M
michaelp
Guest
Psalm45:9:
How do I know this?
4 The plural phrase “works of the law” would have to be understood in a different sense from the singular phrase “the work of the law” in 2:15.
Hope you understand. I just come in and say this because I have seen this fallacious interpretation of Paul’s use of the Law on this site and many others and thought that I would correct it.
Michael
The Romans weren’t Jews. This would have been meaningless to them if it referred only to the ceremonial aspects of the Mosaic law. It is exegetically implausible that this only refers to the ceremonial part of the law. It sets up a false dichotomy that no one would have recognized.We believe that too, the works of law St. Paul is referring to in his Epistle to the Romans is the Mosaic Law. He was criticizing the Jews who rejected the savior. Being circumcised, eating Kosher foods, and offering up animal sacrifices instead of offering up the perfect and eternal sacrifice of Calvary, etc. The mosaic law is not going to save you, because Christ’s crucifixion and resurrection has ended the Mosaic Law. Just like what St. John the Baptist said, “Do not presume to say to yourselves, `We have Abraham as our father’; for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham. Even now the axe is laid to the root of the trees.” (Matthew 3:9-10) Works of Law and good works are not the same thing. However, good works do not save us, but the infusing grace that comes through good works does.
How do I know this?
- Romans 2:15 says that the Gentiles have the works of the Law written on their heart and their conscience accuses or defends them concerning the Law. Do you really think that their conscience was accusing or defending them about circumcision, or ceremonial sacrifices, or the Passover, or the Feasts of Tabernacles? Of course not. Their conscience told them about the Ten commandments. There is not a reason to create the separation that you said above.
- Paul speak of the Law (nomos) again in Romans 7. Specifically to the Ten Commandments.
4 The plural phrase “works of the law” would have to be understood in a different sense from the singular phrase “the work of the law” in 2:15.
- Similar phrases involving the law in Romans (2:13, 14; 2:25, 26, 27; 7:25; 8:4; and 13:8) which are naturally related to the phrase “works of the law” cannot be taken to refer to circumcision (in fact, in 2:25 circumcision is explicitly contrasted with keeping the law). Those interpreters who reject the “narrow” interpretation of “works of the law” understand the phrase to refer to obedience to the Mosaic law in general.
Hope you understand. I just come in and say this because I have seen this fallacious interpretation of Paul’s use of the Law on this site and many others and thought that I would correct it.
Michael