What's with all the anti women threads recently??

  • Thread starter Thread starter BingoBoy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
On the contrary, I have availed myself many times of the solutions that feminists brought to our society. I vote in every election, I speak to men without waiting to be spoken to, I own property, I walk alongside men (rather than 10 feet behind them), I work to support my family, and I obtained a no-fault divorce to secure the safety of myself and my children. And not only that, because I was secure in taking care of myself and my children, I was able to be open to love and marry a wonderful man.

How can you possibly say that feminism has brought no solutions when the contrary evidence is standing right in front of your face? (err, typing words that appear on the computer in front of your face, rather)
I went to college, joined the workforce in a male dominated industry, and when I go to the doctor he tells me what’s wrong with me. He doesn’t leave the room to explain it to my father or husband.
 
Also, radical feminism tells guys to be guilty of being masculine.
Here’s how I respond to that garbage: Why should I be guilty of being masculine? Is masculinity a crime?
You cannot make all these wild claims that you’ve been making for 20 pages and expect to be taken seriously without specific examples.
 
**AngryAtheist8 wrote in Post #241 **

“… know a lot of Feminists who hate (or at least are dismissive towards) Scripture because they take its apparently misogynistic passages at face value.”

Well… at least it is *honest *of you to admit Feminists hate Scripture. I will give you cred for that.

I note that you assert that Feminists ‘apparently’ view passages as mysoginistic as well. At least in terms of their ‘Face Value.’ This may indeed be accurate as well as I do not really have any high hopes for Feminists to actually examine closely any serious exegesis of Scriptures.

I am curious however… Could you please explain to me, I mean I reallllllllllyy want to know… why… a Catholic should become a Feminist in view of the attested to **hatred **of the beloved Scriptures by Feminists (Note: not Radical Feminists) :confused:

Ahmmmm?
 
I brought up an anti-male thread a couple months ago. Some posters there denied the anti-male-ness of the comments quoted in the OP. So what does all this prove? 🤷
 
On the contrary, I have availed myself many times of the solutions that feminists brought to our society. I vote in every election, I speak to men without waiting to be spoken to, I own property, I walk alongside men (rather than 10 feet behind them), I work to support my family, and I obtained a no-fault divorce to secure the safety of myself and my children. And not only that, because I was secure in taking care of myself and my children, I was able to be open to love and marry a wonderful man.

How can you possibly say that feminism has brought no solutions when the contrary evidence is standing right in front of your face? (err, typing words that appear on the computer in front of your face, rather)
I said radical feminism, not feminism in general. Feminism has done a lot of of good in the world and I agree with you. But, radical feminism had taken over now. It had turned mainstream feminism into another party in the mess that is identity politics. Hence, what I said about radical feminism not solving anything but whining and complaining.
 
Also, radical feminism tells guys to be guilty of being masculine.
Here’s how I respond to that garbage: Why should I be guilty of being masculine? Is masculinity a crime?
Well there are no radical feminists here who feel that way. 🤷
 
The problem with Edwest’s outlook is that he frequently confuses the idea of a woman wanting control over herself and her own life with wanting control over men. He’s said time and time again that a woman’s family should play a strong role in choosing her husband, and in the thread I mentioned earlier he was upset about a woman rejecting her family’s tradition by refusing an arraigned marriage. These women do not seek to control men, only to control themselves.
It must be because control over women is the birthright of men; so by women wanting to act as responsible moral agents, they are depriving men of their birthright, and thus are controlling men.

Purely speculation, but so far it’s the only thing I can think of that explains the irrational reactions to the fiminists on here.
Just skimmed through it. Luckily, the people who were actually condemning the movie seemed to be in the vast minority.

Can’t wait to see it myself though, I love pixar! 🙂
Me too - my girls are excited! Plus, my little redhead is excited to see another redheaded princess!
 
Well there are no radical feminists here who feel that way. 🤷
I’ve seen how it demonizes masculinity through the media portrayal of men especially fathers. Back then, there’s “Father knows best”. Now, we have the likes of Homer Simpson and Peter Griffin.
 
No kidding! Just look at your average TV commercial how men are portrayed!
 
I went to college, joined the workforce in a male dominated industry, and when I go to the doctor he tells me what’s wrong with me. He doesn’t leave the room to explain it to my father or husband.
👍
I said radical feminism, not feminism in general. Feminism has done a lot of of good in the world and I agree with you. But, radical feminism had taken over now. It had turned mainstream feminism into another party in the mess that is identity politics. Hence, what I said about radical feminism not solving anything but whining and complaining.
ALL feminism was “radical feminism” in the era of its initiation. Suffrage? Radical. Working? Radical. I could go on.
 
I’ve seen how it demonizes masculinity through the media portrayal of men especially fathers. Back then, there’s “Father knows best”. Now, we have the likes of Homer Simpson and Peter Griffin.
Just two quick points:
  1. Both of those shows were created by men.
  2. Both of the moms in the show are stay at home moms!
And those shows aren’t anti masculinity. They are anti decency. Really, do not try to use them to figure out your role in society.
 
I’ve seen how it demonizes masculinity through the media portrayal of men especially fathers. Back then, there’s “Father knows best”. Now, we have the likes of Homer Simpson and Peter Griffin.
Well, obviously that’s not where you go for male role models on TV. There are far too many movies to name with strong, admirable male characters, but if you want to restrict yourself to TV, litearally any of the reality shows (along the lines of Pawn Stars, anything on Food Network, Billy the Exterminator, Dog the Bounty Hunter), all have great male characters.
 
**AngryAtheist8 wrote in Post #241 **

“… know a lot of Feminists who hate (or at least are dismissive towards) Scripture because they take its apparently misogynistic passages at face value.”

Well… at least it is *honest *of you to admit Feminists hate Scripture. I will give you cred for that.
Note: he says “I know a lot of…”

This does not mean “feminists” in general hate scripture. Of course, we all know this is impossible considering all the perfectly good Christian people here who are feminists.

That would be the same as me saying “I know a lot of Catholics who support Obama…”

And someone else responding with “Well, at least it is honest of you to admit Catholics like Obama.”

It’s completely wrong.

But you know that.
 
I’ve seen how it demonizes masculinity through the media portrayal of men especially fathers. Back then, there’s “Father knows best”. Now, we have the likes of Homer Simpson and Peter Griffin.
It’s still a repercussion from sitcoms of the 80s like Full House, where the mothers were absent. Still lame shows like Family Guy are a disrespect to all people, not just men.
 
I read somewhere that women are the spawn of satan and only good for ****ing… sorry but for the life of me i cant find a source… 😦
 
Well, obviously that’s not where you go for male role models on TV. There are far too many movies to name with strong, admirable male characters, but if you want to restrict yourself to TV, litearally any of the reality shows (along the lines of Pawn Stars, anything on Food Network, Billy the Exterminator, Dog the Bounty Hunter), all have great male characters.
Not to mention the old male characters weren’t all great either. Archie Bunker anyone?
 
ALL feminism was “radical feminism” in the era of its initiation. Suffrage? Radical. Working? Radical. I could go on.
I disagree with you. Before radicalism had any plans for takeovers, mainstream feminism was rather sane. Yes, suffrage and radical feminism were revolutionary ideas in the early 20th century, but these were hardly radical. The paradigm shift happened when radical feminism came along and took over the mainstream feminist movement. However, there are rebellions within the mainstream feminist movement now. In mainstream feminism, a feminist with conservative values is treated like an outcast. With the radical takeover of mainstream feminism, it’s all about conformity rather than diversity. A good example of this is Gwen Landolt. She is a feminist, but not a radical one.
 
AthenaC wrote:

“…It must be because control over women is the birthright of men; so by women wanting to act as responsible moral agents, they are depriving men of their birthright, and thus are controlling men.”

Come on. Seriously?:rolleyes: Did you just really write that?

Le Gasp! Those horrible, brutish, insufferable** men** that are all out conspiring to turn women into **Chattel!! **

Please. See somebody.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top