"WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE? The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President."

  • Thread starter Thread starter a_priori
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The first one has already been certified by the state of Hawaii as being authentic, and by CNN, ABC, NBC and Factcheck.org.
If you go to google and type - whois factcheck.org
This is what comes up:
Registrant Name:kyle cassidy
Registrant Organization:annenberg public policy center
Registrant Street1:3620 walnut st.
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:philadelphia
Registrant State/Province:pa

Here’s the Obama connection if you are interested. It’s up to you to decide if it means anything. Like people said above Annenberg has befriended Republicans as well.

CNN - Ayers and Obama crossed paths on boards, records show.
cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/o…

"A review of board minutes and records by CNN show Obama crossed paths repeatedly with Ayers at board meetings of the Annenberg Challenge Project.

The Annenberg Foundation gave the project a $50 million grant to match local private funds to improve schools, and Ayers fought to bring the grant to Chicago, according to participants and project records.

The project’s organizing committee asked Obama to serve as the board chairman in 1995. Annenberg Project Executive Director Ken Rollings said Ayers was not a member of that ad hoc group when the decision was made.

For seven years, Ayers and Obama – among many others – worked on funding for education projects, including some projects advocated by Ayers.

“The specific job of the board of directors was to give out the money.,” said Stanley Kurtz, a conservative researcher for the Ethics and Public Policy Center and frequent Obama critic.

“Instead of giving money directly to schools, they gave money to what they call external partners and these partners were often pretty radical community organizer groups,” said Kurtz, who also has been reviewing the Annenberg Challenge’s recently released records.

The board, for example, gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to Bill Ayers’ small schools project. The project promoted alternative education, including projects like the Peace School – where the curriculum centered on a United Nations theme – and another school where the focus was African-American studies.

The funding, according to Kurtz and records CNN reviewed, came directly from the Annenberg foundation which Obama chaired. The project shut down in 2003 after achieving “little impact on school improvement and student outcomes,” its final report stated.

While working on the Annenberg project, Obama and Ayers also served together on a second charitable foundation, the Woods Fund. It was that foundation that Obama referenced in the debate – not the Annenberg Challenge.

Among Wood Foundation recipients were the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church, where Obama attended and was married; and the Children and Family Justice Center, where Ayers’ wife Dohrn was director."

I wonder If it’s a reliable source about Mr.Obama?

Same reason I don’t use FightTheSmears ,
The second one you present is probably fraudulant and or longer used by the state of Hawaii.
Sounds like a conspiracy theorist, to me.Can you prove it fraudulent?
 
Except you have to provide the source for your information when you post it. I know, I corrected an error in wikipedia about Pope John Paul II.

Here, watch the video to the end and see the birth certificate that Stephanopoulos shows to Michele Bachmann. She accepted it as real.

youtube.com/watch?v=Nb7cm00a7cA

Jim
Actually, I’m not allowed to do UTUBES…BUT I did read the transcript.🙂

Mr S showed her what? This one?

http://forums.catholic-questions.org/picture.php?albumid=1281&pictureid=8952

Or this one:

http://forums.catholic-questions.org/picture.php?albumid=1281&pictureid=8953
 
If you go to google and type - whois factcheck.org
This is what comes up:
Registrant Name:kyle cassidy
Registrant Organization:annenberg public policy center
Registrant Street1:3620 walnut st.
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:philadelphia
Registrant State/Province:pa

Here’s the Obama connection if you are interested. It’s up to you to decide if it means anything. Like people said above Annenberg has befriended Republicans as well.

CNN - Ayers and Obama crossed paths on boards, records show.
cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/o…

"A review of board minutes and records by CNN show Obama crossed paths repeatedly with Ayers at board meetings of the Annenberg Challenge Project.

The Annenberg Foundation gave the project a $50 million grant to match local private funds to improve schools, and Ayers fought to bring the grant to Chicago, according to participants and project records.

The project’s organizing committee asked Obama to serve as the board chairman in 1995. Annenberg Project Executive Director Ken Rollings said Ayers was not a member of that ad hoc group when the decision was made.

For seven years, Ayers and Obama – among many others – worked on funding for education projects, including some projects advocated by Ayers.

“The specific job of the board of directors was to give out the money.,” said Stanley Kurtz, a conservative researcher for the Ethics and Public Policy Center and frequent Obama critic.

“Instead of giving money directly to schools, they gave money to what they call external partners and these partners were often pretty radical community organizer groups,” said Kurtz, who also has been reviewing the Annenberg Challenge’s recently released records.

The board, for example, gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to Bill Ayers’ small schools project. The project promoted alternative education, including projects like the Peace School – where the curriculum centered on a United Nations theme – and another school where the focus was African-American studies.

The funding, according to Kurtz and records CNN reviewed, came directly from the Annenberg foundation which Obama chaired. The project shut down in 2003 after achieving “little impact on school improvement and student outcomes,” its final report stated.

While working on the Annenberg project, Obama and Ayers also served together on a second charitable foundation, the Woods Fund. It was that foundation that Obama referenced in the debate – not the Annenberg Challenge.

Among Wood Foundation recipients were the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church, where Obama attended and was married; and the Children and Family Justice Center, where Ayers’ wife Dohrn was director."

I wonder If it’s a reliable source about Mr.Obama?

Same reason I don’t use FightTheSmears ,

Sounds like a conspiracy theorist, to me.Can you prove it fraudulent?
The Annenberg project in Chicago has nothing to do with the Annenberg group in PA which runs factcheck.org.

Also, Obama’s connection to Ayers and Rev Wright has nothing to do with whether he was born in the USA or not.

We need to be careful as Christians, that we’re not promoting lies pushed by people from blog sites who have an agenda that is not Christian.

We become culpable in their deeds should they be evil.

Jim
 
Joseph, thank you for getting the the heart of the issue. I think that the birthers are semi-misguided in their efforts, not to prove where the President was born, but rather where his loyalties lie. A very relevant case can be made that Obama’s loyalties do NOT lie with America as a country and its people, but rather with an ideology centered on globalized power and control. and the desire to subjegate America to that central power. Now, I think he does this because he sincerely believes that America is just another country along with several hundred other countries and they should all act and behave the same way. We are no better than anyone else and have no reason to be treated with any favor over anyone else. This flies in the face with the personal opinion that most “birthers” have in that America is an exceptional place because of what we are, because of our government system of restricted government that allows for maximum personal liberty and the right to pursue ones dreams and goals.
👍👍

I, personally, don’t believe there will be found anything particularly nefarious.

Instead, I think it’s as simple as like this:
I honestly and truly believe this solves the entire mystery.
It is seriously this straightforward.
  • Obama was indeed born in Hawaii in 1961
  • Obama was indeed adopted by Lolo Soetoro in the 1970s
  • Obama’s name was indeed changed to Barry Soetoro in the 1970s
  • Obama’s birth certificate was altered per Hawaiian law to reflect his new name in the 1970s
  • Obama never changed his name back to “Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.” — most likely because he used “Barry Soetoro” on all of his student aid applications for college, and probably received foreign student grants and admissions assistance playing off his years living in Indonesia
  • All the records, transcripts, documents, and paperwork Obama continues to hide from the public is all hidden because it lists his name as “Barry Soetoro” on all of it.
  • Obama will not allow his birth certificate to be released because it lists the “wrong” name on it: Barry Soetoro
It is as simple as this, folks.
 
The Annenberg project in Chicago has nothing to do with the Annenberg group in PA which runs factcheck.org.
Hmmmm…
Also, Obama’s connection to Ayers and Rev Wright has nothing to do with whether he was born in the USA or not.
Quite true.
We need to be careful as Christians, that we’re not promoting lies pushed by people from blog sites who have an agenda that is not Christian.
We become culpable in their deeds should they be evil.
Questioning associations is not being culpable and that was from a CNN investigation.
 
to get off topic slightly

It’s called jamming and it’s a common political tool on the internet. A news fact can be fogged by flooding the internet with easily discredited articles and websites about the subject in an attempt to frustrate or confuse interested parties. The tactic only needs to be seeded, and there are enough mentally unstable and gullible people who will contribute to the pot by posting their own articles and interpretations. Eventually, it snowballs and the truth gets hidden in the search engine. The articles that do the most harm are the ones that contain most of the truth but contain a smidgen of false information. For example, an article may be one hundred percent right, but the guy who wrote the article has 15 other articles on his web page claiming Obama is from Jupiter.

The whole point is to frustrate or turn people off from searching for actual facts.
👍👍
 
So, it looks like the President of the United States is still a “man of mystery”.
 
Certificates have changed through the years. The first one here is typed and obviously issued a long time ago. The one below is computer generated.

There’s a vast difference between the birth certificate my husband was issued in 1967 and the one he was issued in 2009.
 
I’m appalled that people are even wasting time arguing about this issue. It is so embarrassing to be Catholic and find this a topic seriously being discussed on this forum. Obama’s documents have met the legal litmus test - SO GET OVER IT!

If you want to fight the culture wars, then fight them with a leader who shows some moral integrity. Donald Trump has THREE WIVES and is therefore a serial adulterer - WHICH IS A MORTAL SIN that Jesus SPECIFICALLY addresses in the Gospels as a VIOLATION of GOD’S WILL. The fact that he LOVES this issue should be a RED FLAG to anyone trying to figure out where the DEVIL is acting in politics. I do not believe SATAN draws the line between RED and BLUE - he acts on both sides, and nothing pleases him more than to get otherwise virtuous people to follow along with one of his schemes.

Republican Catholics should be seriously worried about the fact that the Republican party has yet to produce a leader with any moral integrity who is willing to run for President. Why do you think that is? I am not impressed with the current field at all.
The media has a significant influence over public opinion, and as such, would shred a pro-life republican as being against women’s right to choose. Case closed.
 
IT would be so simple to just show the thing and settle this. Either way, imagine the deception going on here.
 
Certificates have changed through the years. The first one here is typed and obviously issued a long time ago. The one below is computer generated.

There’s a vast difference between the birth certificate my husband was issued in 1967 and the one he was issued in 2009.
I think Kimmielittle is trying to make a point that the top certificate is an example of an original Birth Certificate (or long form BC). I work with genealogy, and I can tell you that they haven’t changed that much over the past 150 years (regardless of location).
 
Certificates have changed through the years. The first one here is typed and obviously issued a long time ago. The one below is computer generated.

There’s a vast difference between the birth certificate my husband was issued in 1967 and the one he was issued in 2009.
Actually, the top one is what people are calling the “Long Form”. If you notice it has places for the documentation of attending physicians signatures etc… and such.

The second one Is basically a Certificate - that a Certificate exists.
 
I think Kimmielittle is trying to make a point that the top certificate is an example of an original Birth Certificate (or long form BC). I work with genealogy, and I can tell you that they haven’t changed that much over the past 150 years (regardless of location).
I guess it’s different in the US. In my province the only difference between the long-form birth certificate and the certificate that most people carry is that the parents’ names are on the long-form. My birth certificate only shows my name and the location and date of my birth.
 
I think Kimmielittle is trying to make a point that the top certificate is an example of an original Birth Certificate (or long form BC). I work with genealogy, and I can tell you that they haven’t changed that much over the past 150 years (regardless of location).
👍👍
 
IT would be so simple to just show the thing and settle this. Either way, imagine the deception going on here.
👍👍

Herein is my biggest problem:
“Transparency and Open Government: My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.” - Barack Obama
 
I guess it’s different in the US. In my province the only difference between the long-form birth certificate and the certificate that most people carry is that the parents’ names are on the long-form. My birth certificate only shows my name and the location and date of my birth.
Yeppers!!! It’s different in the states:)

My Grandpas in 1946 looks like the top one only different state
 
Let’s just beat this dead horse pass the point of hash into the realm of puree. :pshaw:
 
Let’s just beat this dead horse pass the point of hash into the realm of puree. :pshaw:
Well.l.ll.l…It would be a dead horse - IF - Mr.Obama felt that the Presidency like every other Political Office / Representative be at least fundamentally transparent with the people who he represents.

I take it, you aren’t in favor of his being transparent?

One of the platforms HE CHOSE to run on is this one:
“Transparency and Open Government: My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.” - Barack Obama
Should that platform not apply to the preacher?
 
Let’s just beat this dead horse pass the point of hash into the realm of puree. :pshaw:
After which we can get back to the really very important, absolutely vital question of…who wrote Shakespeare’s plays:rolleyes:
 
I guess it’s different in the US. In my province the only difference between the long-form birth certificate and the certificate that most people carry is that the parents’ names are on the long-form. My birth certificate only shows my name and the location and date of my birth.
Do a search on Google Images for: genealogy birth certificates.

You will find numerous examples. Marriage and death certificates also have a wealth of valuable genealogical information. Family tree researchers would be lost without them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top