A
ahimsaman72
Guest
![40.png](https://forums.catholic-questions.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/e95f7d/40.png)
Actually, I would trust 2000 years of factual and ancient New Testament manuscripts that were written by the apostles and eyewitnesses as they were guided and inspired by the Holy Spirit to write. Those manuscripts have changed little in that amount of time and have no other agenda but to proclaim the true gospel of Jesus Christ. God-breathed Scripture has no ulterior motives. Men who came after the Scripture was written had agendas and ulterior motives and lacked authority to proclaim official Christian doctrines as the Roman Church has done.I would trust 2000 years of interpretation through apostles, profits, and saints over you. This intrepatation has not changed in the BODY of the church. You may have heard Catholics themselves interpreting it different, but the Church itself has not misinterpretated it because it was handed to her through Paul the first pope of the RC church, whom Jesus entrusted. Who backs all the interpretations you have?
Paul wrote the majority of the New Testament and the gospel he presented through the Holy Spirit is different than the gospel espoused by the Roman Church. He and the other writers of the New Testament explained the truth as the Holy Spirit led them. Scripture has no equal and needs no interpreter. Whether you accept it or not, you have interpretations, I have interpretations, the Pope has interpretations, we all have interpretations. Does interpretation equal sin or silliness or non-truth? No.