. Of course, I pulled out, but it resulted in a pregnancy scare at the end of the month. A week before her period was scheduled to start, we got together and planned out everything we would have to do. For us, abortion/adoption were never options. Neither were contraceptives other than condoms (she’s not a fan of hormones)

After she missed her period, we all got ready to tell everyone. The last test for us was a home pregnancy test. After we used it, we learned…

She wasn’t pregnant.

The whole experience left us shaken, but glad. We vowed never to have sex again, and went to church to ask for forgiveness.

About 2 weeks later, we were having sex again. On the night it happened, she said she had brought an extra condom down because she knew it would happen. I felt guilty, to say the least.

So now, a few days later, I come to you looking for some common sense answers to this question. Some way I can make her understand why sex isn’t an option anymore. She seems to want it more than I do (which is understandable, since I’m the one wearing the condom = not too much feeling).

Though this may not mean much, I do plan to marry this woman. She plans to marry me as well. What we plan and what actually happens are two different things, yes, but the will is there. As I understand, oral sex and other forms of masturbation are against the church’s teachings as well.

I wasn’t willing to stop those forms of sex, and that’s what lead us to having sex again. How do you lead a pre-marital life void of sexual pleasures? It seems so difficult!
Are you receiving the Blessed Sacrament in grave sin? Do you go to confession each time prior to receiving the Blessed Sacrament? What are you teaching in religious education? Have you read the CCC? It sounds to me, and I must be honest, that you need a break from her and her from you. Your soul is at risk if you continue your relationship. How do you lead a pre-marital life void of sexual pleasure; prayer, trust in God and Church teachings. Also study Church teaching concerning birth control or continue to practice in pre abortion practices; another grave sin. Sorry to be so blunt or honest in my rsponse.
 
lisa and norseman, quit the flame war, the problem’s solved in this thread. Make a new one if you must fight it out.
 
Let’s just cut to the chase, Norseman you seem to like to call a spade a spade. Where you are in the wrong, would you mind yourself being called out on it? I suppose Norseman might actually have a preference to be blunt, and would prefer that method for someone correcting him, speaking as a guy, but especially as myself I can appreciate that and see it as an act of charity.

So I’ll say so much as, Norseman watch how you phrase things to some people. You need to understand people resond what gets the point across for one person, might have the complete opposite effect on another.
I normally just read and not post but I had to say that I totally agree with this.
 
You will readily note that this thread has lost several posts and been closed.

Those of you responsible know who you are and why.
MF
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top