where is the historical church founded by Jesus Christ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joe370
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that every Catholic that does not understand or practice the faith makes the Catholic Church look bad.
Obviously you do. But why are you making this in a sweeping absolute condemnation: “does not understand” and “does not practice”. The suggestion from this is that you are claiming that anything less than 100% knowledge and 100% orthodoxy makes the CC “look bad.” If this is, indeed, what you mean, then I hope that you are not in charge of any actual parishioners. Absolutists rarely work out well in the long run, either for institutions or for fellow parishioners (in my experience).
 
The marriage hasn’t taken place yet. We’re in the courtship phase. The Bride is not complete yet; especially if some members aren’t even born yet.
Indeed, yet He has already given Himself up for her, and she is betrothed to Him. The point is that she is considered His Bride, sanctified and consecrated unto Him. Your question was, how is it that the Church is both His Spouse, and His own Body. I hope that this question was addressed.

Jesus identifies Himself completely with the Church. That is why, when people attack the Church, they are attacking Christ.
 
This is a good point. We are in the Non-Catholic subforum, which is where we should expect that these non-Catholic ideas be expressed. 👍

I think that every Catholic that does not understand or practice the faith makes the Catholic Church look bad.

What can be said about those that are here on CAF is that they are at least grappling with faith issues. Most Catholics are ignorant (I don’t mean that as insulting, but as a lack of knowledge) and not only don’t know it, but do nothing to correct it.
I’m so glad you said that. I started a post trying to convey that message, but gave up because the words eluded me (a huge problem of mine).

Being a cradle catholic isn’t always a good thing, it sometimes becomes more a matter of “ethnicity” rather than true faith. When I turned 40 I think the Holy Spirit gave me a nudge (one of several) that I finally did not ignore. I felt a need to learn what my faith was really about. I suspect many catholics grapple with some of the teachings, but they don’t have to spread what they struggle with as truth. I decided that what I didn’t understand, I’d learn through forums and other Catholic sites. Please! Some of us are in our infancy in our faith, please don’t cloud the waters with untruths. Those who don’t have the inclination to go online or don’t have the means can’t sift the wheat from the chaff. Thank God forums like this exist where someone who has an “imperfect” understanding of the faith can be corrected by several people who understand properly.
 
**So is Billy Garham actually a Catholic and he doesn’t know it?
**

Perhaps Rinnie could answer. Does he produce good fruit? Now as for me I have someone saying I am not Catholic because I produce bad fruit. :confused: 🤷 Rinnie said in post 1222 if we produce bad fruit it makes us all look bad. Then in post 1230 she says a Catholic obeys everything or else they are protestant. I am actually astonished she would say such a thing. And now I’m also just sitting here wondering if Rinnie means all Catholics, even including some in the hierarchy who have truly produced bad fruit and made us look bad over the centuries, are protestant? I thought they were still Catholic though and I know BG is part of the body of Christ but Rinnie maybe can help us understand. She obviously knows everyone’s fruit and what that makes them. 🤷****
 
Huh? What does Jesus and his Church being one have to do with this scripture? This scripture is speaking of the wise man and the fool. The two of them are distinguised by this parable. The Oil is considered the good deeds? What are you talking about??:confused:
It is about the 5 wise virgins and the 5 unwise virgins; and it’s about the Marriage between Jesus and the Church being a future event.
 
I don’t see why, but, anyway…

Where does the Bible state that Mary was “full of grace”?
Douay Rheim

Luke

26 And in the sixth month, the angel Gabriel was sent from God into a city of Galilee, called Nazareth, 27 To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin’s name was Mary. 28 And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women. 29 Who having heard, was troubled at his saying, and thought with herself what manner of salutation this should be. 30 And the angel said to her: Fear not, Mary, for thou hast found grace with God
 
Originally Posted by MyRdmrLvs
Yes so its not hard to imagine that after 1500 years it might be a good idea to get back the the original documents and see what may have evolved.
All that Jesus taught the apostles could not be written down. By just looking at the written word, you do away with the explanations that Jesus gave to his apostles. Those same understandings of his word that were handed down by his apostles to their successors.
Or you see how He gave us the books of the Bible so we could return to them as the Israelites did. How many times through different kings they let the people drift from the truth and then they were brought back to the scriptures. even at times bing divided do to unfaithfulness. these things happened to them as examples for us.
The Jewish Faith stayed the same, it was the plp that drifted from the faith.
The Isralites didnt change the words of their scripture to change the meanings and leave out entire books to support the theology of a different religion as the protestants have done. The drifting away and coming back will always occur within man.
A 1500 year old banquet might have a few items that need tossing
This sounds egotistical. Who has the authority to toss out scripture, traditions or Doctrines? You, Me, Martin Luther?
Glad you see the pattern in the old testament. Now , How faithful were they to Gods instructions over 1500 years? What did God do about it? Dont think it could happen to Christs church? He threatened to take the spirit away from one of the churches in Revelation. Does God make empty threats?
The pattern of unfaithfullness will always occur. The teachings dont change, the plp do. A Threat is something he will do if you continue on a certain behavior. God also doesnt make empty promises and the gates of hell has not destroyed his Apostolic church to this date.
God used one man in on many occasions to bring His people back to the scriptures. besides Luther, the Bible was beginning to be mass produced at that time and was available to more people.
and all those men were foretold and or were writen about in the bible. Can you show me where Luther was foretold or written about in the bible. Should we add a book called the book of Luther to the bible? With the printing press and the availablility of bible to more plp, man naturally wanted to interpret the words for himself. Luther seized upon this and set himself up as an infallible interpreter of the word. Only the true interpretations that jesus himself gave to his Apostles and their successors should be the interpretation that we should hold fast too. Those interpretations or held intact by the historical Apostolic church of Jesus known as the Catholic Church.
 
Rinnie said:

[SIGN]The Catholic Church IS JESUS CHRIST. So if you can show me where you can gain salvation outside of the CC (Jesus Christ) do so. If you cannot which you cannot do, then you cannot dispute the words of the Pope.

Saul persecuting the CC. Saul Saul why are you persecuting me, WHO are you??? IT is me JESUS. Saul was persecuting the CC!!![/SIGN]

Acts 4:12 “Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”​

Seems according to you that name if the CC? Read carefully what you said and match it with Act 4:12. They don’t match, IMO.
 
She is part of the RCIA program at her parish, and is involved in educating converts who are entering the Roman Catholic Church.
Wow then it seems everyone against her here would say God bless her for her good works and good fruits!
 
The Bible teaches Jesus is God; the Holy Spirit is God and the Father is God. It doesn’t teach Mary was immaculately conceived. To understand IC from the Luke 1:28 is quite a stretch; it’s also not good to make a doctrine around one verse (especially when that one verse doesn’t really say what you’re reading into it.)
**That’s not what I said. I said the word, TRINITY is not explicitly mentioned in the Bible but that it IS implicitly taught. The term, TRINITY was proclaimed by the Catholic Church at the council of Nicaea in 325 A.D.

Ad while we are speaking of taking one verse and building a doctrine around it - isn’t that exactly what Protestantism has done when using 2 Tim. 3:16-17 as a defense for the extremely flawed and false doctrine of menh that is Sola Scriptura? Ummmm . . . that’s EXACTLY what they did.
-We all have grace in the past and on into the present. As you know we aren’t immaculately conceived. It’s what we do with it that matters. I like the definition of grace that says, ‘getting something we don’t deserve at the hand of God’.
Again - this is not what I said.
**I said that the verse translates, “completely, perfectly, enduringly endowed with grace.” You and I were NEVER "completely, perfectly, enduringly endowed with grace - especially not as the word, kecharitomene described Mary, which is the perfect passive participle, indicates a completed action with permanent result. **

****As Thomas Aquinas, a great medieval doctor of the Church, writes, "The Blessed Virgin Mary is full of grace both with respect to operation and to the avoidance of evil. Second, she was full of grace with respect to the overflow of soul to flesh or body. For it is a great thing for the saints to have enough grace to sanctify their soul; but the soul of the Blessed Virgin Mary was so full that from it graces flowed into her body, in order that with it she might conceive the Son of God."
 
But did the historical church really teach the following? I am shocked, horrified and deeply troubled by these statements- I posted them on another thread trying to get answers.
Many of these statements are in response to heresy and rebellion against the historic church.

**I was taught our salvation was through Jesus! ** Any other gospel was false. Were the Popes speaking from “Peter’s Chair” on thesde?

The foundation of all our confidence is found in the Virgin Mary. God has committed to her the treasury of all good things, in order that everyone may know that through her are obtained every hope, every grace, and all salvation. For this is His will: that we obtain everything through Mary. Sweet heart of Mary, be my salvation! Pope Pius IX

The two are not contradictory. Mary brought Jesus into the world, that is why we recognize her special role in salvation history. It is the incarnated and crucified Christ who has purchased our salvation by His death on the cross. He chose to accomplish this by coming into the world through Mary. Since He is the fullnes sof every hope, grace, and all salvation, and He came through her to us, she is considered the Ark of the New Covenant.
For, since it is the will of Divine Providence that we should have the God-Man through Mary, there is no other way for us to receive Christ except from her hands. Pope Pius X
Those hands that held him to her breast, changed his diapers, taught him to walk, and cleaned his skinned knees. What a great privilege for her! Just as the Magi worshipped Him as she held him, so we continue to worship Him in her presence today. It does not make her into divinity, it just means that she is not separated from Him.
He will not taste death forever who, in his dying moments, has recourse to the Blessed Virgin Mary. What will it cost you to save us? Has not Jesus placed in your hands all the treasures of His grace and mercy? You sit crowned as Queen at the right hand of your Son: your dominion reaches as far as the heavens, and to you are subject the earth and all creatures dwelling thereon. Your dominion reaches even down into the abyss of Hell, and you alone O Mary, save us from the hands of Satan. Pope Pius XI
This is a prayer made by a Christian, for Christians. For those who are already in Christ, the powerful intercessory prayer of Mary is completely effectual. She says as much today as she did to the servants at the wedding “Do whatever He tells you”. The servant who follows this instruction is, indeed saved by it.
Nothing comes to us except through the mediation of Mary, for such is the will of God. O Virgin Most Holy, no one abounds in the knowledge of God except through thee; no one O Mother of God, attains salvation except through thee! Every one of the multitudes, therefore, whom the evil of calamitous circumstances has stolen away from Catholic unity, must be born again to Christ by that same Mother whom God has endowed with a never-failing fertility to bring forth a holy people. Pope Leo XIII
Such devotional prayers need to be understood within their historic and cultural context. At the time this was written, a denigration of Mary and her role was taking place.
Mary, not one of thy devout servants has ever perished; may I, too, be saved! Pope Benedict XV
Why do you think Catholics would believe this to be true? Do you realize that no one consecrates themselves to Mary unless they have received her Divine Son, and recognize that, through His Kingship, He has elevated her to the status of a Queen? This is what scripture means when it says He has “raised up the lowly”. The “great things” that Jesus did for His own mother are awesome.
Outside this Church there is no salvation and no remission of sins. Pope Boniface VIII
You will have to explain to me why this would bother you. No one comes to the father but by Christ, and no one is a member of Christ without becoming a member of the Church.
We believe with our hearts and confess with our lips but one Church, not that of heretics, but the Holy Roman, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, outside of which we believe that no one is saved. Pope Innocent III
My only quibble with this statement is that the Catholic Church is not Roman. I think some of the Western Patriarchs suffered from some myopic perspective. I think this was cultural, political, and economic in nature.
He who is separated from the Catholic Church will not have life. He who is separated from the body of the Catholic Church, however praiseworthy his conduct may seem otherwise, will never enjoy eternal life, and the wrath of God remains on him by reason of the crime of which he is guilty in living separated from Christ. All those who are separated from the holy universal Church will not be saved. Pope Gregory XVI
This statement is similar to the one made by Innocent. Do you know what the cultural and religions issues were at the time and place these statements were made?
It must be held as a matter of faith that outside the Apostolic Roman Church no one can be saved, that the Church is the only Ark of Salvation, and that whoever does not enter it will perish in the Flood. It is a sin to believe that there is salvation outside the Catholic Church! You must indeed see to it that the faithful have fixed firmly in their minds the absolute necessity of the Catholic faith for attaining salvation. Protestantism is the Great Revolt against God. Pope Pius IX
This is consistent with the Apostolic Teaching, as well as the present catechism on salvation. Why do you object to this?
So is Billy Garham actually a Catholic and he doesn’t know it?
Those outside the Church do not possess the Holy Ghost. The Catholic Church alone is the Body of Christ… and if separated from the Body of Christ he is not one of His members, nor is he fed by His Spirit. Pope Paul VI
Yes, all who are members of Christ are members of His One Body, the Church. Outside of this One Body, there is no salvation, because no one comes to the father, but by Him. There is no other name under heaven by which we may be saved. I would say that the vast majority of our separated brethren don’t know that we consider them members of the Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation. Obvjously, you are one of them, or you would not be so appalled by these statements.
No one, even if he pours out his blood for the name of Christ, can be saved unless he remains within the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church. Pope Eugene IV
You will find statements from the early fathers that even pre-date the emergence of the Roman (Latin) Rite that say similar things. The Apostles taught that there is only one Church, that it is Catholic, and that outside of it, there is no salvation. There is no other name under heaven by which we may be saved.
We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of **every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff. **Pope Boniface VIII
I think I may have commented on this. Jesus gave the duty to Peter (along with what are called the Petrine gifts) to feed and care for His sheep. He passed this responsbility/office/gift to his successor. The successor of Peter is responsible even for the souls of those who are in rebellion against him.
Into this fold of Jesus Christ no man may enter unless he be led by the Sovereign Pontiff, and only if they be united to him can men be saved. Pope John XXIII
Baptism unites us to Christ, the Head, and through Him, to each other. All who rebel against this place their salvation in danger.
Those who are obstinate toward the authority of the Church and the Roman Pontiff… cannot obtain eternal salvation. Pope Pius IX
Fortunately, the vast majority of our separated brethren accept the majority of the Apostolic doctrine committed to the Church. Most also do not even realize that they under the authority of the successor of Peter, so they are not obstinate. A majority of very good hearted and fervent Christians have never even thought about their relationship to the successor of Peter. If they did, they would not assume they had one.

If and when they become conscious that the successor of Peter has been appointed to feed and care for them and they continue in obstinant defiance, one would have to be concerned about the state of their soul.
 
Transubstantiation, take the big challenge, we know the miracles you believe in, praise God, go into the desert these last weeks of Lent before Christ’s sacrifice for us on the cross, his death and resurrection, and ask Him to show you if his Church is wrong about him being really and truly present Body, Blood Soul and Divinity in the Blessed Sacrament. Ask , open the door to the Truth of His real presence and you will receive now in our time.God bless you more and more, and now with all, abundantly.:)Carlan
And if I come back and said God told me the CC is wrong, will you tell me it was the devil speaking to me?
 
His question was, Are they “still a part” of the body. There is not implication of “full” in the word “part.” Your answer, and I have read them both, is actually a “yes” with the caveat “but not completely a part.”
**Like I said - they are related to the Body in that they have divorced themselves from the Body (the Church). **
They are not, however, abandoned by the Body, which is why we refer to them as "Separated brethren."
 
Read John 6; 25 and following, the Didcourse on the Bread of Life, Pray it until you get it.👍:)God be with you. Carlan
Sounds like what the Mormons do. The take a person to James 1:5 and say to pray this verse and ask for wisdom and you’ll see that Joseph Smith was correct.
 
By the way another person taking the words of the Pope and twisting them to mean what they want them to mean.
I dont see that at all. In fact, he just expressed that he found the statements shocking, which is understandible. Most Protestants have been brought up with a deficient understanding of the Church. They cannot be assumed to understand such things. Protestantism departs further and futher almost daily from the Apostolic Church. It has gotten to the point where they don’t recognize it anymore, and think that the elements they have subtracted were actually “added” by Catholics.
The Pope never said that we bypass Jesus Christ and have Salvation BY Mary.
When one reads these statements and prayers outside of their context, it can certainly seem that way.
This is just a small example how when people do not understand things, turn it around, twist it, take such a beautiful truth and twist it with thier own hate for the Pope and his Church and our love for the Blessed Mother and try to make it ugly. What is the point of these things???:mad:
I did not see anyone twisting or making things ugly.

rinnie, if you are not willing or able to engage in reasonable discourse on these matters without getting so defensive and accusatory, maybre you need to avoid the non-catholic subforum. This is the place where such perspectives are explored. You may want to review the forum rules. They are quite clear that this section is for the exploration and discussion of differences. That mission is not furthered if you get mad when people disagree, or see things differently.

May God’s peace and tolerance be with you.
 
Unity is the fruit of adherance to the Truth. Every Catholic who learns his faith, and clings closely to Christ as the Head will be furthering the cause of ecumenism. Unity is not enhanced by ignoring the reasons for our divisions. It is possible to focus on the unity we share without compromising the Truth.

Look at Tweety for an example of this. One of the reasons that she is such a good role model for the Catholic parishioners is that she is absolutely dedicated to her faith. She does not just practice Christianity when she is at Church, like many do. She also feeds on the Word of God in Scripture daily, which most American Catholics don’t do. She lives her faith, and this is good for ecumenism. When we are all able to do this, we will find that unity is the result. Then the world will know Him through our love for one another.
I agree if we all strive to live our life as Tweety simply with love for one another and in a non- judgmental and non-selfrighteous way, it will go a long way to ecumenical unity.
 
You sound like there can be no sin nor any heterodoxy among Catholics. That is a silly, extremist position. The Catholic Church has had debates within itself (councils and parishes) for millenia now.

Jesus did not advocate mindless orthodoxy. His parables and teachings require hard thought. Even the apostles had disagreements in the very first “church”.
Disagreement and debate do not equate to heterodoxy. When one departs from the Apostolic teaching one is no longer Catholic. In the olden days, they called such persons “heretics”. Nowadays, we call them our separated brethren. 😃

Orthodoxy should not be mindless for any of us, but hard thought, study etc, does not mean one is free to depart from the faith.
 
You know what I am not confusing any thing for anything I am quite familiar with more of the Bible than you will ever think to be, I taught it for 8 years. I learn something new everyday, but not from someone like you.
Yet you do not name this so called indulgence that you “say” she paid for. The phrase the blind leading the blind comes to mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top