Why are atheists so unhappy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RNRobert
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe to you, i only the other hand have no time for faith. For i care that my beliefs are true.
Then I’ll continue to pray for your soul, because you’re going to have* plenty* of “time” to wish you had given more of it to*** true faith*** in God, given the free choice to do so.
(Saint Padre Pio once told an unbeliever, that*** he will*** ‘believe’, once he gets “there”.)
I hope you take care, enough to secure a happy eternity. God be with you.
 
Then I’ll continue to pray for your soul, because you’re going to have* plenty* of “time” to wish you had given more of it to*** true faith*** in God, given the free choice to do so.
(Saint Padre Pio once told an unbeliever, that*** he will*** ‘believe’, once he gets “there”.)
I hope you take care, enough to secure a happy eternity. God be with you.
Please don’t pray for me. If your god would send me to hell for the simple fact there is no empirical evidence it exists, then it is not the kind of creature i would want to know anyway. I would rather burn in hell than worship such a twisted individual, and i will not be threaten into mental slavery .
 
**Remember there are two options available to us, either God exists or he doesn’t, my experiences tell me He does. I can’t prove it to you like I could something mathematical but I know in the most elemental part of me that He exists. I understand that it’s not a knowledge that I can share with others but it is a personal knowledge of which I can’t ignore. **

a personal knowledge, i.e a belief.

Most saints who are holy are able to perform miracles and these miracles can be verified by eye witness accounts. There is Lourdes for example wherein 66 miracles (under extreme and rigorous study put forth before a panel of international medical doctors of all ilks) or has they put unexplainable phenomena that attests to the presence of God.

Well when you could the number of cases there is no higher % than anywhere else.

**But I can substantiate it and so can others; there have been many supernatural experiences that cannot be explained by science. And these events are necessary to our understanding of life the divine or life after death. I think in my opinion you have a narrow scope of what constitutes knowledge. Some of the best thinkers were not necessarily scientists, that should give you some food for thought. **

Some thing being unexplained does not make it supernatural.

**The only way that you can say faith is contradictory to knowledge is if you somehow absolutely knew that God didn’t exist, but you don’t, you can’t know, therefore how can you say with assurety that I’m wrong in believing in God, in having faith and knowledge of him? **

I didn’t say you were defiantly wrong, you belief may well be correct, it just is not knowledge.

You said that you believed I was wrong, well, that belief is not knowledge as you have no real way of knowing God doesn’t exist.

Agreed, however i have never said i know there is no god.
 
**Remember there are two options available to us, either God exists or he doesn’t, my experiences tell me He does. I can’t prove it to you like I could something mathematical but I know in the most elemental part of me that He exists. I understand that it’s not a knowledge that I can share with others but it is a personal knowledge of which I can’t ignore. **

a personal knowledge, i.e a belief.

Most saints who are holy are able to perform miracles and these miracles can be verified by eye witness accounts. There is Lourdes for example wherein 66 miracles (under extreme and rigorous study put forth before a panel of international medical doctors of all ilks) or has they put unexplainable phenomena that attests to the presence of God.

Well when you could the number of cases there is no higher % than anywhere else.

**But I can substantiate it and so can others; there have been many supernatural experiences that cannot be explained by science. And these events are necessary to our understanding of life the divine or life after death. I think in my opinion you have a narrow scope of what constitutes knowledge. Some of the best thinkers were not necessarily scientists, that should give you some food for thought. **

Some thing being unexplained does not make it supernatural.

**The only way that you can say faith is contradictory to knowledge is if you somehow absolutely knew that God didn’t exist, but you don’t, you can’t know, therefore how can you say with assurety that I’m wrong in believing in God, in having faith and knowledge of him? **

I didn’t say you were defiantly wrong, you belief may well be correct, it just is not knowledge.

You said that you believed I was wrong, well, that belief is not knowledge as you have no real way of knowing God doesn’t exist.

Agreed, however i have never said i know there is no god.
We have eye witnesses, people who attest that Jesus Christ walked this earth, died and resurrected and made the audacious statement of truly being the Son of God. Why do you assume that this is wrong or that it never happened? Furthermore, by supernatural I mean people who have been visited by spirits, angels, things not of this world, or for example the 'dancing of the sun" at Fatima, or the Shroud of Turin (which by the way is the most studied artifact in history). . .etc. Have you bothered to look into the miracles of Lourdes, don’t you wish to understand phenomena such as this? Aren’t you the least bit curious?
 
Please don’t pray for me. If your god would send me to hell for the simple fact there is no empirical evidence it exists, then it is not the kind of creature i would want to know anyway. I would rather burn in hell than worship such a twisted individual, and i will not be threaten into mental slavery .
Where do you get your ideas of God from Charlie? Don’t you think you should at least read the New Testament in the Bible to understand where we’re coming from or who God truly is? God bless.
 
We have eye witnesses, people who attest that Jesus Christ walked this earth, died and resurrected and made the audacious statement of truly being the Son of God. Why do you assume that this is wrong or that it never happened? Furthermore, by supernatural I mean people who have been visited by spirits, angels, things not of this world, or for example the 'dancing of the sun" at Fatima, or the Shroud of Turin (which by the way is the most studied artifact in history). . .etc. Have you bothered to look into the miracles of Lourdes, don’t you wish to understand phenomena such as this? Aren’t you the least bit curious?
What people made those claims about Jesus, and how do we know?

At Fatima, a lot of people claimed to see a dancing sun, to be sure. Oddly enough, some of the witnesses there claimed to have NOT seen a dancing sun, which is a bit weird. If the sun really had danced in the sky, wouldn’t everybody have seen it?

What is the significance of the Shroud of Turin?
 
Please don’t pray for me. If your god would send me to hell for the simple fact there is no empirical evidence it exists, then it is not the kind of creature i would want to know anyway. I would rather burn in hell than worship such a twisted individual, and i will not be threaten into mental slavery .
Actually what you imagine as “slavery” is true freedom, and what you envisage as “freedom” is slavery. Non-belief results in the human person to be enslaved to several masters: temporal success and wealth, base instincts, animal passion, and societalnorms and mores. With belief, we are free from these constraints and we can rise above our meager existence in this life. You desire empirical evidence. So did St. Thomas the Apostle. Upon reports of our Lord’s resurrection, Thomas did not believe unless he saw Jesus had risen by empirical evidence. When he did finally see the Lord, Jesus told him that those who believed without seeing were the truly blessed. From your posts, you seem to think yourself intelligent and educated. Your education is complete at best because of your lack of study of philosophy. There are things that we can know without empirical evidence. I do wonder how you deal with abstract mathematical theories. Geometry of course is backed by empirical data, but what of number theory? How can you know that numbers go on to infinity in either direction of a number line without empirical evidence to back it up? Without defining infinity, you can only assume, but not know with certainty that numbers are indeed infinite. If you are going to reject God due to a lack of empirical data, then you must also reject mathematics.
 
What people made those claims about Jesus, and how do we know?
The Apostles and those who later became the disciples of the eye witnesses, i.e., the apostles. There are also historical reports by people unrelated to the Christian sect at the time, people like Pliny the Younger, Tacitus, Josephus and a whole bunch more that attest that Jesus was real and did die. Things like his resurrection were mentioned along with miracles and the like, however, they themselves did not believe this, but it’s striking nevertheless because Tacitus (a first century historian), for example, gives us a clue as to how early on the Christians were already proclaiming the Word of God.
At Fatima, a lot of people claimed to see a dancing sun, to be sure. Oddly enough, some of the witnesses there claimed to have NOT seen a dancing sun, which is a bit weird. If the sun really had danced in the sky, wouldn’t everybody have seen it?
Yes, that does seem rather odd but 70 000 still claim to have seen the sun dance atheist and believer alike, in fact, people miles away saw it as well. Moreover, what is astonishing to me is that the children who were speaking to Mother Mary were told the exact date and hour that this phenomena would happen and it did. This is nothing a mere human (children) could know.
What is the significance of the Shroud of Turin?
The Shroud of Turin is the burial cloth of Jesus and on it remains the image of man that till this day cannot be explained by science. They are not sure as to how the image got there. If you type in “shroud of Turin” you will find the official cite put together by a man named Barrie Shwartz (a Jew). There you will find a plethora of information on the shroud including scientific experiments done. God bless.
 
Where do you get your ideas of God from Charlie? Don’t you think you should at least read the New Testament in the Bible to understand where we’re coming from or who God truly is? God bless.
Not really, it very simple, either god (just for the sake of argument i will say it exists) is going to punish me or not punish me when i die.

If its not going to punish me then all is fine. If it is going to punish me just because i didn’t believe it exists, then it is not a creature worthy of my respect, let alone worship.
 
Actually what you imagine as “slavery” is true freedom, and what you envisage as “freedom” is slavery. Non-belief results in the human person to be enslaved to several masters: temporal success and wealth, base instincts, animal passion, and societalnorms and mores. With belief, we are free from these constraints and we can rise above our meager existence in this life. You desire empirical evidence. So did St. Thomas the Apostle. Upon reports of our Lord’s resurrection, Thomas did not believe unless he saw Jesus had risen by empirical evidence. When he did finally see the Lord, Jesus told him that those who believed without seeing were the truly blessed. From your posts, you seem to think yourself intelligent and educated. Your education is complete at best because of your lack of study of philosophy. There are things that we can know without empirical evidence. I do wonder how you deal with abstract mathematical theories. Geometry of course is backed by empirical data, but what of number theory? How can you know that numbers go on to infinity in either direction of a number line without empirical evidence to back it up? Without defining infinity, you can only assume, but not know with certainty that numbers are indeed infinite. If you are going to reject God due to a lack of empirical data, then you must also reject mathematics.
If i am going to reject god i must also reject maths? Are you for real? I can’t wait to here this, carry on… Or is that you explanation above? Oh and infinity is not a number, so no, numbers don’t go onto infinity. Infinity is a mathematical construct that deals with limits. E.G. limitless sets.

Also I’m not interested in philosophy, i find it to be meaningless with it comes to real knowledge. To quote thunderf00t “philosophy is typically the last resort of those that have been thoroughly routed out of the academic arena” 😃
 
If i am going to reject god i must also reject maths? Are you for real? I can’t wait to here this one, carry on…

Also I’m not interested in philosophy, i find it to be meaningless with it comes to real knowledge. To quote thunderf00t “philosophy is typically the last resort of those that have been thoroughly routed out of the academic arena” 😃
Or as my prof says: “Any question, if pushed far enough becomes a question of Metaphysics”
 
Easy give me any number an i will add one to it :D. Try if for you self ;).
Sorry, that is reason, not anything that can be measured by the senses. Try again. You must only use empirical evidence. This is why math is essentially a branch of philosophy. It is no coincidence that early mathemeticians were philosophers.
 
The Apostles and those who later became the disciples of the eye witnesses, i.e., the apostles. There are also historical reports by people unrelated to the Christian sect at the time, people like Pliny the Younger, Tacitus, Josephus and a whole bunch more that attest that Jesus was real and did die. Things like his resurrection were mentioned along with miracles and the like, however, they themselves did not believe this, but it’s striking nevertheless because Tacitus (a first century historian), for example, gives us a clue as to how early on the Christians were already proclaiming the Word of God.
Are the apostles trustworthy? That is, is it reasonable to accept their testimony on a matter of whether or not Jesus was divine?

I accept that there was a revolutionary Jewish teacher during that period who went by “Yeshua” or something similar, but what I question is whether he was actually divine.
Yes, that does seem rather odd but 70 000 still claim to have seen the sun dance atheist and believer alike, in fact, people miles away saw it as well. Moreover, what is astonishing to me is that the children who were speaking to Mother Mary were told the exact date and hour that this phenomena would happen and it did. This is nothing a mere human (children) could know.
Were all 70,000 people all interviewed, and did each and every one of them say that they witnessed the miracle?

I don’t think that there was an actual miracle. I think that what happened can be explained by human psychology.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments
The Shroud of Turin is the burial cloth of Jesus and on it remains the image of man that till this day cannot be explained by science. They are not sure as to how the image got there. If you type in “shroud of Turin” you will find the official cite put together by a man named Barrie Shwartz (a Jew). There you will find a plethora of information on the shroud including scientific experiments done. God bless.
It’s interesting, but I can’t find anything indicating that it was Jesus’s burial cloth.
 
From my experience a person who doesn’t know their faith can often be less happy within themselves than someone who knows their faith.

I think it’s all about security and believing the things you know as true.

Like someone said, it’s all about fooling yourself into being happy, but that doesn’t mean the happiness is any less valid.
 
Not really, it very simple, either god (just for the sake of argument i will say it exists) is going to punish me or not punish me when i die.

If its not going to punish me then all is fine. If it is going to punish me just because i didn’t believe it exists, then it is not a creature worthy of my respect, let alone worship.
With an attitude like yours why do you even bother conversing with us, you know nothing about God.
 
If you are going to reject God due to a lack of empirical data, then you must also reject mathematics.
I think the appropriate atheistic response would be that you would also have to reject the Flying Spaghetti Monster for lack of empirical data as well.

I don’t have certitude, I only have probability. Which is why I don’t call myself an atheist.
 
Are the apostles trustworthy? That is, is it reasonable to accept their testimony on a matter of whether or not Jesus was divine?

I accept that there was a revolutionary Jewish teacher during that period who went by “Yeshua” or something similar, but what I question is whether he was actually divine.

Were all 70,000 people all interviewed, and did each and every one of them say that they witnessed the miracle?

I don’t think that there was an actual miracle. I think that what happened can be explained by human psychology.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments

It’s interesting, but I can’t find anything indicating that it was Jesus’s burial cloth.
I’m starting to think that conversing with atheists is such a waste time, I’m sorry, but I can’t help it, ultimately I don’t care whether you believe or not, but if this is your idea of research and in depth analysis of such things like “the dancing sun” or the “shroud of Turin” or the miracles of Lourdes or any other thing connected to God then don’t bother asking questions. Now did you actually go on the website I suggested?

p.s. The shroud of Turin is believed to be the burial cloth of Jesus, you need to look up the information on the official website and you will find tons of reports, experiments and what not concerning the authenticity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top