"WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE? The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President."

  • Thread starter Thread starter a_priori
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I tend to lean toward an agenda much greater than proof of his birth. My personal opinion is that it is a direct challenge to the relevance of the constitution…

See the video by Alan Keyes:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=7787010&postcount=120

In the realm of globalism, no doubt the push for global citizenship and an eradication of borders necessitates a challenge to whether an American President has to be an American citizen. The withholding of said birth certificate (whether the president is a citizen or not) only sets precedence in the courts that such citizenship status need never be challenged in the future.

This forms a very different agenda then what most people interested in the topic are considering.
Never considered this…Interesting.
 
I have no doubt that Barack Obama has a valid US birth certificate. However the fact that they will not let anyone see it leads me to believe there is either some sort of religious designation, or a dual citizenship issue that has not been completely resolved. Seriously, if they would just publish a certified copy of it, this would all go away. The fact that they won’t does strike me as strange. However, I think the continued focus on it is getting silly at this point.
People have seen it. Copies have been published on the internet. It has been investigated and it remains an issue. Why? Because well meaning , and otherwise reasonable people can’t get over the fact that a BLACK man was elected president. Get over it. Do you want to see it? Do you? Really, do you want to see it?

factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

"We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as “supporting documents” to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.

Update, Nov. 1: The director of Hawaii’s Department of Health confirmed Oct. 31 that Obama was born in Honolulu.

Update Nov. 1: The Associated Press quoted Chiyome Fukino as saying that both she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama’s original birth certificate.

Fukino also was quoted by several other news organizations. The Honolulu Advertiser quoted Fukino as saying the agency had been bombarded by requests, and that the registrar of statistics had even been called in at home in the middle of the night.

Honolulu Advertiser, Nov. 1 2008: “This has gotten ridiculous,” state health director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said yesterday. “There are plenty of other, important things to focus on, like the economy, taxes, energy.” . . . Will this be enough to quiet the doubters? “I hope so,” Fukino said. “We need to get some work done.”

Fukino said she has “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."

There are photos on the site so you can see for yourself.
 
content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/04/obamas-sister-he-was-born-in-hawaii-get-over-it-/1?csp=obinsite

White House officials have been loath to address the “birther” issue in public, saying they don’t want to dignify false claims about President Obama’s birthplace.

Obama’s sister isn’t so reticent.

“I think it’s unfortunate – he was born in Hawaii, there is a tremendous amount of proof that has already been presented,” presidential sibling Maya Soetoro-Ng says on CNN’s Piers Morgan Tonight. “I think that it is time for people to put that to bed, put it to rest completely.”

The interview will air tonight.

In 2008, the Obama campaign released a copy of the certificate, saying the serial number was blacked out for concern over Hawaiian procedure. Since then, many news organizations and the Annenberg Fact Check Project saw the original with the serial number, an embossed seal and a stamped signature.
 
I don’t know for certain that he was born in the United States but I do believe him when he claims he was.
 
I understand that long-standing interpretation of the constitutional requirement of being a natural-born citizen holds that, in addition to being born on US soil, the parents must be US citizens at the time of the child’s birth. There is no question that Obama’s father was not a US citizen at any time which would seem to disqualify him outright, regardless of where he was born. As it is, we have as president a person who seems unrooted in the traditional American experience, having been raised as a “Jakarta street kid” and who knows what else? (all records are sealed). Ignoring the Constitution has far-reaching effects.
 
People have seen it. Copies have been published on the internet. It has been investigated and it remains an issue. Why? Because well meaning , and otherwise reasonable people can’t get over the fact that a BLACK man was elected president. Get over it. Do you want to see it? Do you? Really, do you want to see it?

factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

"We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as “supporting documents” to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.

Update, Nov. 1: The director of Hawaii’s Department of Health confirmed Oct. 31 that Obama was born in Honolulu.

Update Nov. 1: The Associated Press quoted Chiyome Fukino as saying that both she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama’s original birth certificate.

Fukino also was quoted by several other news organizations. The Honolulu Advertiser quoted Fukino as saying the agency had been bombarded by requests, and that the registrar of statistics had even been called in at home in the middle of the night.

Honolulu Advertiser, Nov. 1 2008: “This has gotten ridiculous,” state health director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said yesterday. “There are plenty of other, important things to focus on, like the economy, taxes, energy.” . . . Will this be enough to quiet the doubters? “I hope so,” Fukino said. “We need to get some work done.”

Fukino said she has “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."

There are photos on the site so you can see for yourself.
If all or any of the above is true, then there really is no reason NOT to provide the birth certificate.

So, what ARE they hiding?

Why do we need a “man of mystery” as President?

It may make for a great work of fiction or mystery, but why do we need a “man of mystery” as President.

All of the continued obfuscation sounds like “no news, here, folks, just keep moving. Nothing interesting here.”
 
I’m convinced.

[so what ARE they hiding? i need a birth certificate to get a passport. but not to run for president?]
 
OK. I believe her.

She is telling the absolute truth.

So, then, there should be no problem … release the birth certificate!

So, what is the problem with releasing the birth certificate?
 
I don’t have a position on this, but it was a CETIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH, NOT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE, THAT GEORGE SHOWED BACHMAN.

This is not evidence of Obama being born in America. Apparantly anybody can walk in to a hopital and get a certificate of live birth.

There are four different versions of Obama’s Live Birth certificate:

Image 1: images2.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg

Image 2: fightthesmears.com/images/28.jpg

Image 3: factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg

Image 4: factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg

Images #1 and 2 have a black bar, on the upper right of the COLB, instead of the certificate number. The certificate number in Images #3 and 4 is not blacked out. The number is 151 1961-010641.

Only Image #4 (Factcheck.org) has what appears to be an embossed seal of the State of Hawaii in the lower half of the certificate.

Neither Image #1 (Daily Kos), nor Image #2 (Fight the Smears), nor Image #3 (posted by the same Factcheck.org as Image #4) has the embossed seal.

If all four are Obama’s COLB, why are there these differences? How can any serious person be expected to accept an online image of a COLB as evidence of Obama’s American birth?

fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/4-versions-of-obamas-certificate-of-live-birth/

Just release the birth certificate and all people who question Obama’s birth place can be put right.

George needs to get his facts straight, Obama cut $500 billion from Medicare but the GOP is targettign seniors? George as a journalist or presentor should be impartial, he clearly is not.
 
George showed Bachman a CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH. NOT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

Not evidence of Obama being born in America. Apparantly anybody can walk in a hospital and get a certificate of live birth.

There are four different versions of Obama’s Live Birth certificate:

Image one: images2.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg

Image two: fightthesmears.com/images/28.jpg

Image three: factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg

Image four: factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg

Images #1 and 2 have a black bar, on the upper right of the COLB, instead of the certificate number. The certificate number in Images #3 and 4 is not blacked out. The number is 151 1961-010641.

Only Image #4 (Factcheck.org) has what appears to be an embossed seal of the State of Hawaii in the lower half of the certificate.

Neither Image #1 (Daily Kos), nor Image #2 (Fight the Smears), nor Image #3 (posted by the same Factcheck.org as Image #4) has the embossed seal.

If all four are Obama’s COLB, why are there these differences? How can any serious person be expected to accept an online image of a COLB as evidence of Obama’s American birth? If anyone tries to introduce these four online images — which are different from one another – as evidence in court, they’d be found at a minimum to be in contempt, or more likely be charged with outright fraud.

fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/4-versions-of-obamas-certificate-of-live-birth/

Release the birth certificate and all people who question Obama’s birth place can be put right.

George needs to get his facts straight, Obama cut $500 billion from Medicare but the GOP is targetting seniors? George as a journalist or presentor should be impartial, he clearly is not.
 
In the article Hawaii Govener says he met Obama as a baby but in a interview Abercrombie did with his friend and journalist Mike Evans, he says he first met Obama when Obama was about 6 at T Ball game.

Curiously too, when Evans asked Abercrombie when he first encountered the young Barack Obama, Abercrombie reportedly said, “I remember him playing in a T-Ball league,” when he was roughly five or six years old.

The reader may recall that Abercrombie had told the Los Angeles Times just before Christmas, “Maybe I’m the only one in the country that could look you right in the eye right now and tell you, ‘I was here when that baby was born.’”

A few days later, Abercrombie clarified to Mark Niesse of the Associated Press that he didn’t exactly see Obama’s parents with their newborn son at the hospital, but that he “remembers seeing Obama as a child with his parents at social events.” Of course, Obama Sr. had left for Harvard four years before young Barack was T-Ball eligible.

americanthinker.com/blog/2011/01/friend_says_abercrombie_to_him.html

:rolleyes:
 
In the article Hawaii Govener says he met Obama as a baby but in a interview Abercrombie did with his friend and journalist Mike Evans, he says he first met Obama when Obama was about 6 at T Ball game.

Curiously too, when Evans asked Abercrombie when he first encountered the young Barack Obama, Abercrombie reportedly said, “I remember him playing in a T-Ball league,” when he was roughly five or six years old.

The reader may recall that Abercrombie had told the Los Angeles Times just before Christmas, “Maybe I’m the only one in the country that could look you right in the eye right now and tell you, ‘I was here when that baby was born.’”

A few days later, Abercrombie clarified to Mark Niesse of the Associated Press that he didn’t exactly see Obama’s parents with their newborn son at the hospital, but that he “remembers seeing Obama as a child with his parents at social events.” Of course, Obama Sr. had left for Harvard four years before young Barack was T-Ball eligible.

americanthinker.com/blog/2011/01/friend_says_abercrombie_to_him.html

:rolleyes:
 
People have seen it. Copies have been published on the internet. It has been investigated and it remains an issue. Why? Because well meaning , and otherwise reasonable people can’t get over the fact that a BLACK man was elected president. Get over it. Do you want to see it? Do you? Really, do you want to see it?

factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

"We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as “supporting documents” to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.

Update, Nov. 1: The director of Hawaii’s Department of Health confirmed Oct. 31 that Obama was born in Honolulu.

Update Nov. 1: The Associated Press quoted Chiyome Fukino as saying that both she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama’s original birth certificate.

Fukino also was quoted by several other news organizations. The Honolulu Advertiser quoted Fukino as saying the agency had been bombarded by requests, and that the registrar of statistics had even been called in at home in the middle of the night.

Honolulu Advertiser, Nov. 1 2008: “This has gotten ridiculous,” state health director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said yesterday. “There are plenty of other, important things to focus on, like the economy, taxes, energy.” . . . Will this be enough to quiet the doubters? “I hope so,” Fukino said. “We need to get some work done.”

Fukino said she has “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."

There are photos on the site so you can see for yourself.
Not a birth certificate, a certificate of live birth which anybody can walk in to a hospital and get. That is not evidence of Obama being born in America. And it has nothing to do with the fact that Obama is Black. George Bush was asked to show his birth certificate.

There are four different versions of Obama’s Live Birth certificate:

Image one: images2.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg

Image two: fightthesmears.com/images/28.jpg

Image three: factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg

Image four: factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg

Images #1 and 2 have a black bar, on the upper right of the COLB, instead of the certificate number. The certificate number in Images #3 and 4 is not blacked out. The number is 151 1961-010641.

Only Image #4 (Factcheck.org) has what appears to be an embossed seal of the State of Hawaii in the lower half of the certificate.

Neither Image #1 (Daily Kos), nor Image #2 (Fight the Smears), nor Image #3 (posted by the same Factcheck.org as Image #4) has the embossed seal.

If all four are Obama’s COLB, why are there these differences? How can any serious person be expected to accept an online image of a COLB as evidence of Obama’s American birth? If anyone tries to introduce these four online images — which are different from one another – as evidence in court, they’d be found at a minimum to be in contempt, or more likely be charged with outright fraud.

fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/4-versions-of-obamas-certificate-of-live-birth/
 
I tend to lean toward an agenda much greater than proof of his birth. My personal opinion is that it is a direct challenge to the relevance of the constitution…

See the video by Alan Keyes:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=7787010&postcount=120

In the realm of globalism, no doubt the push for global citizenship and an eradication of borders necessitates a challenge to whether an American President has to be an American citizen. The withholding of said birth certificate (whether the president is a citizen or not) only sets precedence in the courts that such citizenship status need never be challenged in the future.

This forms a very different agenda then what most people interested in the topic are considering.
Good point! In addition, Barack Obama held double citizenship during his life, regardless of whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya.

He was a double citizen of the USA and Kenya until his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired, when he turned 21 years old and did nothing to re-instate that citizenship within 2 years of his 21st birthday. In addition, he may have held Indonesian citizenship as well.

So, we are also talking about setting a precedent here, former double and possibly triple citizens becoming presidents of the USA.
 
I tend to lean toward an agenda much greater than proof of his birth. My personal opinion is that it is a direct challenge to the relevance of the constitution…

See the video by Alan Keyes:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=7787010&postcount=120

In the realm of globalism, no doubt the push for global citizenship and an eradication of borders necessitates a challenge to whether an American President has to be an American citizen. The withholding of said birth certificate (whether the president is a citizen or not) only sets precedence in the courts that such citizenship status need never be challenged in the future.

This forms a very different agenda then what most people interested in the topic are considering.
In addition, since he never showed his passports and other documents, we can’t be sure whether he truly lost his Kenyan citizenship, and maybe he still continues to be a citizen of Indonesia, as well. We don’t know, because Congress did not investigate his status.

If it turns out, a few years from now, that Barack Obama not only held double or triple citizenship as a child, but he still was double or triple citizen when assuming the office of President of the USA, that will also set a precedent.
 
He has shown his birth certificate but conservatives keep claiming it’s a mock-up.

The Democrats could produce video footage of Obama being born…reel film from back in the day and the Tea Partiers would claim it’s phony and doctored.

We could all step into a time machine and soar back through time and stand there watching mom giving birth and hearing “we’ll call him…Barack!” and somehow the Tea Party would say it’s phony…

People will believe what they want to believe, period. That’s why conspiracy theories are just perfect to dupe people into a certain paranoia. It worked in Nazi Germany, worked with radical loons who believed that Bush blew up the Twin Towers to start a war, and it works in just about anything…sad that people still buy into this stuff…
True. If people spent half as much energy fighting abortion as spend on this nonsense, we might make some progress. Makes you wonder who’s really behind this “birther” silliness.
 
And while people waste time on this nonsense, millions of babies are being killed, we’re in danger of heading into another war, speculators are driving up gas prices just because they can, and Congress is threatening to make the U.S. a deadbeat debtor.

Very sensible.
 
I understand that long-standing interpretation of the constitutional requirement of being a natural-born citizen holds that, in addition to being born on US soil, the parents must be US citizens at the time of the child’s birth. There is no question that Obama’s father was not a US citizen at any time which would seem to disqualify him outright, regardless of where he was born.
You are misinformed. Chester Arthur’ eligibility was challenged, and courts ruled that he was eligible; his Irish father was not naturalized until he was 14.
As it is, we have as president a person who seems unrooted in the traditional American experience, having been raised as a “Jakarta street kid” and who knows what else? (all records are sealed). Ignoring the Constitution has far-reaching effects.
He does not in any way appear to have grown up as a “street kid;” this is really too much of an exaggeration, a slander against the nation and against his mother.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top