Why did God create dinosaurs

  • Thread starter Thread starter newearth
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You must think I’m a real dingbat. How in the world can you misread a poster of an ape progressing IN PICTURES, all the way up to a modern man. Believe me my children and grandchildren’s education and future does not depend on them understanding this. God Bless, Memaw
No, you’re not a dingbat, but you are misreading the poster. Those are not ape ancestors. The hominid and non-hominid ape lines diverged from a common ancestor between 6.5 and 7.4 million years ago.

http://www.bio.davidson.edu/Courses/bio112/112cp/midterm03key_files/image004.jpg
 
In fairness, one needs to realize that many professors have offices in an ivory tower. Thus, they are unaware of life in the trenches. Thus, it is difficult for them to understand that the real message of those posters and of the bumper stickers is that like brute animals, humans do not have or do not need spiritual souls.
😦
Granny, I work with many professors, none of whom live in ivory towers. In fact, it is people who sit at home and never have contact with the exciting currents in the intellectual world – both scientific and theological – who live in an ivory tower. I encourage you to get out a bit, meet some intellectuals, and read some current theology, such as John Haught’s God After Darwin: A Theology of Evolution.
 
Please note that section 63 is an excellent example of how to distinguish between scientific opinions of high ranking Catholic clergy and actual, formal, official teachings of the Catholic Church.

For those not familiar with Catholic doctrines, the obvious clue is that section 63 deals with science. Catholic doctrines deal with faith and morals. Big difference.

The following quotation is from the end of
Communion and Stewardship: Human Persons Created in the Image of God
(the complete title of paper)

“As the text developed, it was discussed at numerous meetings of the subcommission and several plenary sessions of the International Theological Commission held at Rome during the period 2000-2002. The present text was approved in forma specifica, by the written ballots of the International Theological Commission. It was then submitted to Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, the President of the Commission, who has given his permission for its publication.”

Plese note:
In section 63, there is no connection to Catholic doctrine. Do note that this particular section was quoted out of context; therefore Catholic teachings may appear in other sections since one of them appears in the complete title of the paper.

Blessings,
granny

These two websites contain TV ads about Catholicism. The first is from one of the Dioceses which is using them. The second is general information.
I was trying to show that to believe in a God driven (rather than atheistic) gradual process is an accepted possibility by the Church. And that a Catholic in perfectly good standing can believe in that gradual process. 🙂
 
Dear StAnastais. You got it wrong again. That statement you quote came out of a meeting of the “Bureau of Consensus” not the Pope. It perhaps is composed of a bunch of Darwinian studs who never stop to check out the evidences against their consensus. Who are they then in relationship to the Vatican?
Philipp, I’m going to have to agree with Jozef Ratzinger, Pope Benedict, against you. But if you believe there is scientific merit to your arguments, and you want to make an impact, you really should take them to the academic world, rather than to these discussion threads. I’m a theologian, not a scientist; you need to make your case to working scientists.

StAnastasia
 
I was trying to show that to believe in a God driven (rather than atheistic) gradual process is an accepted possibility by the Church. And that a Catholic in perfectly good standing can believe in that gradual process. 🙂
Virtually every Catholic theologian, scientis, and layperson I know accepts this God-inspired process, Steve. I haven’t met any of the handful of Catholic anti-evolutionists that is out there.

StAnastasia
 
In fairness, one needs to realize that many professors have offices in an ivory tower.
Thus, they are unaware of life in the trenches. Thus, it is difficult for them to understand that the real message of those posters and of the bumper stickers is that like brute animals, humans do not have or do not need spiritual souls.

😦
Ah…but we do have souls. And I know many Catholics and Christians that believe the in the process of gradual development (I keep from using the E word. Is is still banned?).

That’s the difference between us…you…myself…StA and many others here. We believe we have souls regardless of how humanity came about. 🙂
 
I agree. All life came from a common ancestor. God created the ancestor when the world had developed a safe and nourishing environment for it to grow in. At the proper time, God created a man and a woman from whom all humans have descended.
I disagree. God created every ‘after it’s own kind’, and all at the same time.
 
Virtually every Catholic theologian, scientis, and layperson I know accepts this God-inspired process, Steve. I haven’t met any of the handful of Catholic anti-evolutionists that is out there.

StAnastasia
Not Catholic scientists…or priests (even quite aged) nor bishops. It’s very much within the infinite power of God. Just think of the incredible awesome power of standing outside of time and guiding what for us can seem to be an eternity into existence!

The infinite power is awesome! 🙂
 
It’s too bad. The homepage for Kolbe Center left this out:

"Since it has been demonstrated that all living organisms on earth are genetically related, it is virtually certain that all living organisms have descended from this first organism." ~ Communion and Stewardship (2002)
Why would they post the above on their web site? I don’t think they want to get a bad review by St. Peter when it is their time to pass on. Perhaps some day they might post the following as a compomise. It makes more sense as it is NOT a fairy tale; it seems to agree with the intent of Chirst, Lateran IV, the church fathers, scripture and the magisterium of the church teachings on our origin.🙂

“Since it has been demonstrated that all living organisms on Earth are genetically related, it is virtually certain that all living organisms have obviously been created AT ONCE by the One and the same Creator by variation in the DNA structure of each life form. [Simul in latin meaning “at once” in English, from Lateran IV, AD 1215]

Fr. Baker of Homiletic and Pastoral Review has an interesting review of the Book, EVOLUTION AND OTHER FAIRY TALES by Dr. Larry Azar of Iona College. Fr. Baker recommended reading this book in his review for its concise understanding of the evolutionary mantra, The Engine of Atheism. [July 2006 issue, page 72]. Frankly I wouldn’t be caught dead recommending what the “Bureau of Concensus” wrote as you do. Read the late Larry Azar’s book and I suspect you will learn why.:cool: And good luck!
 
I disagree. God created every ‘after it’s own kind’, and all at the same time.
And that is your choice! I will not belittle you for that. Please don’t consider my faith any less because I believe that God follows the laws he set forth.
 
You haven’t seen gravity, and yet I’ll bet you accept that theory. You haven’t seen quantum mechanics or relativity, and you you accept that theory. You haven’t seen plate tectonics, and yet you accept that theory. Why is evolution the only scientific theory you don’t accept?
There is proof of the theory of gravity and there is no other proof to contradict it. Also God says nothing about it.

On the other hand, there are tons of evidence that God created it not by a common ancestor and not by evolution as the ‘Theory of Evolution’ states it.

So there is no evidence to contradict the above theories, bu there is that contradict the Theory of Evolution.
 
Why would they post the above on their web site? I don’t think they want to get a bad review by St. Peter when it is their time to pass on. Perhaps some day they might post the following as a compomise. It makes more sense as it is NOT a fairy tale; it seems to agree with the intent of Chirst, Lateran IV, the church fathers, scripture and the magisterium of the church teachings on our origin.🙂

“Since it has been demonstrated that all living organisms on Earth are genetically related, it is virtually certain that all living organisms have obviously been created AT ONCE by the One and the same Creator by variation in the DNA structure of each life form. [Simul in latin meaning “at once” in English, from Lateran IV, AD 1215]

Fr. Baker of Homiletic and Pastoral Review has an interesting review of the Book, EVOLUTION AND OTHER FAIRY TALES by Dr. Larry Azar of Iona College. Fr. Baker recommended reading this book in his review for its concise understanding of the evolutionary mantra, The Engine of Atheism. [July 2006 issue, page 72]. Frankly I wouldn’t be caught dead recommending what the “Bureau of Concensus” wrote as you do. Read the late Larry Azar’s book and I suspect you will learn why.:cool: And good luck!
Now…if you want to go back and live in 1215 AD…you’re going to have to make some serious lifestyle changes. The sun revolved around the earth. Slavery and surfdom was cool. Medical care really stunk. There was no CAF. There was no electricity. Hmmm…live in 1215 AD. I don’t think you’ll like it. They didn’t even have deodorant. 🙂
 
There is proof of the theory of gravity and there is no other proof to contradict it. Also God says nothing about it.

On the other hand, there are tons of evidence that God created it not by a common ancestor and not by evolution as the ‘Theory of Evolution’ states it.

So there is no evidence to contradict the above theories, bu there is that contradict the Theory of Evolution.
Show me proof of gravity! I’ve read on a thread here where there is none. Of course that was by someone refuting E.
 
Show me proof of gravity!
Does a rock fall on the ground?
I’ve read on a thread here where there is none. Of course that was by someone refuting E.
There is none what?

By the way, I was just surfing the Internet and since were talking about dinosaurs I’ll post it here.

Looks like T-Rex was a vegetarian:

**T-Rex was a Veggy!?**http://www.remnantofgod.org/images/t-rex.gif Were you aware that it has been proven by the Creation Evidence Museum that T-Rex was NOT a meat eater? That’s right! They proved it in TWO WAYS…


  1. *]The roots of T-Rex were only 2 inches deep. Had he bit into the hide of another dinosaur he would have lost teeth
    *]They cut a tooth in half og a unearthed T-Rex and found in deeply impureated with CHLOROPHYLL! That’s right, Chlorophyll is the main substance found in PLANTS not meat!
    Code:
             By the way, this discovery              validates the Bible once again! How so? See this passage...
    Genesis 1:30, “And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.”
    Now… before proclaiming you MUST eat meat because the proteins in meat will help you to gain weight, look around on planet earth for a moment. Look at all the HUGE animals like cows… horses… hippos… elephants… rhinos… etc. What do THEY eat? That’s right. PLANTS!

    Source

    What do you think?

 
Now…if you want to go back and live in 1215 AD…you’re going to have to make some serious lifestyle changes. The sun revolved around the earth. Slavery and surfdom was cool. Medical care really stunk. There was no CAF. There was no electricity. Hmmm…live in 1215 AD. I don’t think you’ll like it. They didn’t even have deodorant. 🙂
Try medieval dental care or obstetrics!
 
Does a rock fall on the ground?]
How is that a proof of the theory of gravity? God could have pushed the rock down. The rock could have sought its Aristotelian “natural place.” Your “proof” is no help.
 
I disagree. God created every ‘after it’s own kind’, and all at the same time.
You are absolutely correct. That’s how modern lab and field research scientists read it too. Those millions and billions of years needed for origins of life from a common ancestor just don’t exist.

C-14 dating of dinosaur bones to diamonds in the thousands of years confirms that the 65 to 225 millions of years for dinosaur habitation and diamonds (99% carbon) being up to 3 billion years old is a fairy tale.

One day future generations will look back at this time period and ask, How on earth did the people of that period believe in the fairy tale that said we have descended from a common ancestor?😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top