M
MyRdmrLvs
Guest
I would visit also! but then I would visit yours too kempo.wow two protestants in agreement!!! lol![]()
I would visit also! but then I would visit yours too kempo.wow two protestants in agreement!!! lol![]()
If Peter chose his successor why doesnt the pope today choose his? ew 666 posts![SIGN][/SIGN]
Easy in acts 9:4 Saul Saul why are you persecuting me, he said who are you sir the reply came JESUS THE ONE YOU ARE PERSECUTING. The first church was called the Christian Church and the second Pope Ignatius was ordained by Peter, He is the first to call the Christian Church the Catholic Church.![]()
It most certainly is apart of it.I just thought I’d put my two cents in here!
Simply put, unless one disavows, ignores etc. in apostolic succession and the writings of the early Church Fathers, I cannot find a reasonable argument against the current “Catholic Church” being the “historical church founded by Jesus Christ”.
That book contains the words of our LORD, they might not have authority for you but they do for me.you cannot say such a thing. Jesus says that His Church will teach the Truth because He gave the Spirit of Truth. what you said contradict what Jesus says. the reason you have doubts is because you dont know the Truth. you go by what you think and ignoring the historical facts of the Church. Jesus said: He would be wiht His Church until the end. if Jesus spoke the Truth then His Church, based on His promises. cannot teach error. it is difficult for one today to know the Truth due to so many groups preaching in the Name of our Lord. that is one more reason why it is so important that all men seek the Truth where the Truth is and not where i think the Truth is. we Catholics are under an authority Jesus and His Church, protestants claim authority for themselves as the Bible. but the Bible itself says no such thing. without the Church you are left with a historical Book without knowing what to make of it.
That’s about the most ridiculous** thing I’ve ever heard.
Maybe it’s God’s will that a Pope be allowed to live longer** to do God’s will.
Maybe somebody should have told that to Paul when he hid in a basket and was lowered beyond the walls of Damascus to escape.
Your words, "I don’t think" seem very appropriate here . . .
yep and me too!That book contains the words of our LORD, they might not have authority for you but they do for me.
Thats not that hard to believe,I was told one time that I was the devil because I was Cathloic and was going to hell with all the other Cathloic.Oh no. Now Tony is accused of being the devil now. Poor Tony. Who will be next?![]()
I dont know much. Can a person write a check to avoid consequence for sin? would a contribution get my mother out of purgatory?and just what you know about indulgences? when people do great things for the Church of God, they will receive indulgences. prove to me this is contrary to God’s will. can some people abuse? sure they can.
you cannot look at the Church with the eyes of modernists. you will have to go back in history in the same way you cannot read the Bible with the eyes of modernists.
I didnt say failed, those are your words.what Doctrines? who says any Doctrines of the CC is off track? who determines? you? as far as i know Jesus built one Church and that was 2000 yrs ago. all power and authority was given to Jesus and He gave to the Apostles(His Church).
who decides that the CC has failed? you?
notice I said, “I wonder if its possible…” Knowing the nature of man, I would expect only quotes that support church doctrine to be preserved and propagated. I have seen quotes from the founding fathers of America used to support the notion that they were deists who believed in the separation of church and state, and others to prove that most were Christians who believed America is and must be a Christian nation. I have seen quotes from hitler that show he was a Christian and others that prove he was not. So rather that play the quote game I prefer to look at the record of there actions.Now, who were the Church Fathers that dissagree with the CC? please tell us. we want to know.
you have to remember that the Church is not one man Church like protestants congregations. the Apostles appointed Bishops and many others in teh Church. as the Church went out into the world and grew these positions had to increase in numbers.
as in Acts, some teachings were popping up in some places. the Apostles got together and decided what the True teach should be. so it has been throughout the years of the Church. this has not changed. the Church protects the Truth of our Lord.
does your congregation exist for 2000 yrs and fought hereticals teachings? which doctrine has your congregation come up with? tell me.
You do not have a grasp on what infallibility is. It would not cover such things as history. That is what you are discussing here the history of the Church’s name. We would want you to understand WHAT infallible means and correctly represent it. Rather than spread untruths about our beliefs.I got this from here in the Catholic Answeres Forums from a Roman Catholic named rinnie from post 245.
How can one Catholic say one thing and another say something different. And you want us to believe that the doctrine is infallible when you can’t even agree about the first name of the church.
Originally Posted by tweetymom View Post
Cool, because Jesus did find me and I do read the Bible.
Saying: "…in the beginning was the word and the word was with God, does not address the question. I know you read your bible, but that’s not what I was asking you. I am not the type of person that thinks that you must belong to the CC, or believe what the CC believes: quite the contrary. If you are happy where you are, then that is all that should matter - right? BTW, I do not believe that the CC interprets EVERYTHING infallibly. With that said, I ask with the utmost love, charity and respect for your beliefs as a sister in Christ, the following:Because in the beginning was the word and the word was with God. Why do you believe the CC interperted everything infallible?
I have the utmost respect for today’s Catholic Church and also for Pope Benedict. However, there is absolutely no possibility of your statement above being true. Besides many other reasons why, I will give you two. 1) Constantine took what was then the Christian church and turned it into something else. When this happened, the old church vanished. 2.) There have been more than one occasion of two Popes in history and the “conquering” Pope was not in the so called succession of Peter; thus breaking the chain. There is no doubt that the CC is the oldest church that we know of, She was bigger and badder than the rest when churches were “battling it out” so to speak.I know I’m repeating myself, but…
It seems to me, unless one disavows/ignores/denies etc. apostolic succession and the writings of the early church fathers, the church known today as “The Catholic Church” is “the historical church founded by Jesus Christ”.
You are trying to label just one visible church denomination when in fact Jesus’ church includes people from every denomination.Still hoping someone will attempt to identify the historical church of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd century (long before Constantine) - founded by Jesus Christ on Pentecost, in Jerusalem, circa AD 33?
Thanks…![]()
Thank You.I have the utmost respect for today’s Catholic Church and also for Pope Benedict. However, there is absolutely no possibility of your statement above being true. Besides many other reasons why, I will give you two. 1) Constantine took what was then the Christian church and turned it into something else. When this happened, the old church vanished. (Doki: or became invisible.) 2.) There have been more than one occasion of two Popes in history and the “conquering” Pope was not in the so called succession of Peter; thus breaking the chain. There is no doubt that the CC is the oldest church that we know of, She was bigger and badder than the rest when churches were “battling it out” so to speak.
With that being said, I do believe that the historical church Jesus founded is still alive. (Doki: me too.) It just has no “Corporate” name like Catholic or Protestant or Orthodox or whatever (Doki: agreed.). It is alive in the hearts of men (Doki: and women) all over the world and its head is still Christ (Doki: Amen). Jesus, in our sacred scriptures, never uttered the words Catholic or Protestant or Christian (Doki: I have no problem with the label ‘Christian’ because the term describes a follower of Christ Jesus the Lord) for that matter. All who follow Jesus are brothers IN him. THIS is the historical church (Doki: Agreed).
I don’t think, however, this in any way puts down the Catholics or anyone else! (Doki: Agreed; however, some have ‘thin skin’) Many Catholics and also Protestants belong to the historical church (Doki: Agreed), despite belonging to their earthly church organizations; (Just as Nicodemus belonged to the Pharisees but still surrendered his heart to Jesus (Doki: very good point)). So - let’s all be friends and glory in the splendor of him who made the way for us ALL to be saved; from OURSELVES! (Doki: Amen)
One other note on the early church Fathers. I also have respect for them (Doki: Good point). However, most of them have been excommunicated from the church or at least criticized greatly by other church Fathers after him. The church Fathers are only called “Church Fathers” because of the time period within which they lived. There have been many men after them just as faithful, just as intelligent, and just as martyred all down through time who have not been called church Fathers. And we read their writings as well.
ok. so this is your conclusion. do you have Scriptures to back up your conclusions?I have the utmost respect for today’s Catholic Church and also for Pope Benedict. However, there is absolutely no possibility of your statement above being true. Besides many other reasons why, I will give you two. 1) Constantine took what was then the Christian church and turned it into something else. When this happened, the old church vanished. 2.) There have been more than one occasion of two Popes in history and the “conquering” Pope was not in the so called succession of Peter; thus breaking the chain. There is no doubt that the CC is the oldest church that we know of, She was bigger and badder than the rest when churches were “battling it out” so to speak.
With that being said, I do believe that the historical church Jesus founded is still alive. It just has no “Corporate” name like Catholic or Protestant or Orthodox or whatever. It is alive in the hearts of men all over the world and its head is still Christ. Jesus, in our sacred scriptures, never uttered the words Catholic or Protestant or Christian for that matter. All who follow Jesus are brothers IN him. THIS is the historical church.
I don’t think, however, this in any way puts down the Catholics or anyone else! Many Catholics and also Protestants belong to the historical church, despite belonging to their earthly church organizations; (Just as Nicodemus belonged to the Pharisees but still surrendered his heart to Jesus). So - let’s all be friends and glory in the splendor of him who made the way for us ALL to be saved; from OURSELVES!
One other note on the early church Fathers. I also have respect for them. However, most of them have been excommunicated from the church or at least criticized greatly by other church Fathers after him. The church Fathers are only called “Church Fathers” because of the time period within which they lived. There have been many men after them just as faithful, just as intelligent, and just as martyred all down through time who have not been called church Fathers. And we read their writings as well.
i am waiting for the answers to my questions.You are trying to label just one visible church denomination when in fact Jesus’ church includes people from every denomination.