What's the point in dating in today's society

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdavani
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t care about sexual history because I’m wasn’t always catholic and so I dabbled like most people dabbled. I’m not a TLM only guy but I want a woman who takes sundays and holy days of obligation seriously. Just so long as she doesn’t have any heretical beliefs I’m good.

Maybe because I’m relearning how to talk to women since I wasn’t always this devout dating has been pretty nonexistent. I don’t feel like women like me in that way. Or if I’m at church I’ll meet some women my age but they’re not really interested. Or they already are married. Or theyre not really catholic. Like they wanna sleep together before marriage or they support planned parenthood. I don’t know why it’s hard for me and not for others.
 
Where did you get this idea that I’m advocating arranged Unification Church type of marriages from my post? I’m simply saying that as Catholics we need to adopt a mindset of supporting our fellow Catholics, including in dating/marriage, from the preaching in the pulpit to the advice we give people and, sad to say, who and what we choose to “shame” (and yes, I’ve seen “shaming” done here on CAF, whether it be criticism of people who simply are frustrated in their quest for marriage or the derisive use of the term “virgin-hunter” when in fact a person may simply be seeking a spouse with a similar sexual past).
–Well, people often want a degree of help that if they got it, they probably wouldn’t like. People do, to this day, complain about friends and family trying to set them with people who aren’t their cup of tea.
–What kind of preaching do you want that you don’t get?
–CAF has a lot of long-married people. They/we might just know a thing or two.
–There are a lot of marital trainwrecks out there, and yes, people who have seen some of them tend to jump up and down waving their arms and trying to prevent another one.
–I have used the term virgin-hunter (which I got from Dorothy Cummings McLean), and I think it’s very fair to use when talking about men who have shady pasts (and sometimes even shady presents) but feel entitled to a virgin bride.
–Sometimes people’s expectations just aren’t reasonable or are way too detailed. (You may remember a certain loooooong wish list from a female poster.)
–Sometimes expectations are reasonable, but I still have to ask, “Is this requirement worth dying alone over?”
 
Last edited:
Funny! Yes, CAF seems to have a limited gene pool sometimes!
The one that always gets me is when we have parallel threads going along these lines.

Her: I am a devout single Catholic woman looking for a devout single man, and I can’t find anybody!

Him: I am a devout single Catholic man looking for a devout single woman, and I can’t find anybody!

Sometimes the threads cross, but a lot of times, neither notices the other.
 
My husband was 4000 miles form me when we were talking for 2 years. He wanted to marry me, so he jumped across the pond. It happens.
 
In my experience about over half of the relationships I know have involved relocation for at least one person, that said a potential relocation of thousands of miles would be pretty daunting and the OP has stated a definite reluctance to move.
 
I have used the term virgin-hunter (which I got from Dorothy Cummings McLean), and I think it’s very fair to use when talking about men who have shady pasts (and sometimes even shady presents) but feel entitled to a virgin bride.
The problem is that the term also unfairly catches men without shady pasts in the crosshairs, so it would be best to be clearer and specify that one is referring to hypocrites.
What kind of preaching do you want that you don’t get?
Well, one example would be that when the reading is from Genesis in which God says “it is not good for the man to be alone” the homilist can use that to debunk the modern notion that one must be content with being alone before being ready for marriage and include CCC 1603 as an added example to back it up. Another example would be when the Gospel reading includes the “eunichs for the kingdom” speech by Jesus, include a commentary regarding what Jesus said regarding how not everyone can accept that teaching, only those to whom it was given and expand on how not everyone can handle lifelong celibacy and how it is a supernatural vocation that requires extraordinary graces. I’m sure there are more, but these two can be a good start to combat the anti-marriage mindset that some people (even here on CAF) have been infected with.
There are a lot of marital trainwrecks out there, and yes, people who have seen some of them tend to jump up and down waving their arms and trying to prevent another one.
Considering that some simple jump on people just for seeking marriage, I would question whether they are really trying to say “don’t repeat a mistake that I or someone else made”, or instead reacting hysterically in an attempt to “rain on another’s parade” because they couldn’t keep their own marriage from falling apart. It’s similar to a person who knew someone who died in a motorcycle wreck (due to careless riding) yelling and screaming hysterically at anyone who even looked at a motorcycle.
 
The problem is that the term also unfairly catches men without shady pasts in the crosshairs, so it would be best to be clearer and specify that one is referring to hypocrites.
I’m also not crazy about guys who are so into virginity that that’s the primary thing that they are interested in.


It often shows a certain lack of interest in the woman as an individual (as in DCM’s story of her first husband).

(I recently learned that one branch of my extended family has a multi-generational incest problem. You can imagine how that makes me feel about CAF guys who treat non-virgin women like last week’s garbage.)
I’m sure there are more, but these two can be a good start to combat the anti-marriage mindset that some people (even here on CAF) have been infected with.
A lot of the people that you think of as having an “anti-marriage mindset” are likely people who have been happily married for a long time–it’s just they’ve seen a thing or two.
Considering that some simple jump on people just for seeking marriage, I would question whether they are really trying to say “don’t repeat a mistake that I or someone else made”, or instead reacting hysterically in an attempt to “rain on another’s parade” because they couldn’t keep their own marriage from falling apart.
I personally am concerned by people who believe that just getting married will fix everything in their lives.

And I’m especially concerned by people who have no real life friends, and expect a spouse and children to fulfill all their social needs.
 
Not going to address your objections one by one. But it’s clear that you are so negative about what’s over there that you are almost totally incapable of finding anything good in there. Heck, the one positive thing you did cite, you couldn’t help but add a snarky tone to it. Gives meaning to your outlook.

As I said earlier in this thread, the best advice I got was to find what works and is compatible with being Catholic and toss the rest. To begin with, before I found the manosphere, no one ever had a coherent explanation why nice guys can’t get any respect, the best advice I got in those days was “just be yourself”. Well when one finds himself well down in the lower 50% of men and wants to do better, that advice is way worse than useless and I have contempt for anyone who says that now. Like that definition of insanity: expecting me to do the same thing over, but somehow thinking I’ll magically get different results.

Along those lines, no explanation for the friendzone and why I got put there, no explanation why some women including some of the ones I liked tended to go for bad guys who didn’t treat them well, no explanation why my father the naturally gregarious extrovert could not explain to his introverted son how he did it. Nor could my mother tell me anything more than to be nice, if only because she wanted me to stop clashing with her all the time. I love my parents, but I’m not like either of them in looks or personality.

Nobody told me why respect from wives to husbands is so important and how its loss always jeopardizes a marriage. I learned how the man acts to make it easy for her to respect him is important and I learned that her obligation to give him that respect is also important. As Guttmann writes, when a wife has contempt for her husband, that’s the surest indicator of all that a divorce is coming. Nice guys get divorced. Good guys who aren’t nice guys stand a better chance.

Before the manosphere, the only useful advice I got was, hey Z, you could learn public speaking, you could stand to lose some weight … and that was it.

Since then, I’ve done far better. I even had a long term relationship in which we contemplated marriage before we ultimately decided to break it off. Before the manosphere, that girl would have chewed up the old nice guy me and spit me into the friendzone before the 1st date was half over. But instead we had great times together and I have no regrets. I now understand what makes my parents’ marriage still a go after all these years. That makes me smile and gives me hope. There is a lot more to my transformation, but not enough space here so I’ll stop here.

I’m not that good looking and I’m well below 6’ tall, let’s be frank I still look like a dork though I’ve lost the weight. So online never worked for me. Not much in Catholic activities around here so secular, here I come. Back on topic, what’s the point of dating: for me, as serious an introvert as I have always been, just getting out of the house is the most important thing and dates are just a bonus.
 
I’ve encountered women like this. 18, 19 early 20s, want to keep the good Catholic boy in their back pocket while she sleeps around until she hits 30 and loses all of her good looks and maybe a kid or two along the way with a deadbeat dad. THEN it’s time for the decent guy to come in and save the day.

Or not.
Getting a virgin is not the important thing. On the other hand, I am definitely not the good Catholic boy in that girl’s back pocket and she shouldn’t look to me to rescue her from the consequences of her choices. That outlook does limit my pool a bit, but I’m good with that.
 
Well, it’s not even about virginity at that point. That’s a much higher bar that what I described. I’m with you if you don’t want to rescue someone from her choices. Some women don’t want a decent guy, don’t want to be rescued and don’t want their virgin purity safeguarded.
 
Every woman wants a decent man but if they choose a man who isn’t decent it’s because they don’t know what a decent man is.
 
To begin with, before I found the manosphere, no one ever had a coherent explanation why nice guys can’t get any respect, the best advice I got in those days was “just be yourself”.
That’s intellectually lazy advice you got from people. I had to do a complete 180 with what I thought about women before I had a successful dating life.
Nice guys get divorced. Good guys who aren’t nice guys stand a better chance.
Nice guys often don’t even get that far. Have to be married to be divorced. Women don’t want a nice guy, and I don’t care how much they or society pretend they do. They want a man who can provide/entertain her and who wants protection and romantic communication.
 
I really love your username, @stupidisastupiddoes. 🙂

I have to admit, your post put a smile on my face!

It got me to thinking, that sometimes we can meet someone through others, though.

That’s how I met my husband–through our friends.

We had mutual friends that were going out with each other, and they thought that we should meet, so they set us up.
 
Nice guys aren’t always nice, a lot of them can come across as quite passive aggressive and whiny. Not trying to suggest anyone on here is like that as obviously I don’t know.

I have some sympathy for men these days, the education system does seem more geared up for girls and many women are reluctant to date less educated men. Also the economy makes things harder for lower income men, my late grandfather lived in London and worked in a factory and was able to feed and house a family with his wages. A modern man on minimum wage would need to go cap in hand to the benefit office just to pay the rent on some insecure slum housing so obviously won’t be much of a dating prospect.
 
I don’t know what’s going to happen after another decade of women outnumbering men by close to a 3-2 margin at the college level. I do know from experience that women tend not to want to marry down, today they mostly aren’t, but what happens in 10 years?

Both spouses being college graduates who are also UMC or better have clear advantages over everyone else in making marriages last. I am not UMC so I have to vet harder than they do. So I guess if one is UMC or better, there is definitely a point to dating with an eye toward marriage. The rest of us can do that, but the bar is considerably higher.
 
You need to fix your game with women. Here is the link to the most useful youtube channel for dating that should whip you into shape. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1PkRYud11ogYDqgdqd23Zw/videos

If you have questions I wouldn’t mind being your dating coach.
And I’m ok. But I don’t have game. Don’t know how to up it. Don’t even care to anymore. I don’t see the point.
You have game, you just need to refine it my friend. One of the traits women love is nice mild confidence (not cocky prideful confidence). Don’t beat yourself up over this stuff. You should get a tinder or something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top