M
manualman
Guest
news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/protestors-behind-occupy-wall-street-want-133222625.html
I find this interesting and I’m concerned that the spin doctors are quickly trying to create an image here that this is an equal and opposite reaction to the Tea Party phenomenon.
I strongly disagree. I think there is an enormous amount of room in politics for people to be disgusted with BOTH excessive government spending and intrusion into people’s daily lives AND disgusted with the machinations of the Wall Street elite who constantly dream up new schemes for screwing Americans out of their money.
Myself, I’d happily claim membership in BOTH movements. I’d like LESS government bureacracy, agencies, red tape and obstructionism, less government funding of dubious programs, grants, handouts and giveaways to the well connected, less military spending.
I’d also be quite happy to see tax structures changed to place higher burdens on larger companies than exist on smaller ones. I’d favor a constitutional amendment to eliminate the ‘personhood’ status currently enjoyed by corporations in order to limit their political activities. I don’t see why we need a huge agency to review and deny merger requests when they clearly would create corporations “too large to fail.” And so on.
It’s not at all clear to me that this movement is a groundswell demanding that the wealth of the rich be seized and given away to the poor. What I see in everday Americans is disgust with the insider’s club on Wall Street that takes care of each other first and let’s the actual stockholders have the leftovers, when there are any.
I find this interesting and I’m concerned that the spin doctors are quickly trying to create an image here that this is an equal and opposite reaction to the Tea Party phenomenon.
I strongly disagree. I think there is an enormous amount of room in politics for people to be disgusted with BOTH excessive government spending and intrusion into people’s daily lives AND disgusted with the machinations of the Wall Street elite who constantly dream up new schemes for screwing Americans out of their money.
Myself, I’d happily claim membership in BOTH movements. I’d like LESS government bureacracy, agencies, red tape and obstructionism, less government funding of dubious programs, grants, handouts and giveaways to the well connected, less military spending.
I’d also be quite happy to see tax structures changed to place higher burdens on larger companies than exist on smaller ones. I’d favor a constitutional amendment to eliminate the ‘personhood’ status currently enjoyed by corporations in order to limit their political activities. I don’t see why we need a huge agency to review and deny merger requests when they clearly would create corporations “too large to fail.” And so on.
It’s not at all clear to me that this movement is a groundswell demanding that the wealth of the rich be seized and given away to the poor. What I see in everday Americans is disgust with the insider’s club on Wall Street that takes care of each other first and let’s the actual stockholders have the leftovers, when there are any.