Which "Catholic authors" do you think we need to steer clear of?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karen1996
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Contarini;1796415:
Nope, Dostoevsky isn’t a nihilist. Some of his characters are, though (I’m thinking of the Underground Man. Haven’t read The Demons
.) He uses them to show the problems brought by ‘enlightement’.

Fair enough. I haven’t read *Notes from Underground. The Demons *is fascinating because in many ways it foreshadows what would happen in Russia in the 20th century.

Edwin
 
First off, his books are not pornographic as the interview claims. Not all sex is pornographic, and anyway, it is not even that bad. He uses it as a sign of God’s love.

It also says “Aging hippy whos actions are not consistant with the orfained priesthood.”
Who is to judge him? The name calling and quick judgement really shows more of the character of the article’s author than Father Greeley’s.

Again, they call him names, after the quote frm Greeley. Where does Father Greeley state that voting pro choice is ok? He does not. He states that we do not have to vote on one issue.

As to Bishop Bruskewitz’s statement (“No Catholics of any sense will take any pastoral advice from Father Andrew Greeley, a superficial writer who appears to spend his time promoting himself to various elements in the secular media.)

Again, they first felt the need to attack Father Greeley, before getting around to the argument.

A very biased article.
 
:eek:

If you had any idea of the staggering number of books out there, books produced by polished casuists on every conceivable subject that are quite deliberately designed to poison your mind, you wouldn’t say things like that.
I don’t know what “casuists” are, and I’m not sure if this is what the original poster had in mind, but I think he/she meant that a book shouldn’t be avoided on account of the author’s personal beliefs. Reading a book by a feminist wouldn’t turn me into a feminist, just as reading a book by a Satanist wouldn’t turn me into a Satanist. God gave us the power to think for ourselves. Just because we read something that is against our beliefs doesn’t mean we automatically accepts it. It also wouldn’t hurt to know what people who do not share our values write about.

That being said, I don’t doubt that there are a lot of books that are not worth reading. For example, The Lovely Bones starts out okay, but it becomes insanely pointless after the murderer dies. I also never like books by Nicholas Sparks. He is not a Catholic, but he is a Christian. Most of his books are trite and manipulative, and should therefore be avoided.

I’m not too sure about the religious background of the following authors, but they also should be avoided because they write terrible books:
  • Audrey Niffenegger (author of The Time Traveler’s Wife, which is an exceptionally pointless and terrible book)
  • Mitch Albom (another manipulative writer who tries to be inspiring when he’s simply stating the obvious)
  • Frank MacCourt (whine, whine, whine; he’s definitely Catholic, by the way)
  • Gregory Maguire (writes spin-offs of well-known fairy tales, which results in multiple dull books with predictable endings)
There’s more, but I’ll have to dig up my list later.
I’m sure you are all very faithful and don’t doubt your faith; but can you really say that if you recommend certain books that are not in accord with our Catholic faith to someone, that the “someone” will not have any doubts whatsoever? You don’t know for sure what will go on in the minds of different people no matter how well you know someone. I would rather just play it safe and not recommend any books that are questionable to anyone.
Many books published today are so horrendous from a literary standpoint that when I find a well-written book I get all excited and would recommend it to anyone. I’m sure The Count of Monte Cristo contains some “questionable” episodes, but it is one fine book as a whole. Definitely worth reading.
 
Ah man…this brings back way too many memories. I am french and this book has always been a source of wonder and awe…

‘L’important c’est la rose’
I just purchased this book. It was recommended to me by a preist. I was surprised when I asked for help finding it at the book store, the woman told me it was for young readers 9 - 12 years old.

I bought it anyway - I figured my spiritual director recommended it for a reason.
 
I am one day going to write a book called “Why Gary Wills is not a Catholic”.
Our former Catholic bookstore stocked “The Red Tent” by Anita Diamante. My wife read that when she was wiccan. It was highly recommended by a fellow wiccan. Apparently the bookstore owner was stocking it because some fruity nuns in town were reading it for their book club. Try to act surprised.
 
I also never like books by Nicholas Sparks. He is not a Catholic, but he is a Christian. Most of his books are trite and manipulative, and should therefore be avoided.
  • Audrey Niffenegger (author of The Time Traveler’s Wife, which is an exceptionally pointless and terrible book)
I believe Nicholas Sparks is Catholic. He states he is in his autobiography/travel memoir, Three Weeks With My Brother, written with his brother, Micah Sparks. But I agree with you on his books. They’re so predictable.

And The Time Traveler’s Wife…gag! It was so horrible, I threw it away.
 
I just purchased this book. It was recommended to me by a preist. I was surprised when I asked for help finding it at the book store, the woman told me it was for young readers 9 - 12 years old.

I bought it anyway - I figured my spiritual director recommended it for a reason.
Code:
This book is great for young readers but the depth is far-overreaching into our own age! It can be enjoyed by ALL readers…but especially for those who want to grow in all aspects of their life! It is touching to be sure…so…your spiritual director has great taste and discernment and wisdom! Please say hello to him for me as I pray for him everyday (all priests) on the forum…:yup:
 
Rach620;1791282 said:
😃 Definitely fiction as it ought to be–in its beauty, we can glimpse the beauty of He who is every word (and the Word’s!) Author.

Dostoevsky a nihilist? You have badly misread him. Did you read *The Demons *
(sometimes translated as The Posessed)?

Or perhaps I misunderstood you.

Edwin

You misread both of them… the quote above wasn’t me 🙂

The second one was more of the nightmares of plugging thru those overworded blah blah blahs and trying to analyze it while taking 4 other classes. Mother of Mercy Dostoevsky put me to sleep. Hard to write papers and read other things when your knee deep into a Russian writer coma. 🙂

Right now, I’m up to my eyeballs in textbooks and research items. Hence my choice of escapism… I mean when you’re reading books in which it is quite possible that the Oxford English Dictionary is sponsoring, or at least getting paid by the syllable, reading some fluff is a nice change of pace on break.

Truth be told, I just go to Barnes and Nobles and see what’s a best seller. If the cover is pink, I’m sold 🙂
 
well they are not fiction either:D …If I want to read a biography I guess I could read about one of the Saints…but biographys and history do not interest me:(
St. Francis de Sales wrote “An Introduction to the Devout life” Really, it reads like a genius decided to write a real self help book. If you are Catholic and pragmatic, this is a must read. I read bits and pieces while I am dining out or waiting in my car somewhere.
 
St. Francis de Sales wrote “An Introduction to the Devout life” Really, it reads like a genius decided to write a real self help book. If you are Catholic and pragmatic, this is a must read. I read bits and pieces while I am dining out or waiting in my car somewhere.
Oh thank you…this sounds great…
tomorrow it is off to the bookstore!
 
First off, his books are not pornographic as the interview claims. Not all sex is pornographic, and anyway, it is not even that bad. He uses it as a sign of God’s love.
I’m not sure the books are pornographic (that’s a matter of definition), but the attitude to sex is too gushy for my taste. Generally Greeley is best as a satirist or a sympathetic chronicler of human weakness–when he writes about things he admires (which includes sex, though that doesn’t mean he is getting any–in fact I think the starry-eyed way he writes about it is probably a testimony to his chastity) he goes over the top.

For my money, Greeley and Ralph McInerny are more or less on a level as novelists (I’m speaking in a literary sense). If anything, McInerny is better (in the sense of being more professional with fewer weaknesses), but Greeley is more interesting. Both have a problem with getting on the soapbox, though they are different soapboxes.

Edwin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top