K
kimmielittle
Guest
It is not unreasonable to expect 18 year olds to vote - serve in armed forces AND be accountable.I can’t answer for that poster, but it seems that in Europe and elsewhere, “youth” are considered to be anybody age 25 or younger. One can buy “youth” tickets for transit and museums at cheaper rates if under 26.
I don’t think that 26 is necessarily an arbitrary number either. It is increasingly common that youth must stay in college longer (or return for more education) to earn a degree and may have greater difficulty finding long-term full-time employment which should offer health benefits. It is also becoming well-known that children do not achieve full rational maturity until about age 25 when the pre-frontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for abstract decisioning and higher-moral-level reasoning, finishes development. (Statistically this makes sense when you note that auto insurance rates for 25-year-olds drop; they can perceive and judge situations on the road and respond in ways that are safer driving behaviors.)
So yes, I think that if children are entitled to health care through the full range of their development, it is not unreasonable to insure them through age 26.
Go AWOL at 18 -19- 20 … And see if you aren’t held responsible.
Why should mommies pay for your insurance They Mommies ] don’t get it free ]?
The ONLY excuse I see is Special Needs Dependants.
Buy your reasoning - Mommies should be required to pay auto insurance on 26 year olds.
Remember, this is ** Non Dependant Adults **