**Remember there are two options available to us, either God exists or he doesn’t, my experiences tell me He does. I can’t prove it to you like I could something mathematical but I know in the most elemental part of me that He exists. I understand that it’s not a knowledge that I can share with others but it is a personal knowledge of which I can’t ignore. **
a personal knowledge, i.e a belief.
Most saints who are holy are able to perform miracles and these miracles can be verified by eye witness accounts. There is Lourdes for example wherein 66 miracles (under extreme and rigorous study put forth before a panel of international medical doctors of all ilks) or has they put unexplainable phenomena that attests to the presence of God.
Well when you could the number of cases there is no higher % than anywhere else.
**But I can substantiate it and so can others; there have been many supernatural experiences that cannot be explained by science. And these events are necessary to our understanding of life the divine or life after death. I think in my opinion you have a narrow scope of what constitutes knowledge. Some of the best thinkers were not necessarily scientists, that should give you some food for thought. **
Some thing being unexplained does not make it supernatural.
**The only way that you can say faith is contradictory to knowledge is if you somehow absolutely knew that God didn’t exist, but you don’t, you can’t know, therefore how can you say with assurety that I’m wrong in believing in God, in having faith and knowledge of him? **
I didn’t say you were defiantly wrong, you belief may well be correct, it just is not knowledge.
You said that you believed I was wrong, well, that belief is not knowledge as you have no real way of knowing God doesn’t exist.
Agreed, however i have never said i know there is no god.