D
DRIVING_BEAR
Guest
First off jews make up 1/3 of nobel prize winners in the math and science fields
Second the original question was not Anti semitic .
Second the original question was not Anti semitic .
Marx’s long term inheritance was Jewish, and very strongly so. His father turned to Lutheranism for purely pragmatic reasons, due to a Prussian edict denying Jews entrance to the bar, and he was a lawyer. In other words, he became “Christian” not for reasons of faith, but simple pragmatism. Nor is there any evidence they practised their new “religion”.Pastor Wurmbrand’s definition of a Jew seems to be ‘someone descended from someone of the Jewish religion(s)’. Marx was not Jew. he did nt identify as a Jew, was not raised as a Jew, and his parents were Christians. As for Lenin being a 'half-Jew" - How can you be a half-Jew?
“Isaac Deutscher (1959)[17] compares Marx with Elisha ben Abuyah, Baruch Spinoza, Heinrich Heine, Rosa Luxemburg, Leon Trotsky, and Sigmund Freud, all of whom he thinks of as heretics who transcend Jewry, and yet still belong to a Jewish tradition. According to Deutscher, Marx’s “idea of socialism and of the classless and stateless society” expressed in the essay is as universal as Spinoza’s ethics and God.”
The Catholic church also condemns replacement theology or supersessionism. God has committed Himself to blessing the nation of Israel in spite of her unfaithfulness.I’m pretty sure this is heterodox. The Church is the New Israel, and the Old Covenant has been abrogated and superseded. This has been the constant teaching of the Church since the late first century, when, after the Temple fell, the remaining Jews did not accept the Messiah had come and went to work building a new religion, Rabbinic Judaism.
The only groups that I know of that think Jews are still the chosen people are dispensationalist, end-times fanatical Protestants, and Orthodox Jews. Not even Reformed Jews believe Jews are the chosen people!
I see that you are an Ex-Muslim Melkite, so I think it is better not to dwell into it for it is sensitive. I guess God did not left His People. I have justification for that, but I prefer not to deal with a sensitive subject.I’m pretty sure this is heterodox. The Church is the New Israel, and the Old Covenant has been abrogated and superseded. This has been the constant teaching of the Church since the late first century, when, after the Temple fell, the remaining Jews did not accept the Messiah had come and went to work building a new religion, Rabbinic Judaism.
The only groups that I know of that think Jews are still the chosen people are dispensationalist, end-times fanatical Protestants, and Orthodox Jews. Not even Reformed Jews believe Jews are the chosen people!
I doubt it is only that.Cultural emphasis on knowledge and wisdom I would guess.
I guess it is naturally built on the Jews to be this way - brilliant in every field they choose to be in. As the scriptures says it, “they will be numerous as the stars in the heaven”.I doubt it is only that.
I am very surprised. I thought it would be Chinese or Japanese. Asians constitute one fourth of MIT entries.
I do not want to discuss aggressively this but with someone who coldly wants to dwell on it, it is an interesting fact.
Jews are the Chosen People of God. Jesus, Mary, Joseph are, I did not say were, are Jews. All the Apostles are. God did not forget them. God punished them more than any people in the History of Mankind, 2000 years of suffering ending with the Shoah.
I compare the Calvary of the Jewish People to the Cross of Jesus Christ.
They looked always into the future: “Next year in Jerusalem!” it was the promise Grandfathers taught grandchildren. And I am not dwelling into politics and Muslims do not enter here. It was always so even 500 years before Mohammed existed.
Moreover, they were not allowed into many trades in Catholic Countries, so they resorted to trade. And they read, read since the old times, when even in Europe, everybody was unanalphabet.
This trend to the future, this Messianic View coupled with the memorization of the Torah gave the Jews the tools to look into the future in Science and Culture.
There are more political vies that I have but, though I think they are true, they are explosive in today’s sensitive feelings and in the context of Israel existance. So, I am keeping them to myself.
Such OTT philosemitism smacks of supremacism and really invites one to seek contrary examples. The Jews have no more a monopoly on the improvement of mankind than Gentiles have a monopoly on its decline.They literally light up the night skies, and showed their radiance for the improvement of mankind.
I found it. Thank you.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM**839 **“Those who have not yet received the Gospel are related to the People of God in various ways.” The relationship of the Church with the Jewish People. When she delves into her own mystery, the Church, the People of God in the New Covenant, discovers her link with the Jewish People, “the first to hear the Word of God.” The Jewish faith, unlike other non-Christian religions, is already a response to God’s revelation in the Old Covenant. To the Jews “belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ”, “for the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable.”
Can anyone confirm this is true? Even Church Fathers such as St. Justin Martyr, St. Augustine and Origen taught that Israel is the Church.The Catholic church also condemns replacement theology or supersessionism.
Yes-- where is the historical context of CCC 839?Can anyone confirm this is true? Even Church Fathers such as St. Justin Martyr, St. Augustine and Origen taught that Israel is the Church.
So Israel exists outside of the Church? That is the teaching of the Catholic Church?Yes-- where is the historical context of CCC 839?
No. Supersessionism is a word used in Protestant theology, but it is certainly not condemned by the Catholic Church, and it forms one of the very basic tenets of Christianity. The Old Covenant is no longer salvific and it is only through New Covenant of Jesus Christ that one may be saved. It is stated clearly in Scripture: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”Can anyone confirm this is true? Even Church Fathers such as St. Justin Martyr, St. Augustine and Origen taught that Israel is the Church.
The Council of Florence
"It [the Catholic Church] firmly believes, professes, and teaches that the matter pertaining to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosaic law, which are divided into ceremonies, sacred rites, sacrifices, and sacraments, because they were established to signify something in the future, although they were suited to the divine worship at that time, after our Lord’s coming had been signified by them,** ceased**, and the sacraments of the New Testament began; and that whoever, even after the passion, placed hope in these matters of the law and submitted himself to them as necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ could not save without them, sinned mortally.
…
after the promulgation of the Gospel it asserts that they cannot be observed without the loss of eternal salvation.
Pope Pius XII
On the Cross then the Old Law died, soon to be buried and to be a bearer of death, [36] in order to give way to the New Testament of which Christ had chosen the Apostles as qualified ministers.
Pope Benedict XIV
The first consideration is that the ceremonies of the Mosaic Law were abrogated by the coming of Christ and that they can no longer be observed without sin after the promulgation of the Gospel.
Vatican II: Nostra Aetate
The Church, therefore, cannot forget that she received the revelation of the Old Testament through the people with whom God in His inexpressible mercy concluded the Ancient Covenant. Nor can she forget that she draws sustenance from the root of that well-cultivated olive tree onto which have been grafted the wild shoots, the Gentiles.(7) Indeed, the Church believes that by His cross Christ, Our Peace, reconciled Jews and Gentiles. making both one in Himself.
In an article I read:Yes. That is what the Catechism of the Catholic church says therefore it is Catholic doctrine.
Oh, that’s very good. I was getting afraid the CC had changed this doctrine but luckily this isn’t the case.No. Supersessionism is a word used in Protestant theology, but it is certainly not condemned by the Catholic Church, and it forms one of the very basic tenets of Christianity. The Old Covenant is no longer salvific and it is only through New Covenant of Jesus Christ that one may be saved. It is stated clearly in Scripture: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”
That’s my point. The position of Judaism is comparable to that of Islam. Yes, it is an Abrahamic faith, which is better than paganism, but it’s still incomplete and erroneous. Jews who reject the Messiah are more or less in the same position as Muslims.They are in a higher position than the other non-Christian religions because our religion is an off-shoot of theirs. But, beyond that??
Whatever form of Judaism is practised today, whether it’s similar to what was practised before the coming of the Messiah or not, it is not salvific. While the Old Covenant was never revoked, it was fulfilled and superseded by the New Covenant.But, kch86, after the destruction of the Temple, in 70 AD, the Jews switched from Temple Judaism to Rabbinical Judaism, therefore they ceased to practice much of the Old Covenant. .
I believe that Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate stated something to that effect, saying that it wasn’t all the Jews present at the time who were responsible for Jesus’ death, and so neither can the Jews of today be held responsible.More specifically, I need to know if the Catholic Church has ever unequivocally rejected any teaching that today’s Jews are responsible for the Crucifixion because of ancestral guilt.
I’ll read it. The analogy that Mormons hold is so be easily refuted that it is laughable.I believe that Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate stated something to that effect, saying that it wasn’t all the Jews present at the time who were responsible for Jesus’ death, and so neither can the Jews of today be held responsible.