who is the anti-christ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flame_of_Christ
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
schaick said:
Don’t you find that a bit scary, very odd, interesting?
Click to expand...
No. I find it stupid. Besides, your first link’s busted. =_=
Honestly. The Euro symbol? The only thing that comes to my mind when I see it is MONEY! (Can I have some please!? D’8)

It’s also the thing I know many of my overseas countrymen are pouring sweat for because their homeland is too bloody poor to give 'em a decent job. :rolleyes:

A little off-topic but God am I with you on this one! DX I can’t stand snobby, self-proclaimed “animation critics” who decry me having a poor taste in cartoons. Their reason? “Not enough keyframes. Not fast enough. Not fluid enough. snorts” These blokes literally worship Disney animation but turn a blind eye to just how utterly generic, sappy, cliche, and ultimately childish a majority of their animated films (particularly the classic ones like Snow White and Sleeping Beauty) are story-wise. Heck, their simplicity and short plots make them even more generic than Japanese shounen manga.
 
Mosacked said:
Dokimas, you don’t have to THINK to know who is the Anti-Christ.

Christians don’t THINK FOR God. They OBEY.

1 John 2:22 Who is the Liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Messiah. **Such a man is the Antichrist—he denies the Father (God) and the Son (Jesus). **

muslimsopenyoureyes.blogspot.com

.
Click to expand...
Or you could also say: 1 John 2:22 Who is the Liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Messiah. **Such a man is the Antichrist—he denies the Father (God) and the Word (Son/Jesus). **

It can be one that denies the Word, meaning that it disobeys the Word of God.

Jesus is the Word, in case you didn’t know.
 
The man of perdition. But you can’t take the book of revelations as literal fact. There would be far too many indefensible positions that would be implied. The " left behind " series, for instance, is completely non-biblical, because it assumes some parts of the book of revelations are true, while simply ignoring those which would not lead to any other conclusion or understanding of what revelations means.
 
traillius said:
The man of perdition. But you can’t take the book of revelations as literal fact. There would be far too many indefensible positions that would be implied. The " left behind " series, for instance, is completely non-biblical, because it assumes some parts of the book of revelations are true, while simply ignoring those which would not lead to any other conclusion or understanding of what revelations means.
Click to expand...
I agree. The doctrine of a ‘second chance’ is a very dangerous doctrine.
 
Dokimas said:
I don’t think Benny Hinn is the anti-christ. I don’t think we can figure it out yet. I think he is hidden from view (knowledge) right now.

I don’t think water baptism save anyone. It is the baptism of Jesus that saves and that baptism has to do with the Holy Spirit. Peter spoke of baptism saving and he qualified that by saying not the type that has to do with cleaning off dirt (by implication: water baptism).​

Thank you for asking.
Click to expand...
DoKimas, Do you think at baptism you are remove of all sin
 
Bill_Pick said:
DoKimas, Do you think at baptism you are remove of all sin
Click to expand...
Actually at baptism, from a point of view, you don’t remove your sins, but somehow pay your sins. You die. The penalty of sin is death. Sin is payed. Then God gives you power to resurrect ‘spiritually’. From a certain point of view, Christ let’s us die and then He resurrects us.

Of course, that is from a point of view. From another perspective, Christ pays for your sins.
 
Mosacked said:
Dokimas, you don’t have to THINK to know who is the Anti-Christ.

Christians don’t THINK FOR God. They OBEY. Sorry for being so blunt but … NO DUH!!

1 John 2:22 Who is the Liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Messiah. **Such a man is the Antichrist—he denies the Father (God) and the Son (Jesus). ** This doesn’t tell us WHO but what. We still don’t know who.

muslimsopenyoureyes.blogspot.com

.
Click to expand...
 
Dokimas said:
Originally Posted by Mosacked View Post
Dokimas, you don’t have to THINK to know who is the Anti-Christ.

Christians don’t THINK FOR God. They OBEY.

You: Sorry for being so blunt but … NO DUH!!
Me: That’s why some are not sheep, they’re goats.

1 John 2:22 Who is the Liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Messiah. Such a man is the Antichrist—he denies the Father (God) and the Son (Jesus).

You: This doesn’t tell us WHO but what. We still don’t know who.
Me: Someone tells you those large animals with a trunk nose & big ears are elephants and you say…it doesn’t tell us WHO but what…I still don’t know who. Again, that’s why some have eyes but cannot see.

muslimsopenyoureyes.blogspot.com

.
Click to expand...
 
Mosacked said:
And this is bigotry?

1 John 2:22 Who is the Liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Messiah. Such a man is the Antichrist—he denies the Father (God) and the Son (Jesus).

And we ALL know that islam denies the deity of Jesus.

So, are you really a catholic?
.
Click to expand...
He is right. It is just Bigotry. Jews deny that Jesus is the Messiah. As do Atheist and Buddist and Shintoist. Are they the Anti-Christ as well. No It is going to be a single person.
 
Rsiewell said:
He is right. It is just Bigotry. Jews deny that Jesus is the Messiah. As do Atheist and Buddist and Shintoist. Are they the Anti-Christ as well. No It is going to be a single person.
Click to expand...
If Obama says he is the president, but another refuses to believe he is president, does that make the man anti-president? Surely not. He merely refuses to believe that Obama is the president.

BUT…if Obama says he is the president, and the man says that Obama cannot be the president because he thinks the presidency does not exist and then he goes on to qualify why Obama should not be president. Does that make him Anti-President? Common sense tells you that it is a YES!

If you have a problem qualifying another to fit the definition despite such clear instructions, then you are not a follower of the faith nor a follower of the one who wrote the instruction. You are an enemy of the faith, and in this case an enemy of the Holy Bible.

muslimsopenyoureyes.blogspot.com

.
 
Under that context atheist could still be the anti christ but you are simply singling out one group
 
40.png
Mosacked:
Thanks, Mosacked, for your opinion, but no thanks.
 
You should sing from my hymnal more often. Sounds pretty good, doesn’t it?😃
 
Is there really going to be a time when the world will have one Anti-Christ government and should we as catholics be wary of that time?

Are we to prepare for this and “watch for the signs” or should we not bother?
 
Do you detest cheap shots against protestant and protestant understandings as I am against cheap shots against catholics and their teaching? Of course disagreeing and showing reasons from the Bible for disagreement is not cheap shots, correct?
 
Flame_of_Christ said:
Is there really going to be a time when the world will have one Anti-Christ government and should we as catholics be wary of that time?

Are we to prepare for this and “watch for the signs” or should we not bother?
Click to expand...

IMO, the Bible teaches that there will be a one world gov’t headed by one person that is doing the bidding of Satan.​

Don’t take the mark of the beast. Stay true to the teachings of Jesus.
 
Flame_of_Christ said:
Is there really going to be a time when the world will have one Anti-Christ government and should we as catholics be wary of that time?

Are we to prepare for this and “watch for the signs” or should we not bother?
Click to expand...
Yes Brother you are right we should watch for the signs.

The wise watch.

Our Government is under increasing pressure not to open parliament with The Lords Prayer.

Your post shows great wisdom in using catholic not Catholic.

Blessings to you and yours pray well and stay well
 
Dokimas said:
Do you detest cheap shots against protestant and protestant understandings as I am against cheap shots against catholics and their teaching? Of course disagreeing and showing reasons from the Bible for disagreement is not cheap shots, correct?
Click to expand...
For someone who merely brushed aside his rejection of the definition of the Anti-Christ as provided for in the Holy Bible, your above statement reeks of odious hypocrisy.

1 John 2:22 Who is the Liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Messiah. **Such a man is the Antichrist—he denies the Father (God) and the Son (Jesus).
**

muslimsopenyoureyes.blogspot.com

.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top