M
M.I.Knight
Guest
How can he still be good if he created Lucifer Sean?
As has been said before, God created Lucifer, through Lucifer’s sin of rebellion he became satan.Dear sean,
I think the question your asking is : CAn God create Satan and still be good if he knows that Lucifer will go to hell
a) God created lucifer with free will, therefore he ramained free, and had a free choice. He chose to reign in Hell rather than to serve in heaven. It was a great act of love on God’s part, Because Satan could have chose to serve, and to have kept his life. Because God wouldn’t force Lucifer to choose him. It was of his own doing (satan) that was a result of his eternal damnation.How can he still be good if he created Lucifer Sean?
I believe everything you say, but some might say that God knew that Lucifer would have gone to hell if he created him and it would have been better that God would not have created him at all (Matthew 26:24) How do we defend are faith from this accusation? Honest, misled people are accusing God.As has been said before, God created Lucifer, through Lucifer’s sin of rebellion he became satan.
God is always good, we cannot bleme him for creating Hitler, Stalin, Michael Jackson and all horrendous sinners, as he created them in love it is by our sin that we embrace satans ways
Okay, so after reading the plethora of other opinions and getting terribly confused with everything I figured I would take my uneducated stab in the dark. For simplicities sake we will say Judas is Satan. (“Then Satan entered into Judas called Iscariot, who was a number of the twelve;” [Luke 22:3])why did God create satan knowing he would go to hell? if God wanted the best thingfor satan, it would have been better that he had not been created?just like it wouild have been better that judas had not been born after betraying God
This IS the crux of the question. I heard Fr. Trigilio on Web of Faith (I think) address this question once. I believe his answer was along the lines that it is better to have been created that to have never existed.
I’ve thought about it and I figure it is better because creation is an act of love–it is a gift–and either we can cherish that gift, or we can destroy it. But ultimately, it is a gift and there are no “strings” attached. God loves all His creations, and if He decided not to create us based on the choice we would make–it would not truly be a gift. When you give something away–you give up the control of that thing. God gave us the gift of existence and that in itself is good and an act of love–therefore better than no gift at all–regardless of what WE choose to do with it.
I think maybe you might have found something. Existence is a gift from God. This gift is also an act of Love. He gave us life and he gave us his love. Kind of like a gift wrapped inside another gift. However, I still have few questions I haven’t figured out. Is it better to recieve God’s love or not to recieve it? Obviously, I think it is better to recieve God’s love, but is it better to recieve God’s love and then lose it or not to have recieve it at all? Would God be loving us more by not letting us experience his love? God’s love is like a burning fire. It could either embrace us, purify us, or burn us. I don’t know the answer, and these questions are frustrating me. God help me find an answer.This IS the crux of the question. I heard Fr. Trigilio on Web of Faith (I think) address this question once. I believe his answer was along the lines that it is better to have been created that to have never existed.
I’ve thought about it and I figure it is better because creation is an act of love–it is a gift–and either we can cherish that gift, or we can destroy it. But ultimately, it is a gift and there are no “strings” attached. God loves all His creations, and if He decided not to create us based on the choice we would make–it would not truly be a gift. When you give something away–you give up the control of that thing. God gave us the gift of existence and that in itself is good and an act of love–therefore better than no gift at all–regardless of what WE choose to do with it.
The trinity is a mystery. Does that mean that it is not worth studying, reflecting, and questioning this mystery. The early church fathers did this with the Trinity. Look at all the treasure they uncovered. The answer to their (The early Church Fathers) questions was self-evident (God is 3 distinct persons in one God(being), but not to Arius( and a huge population at that time). So, the fathers refected, studied, and questioned Arius’ non-trinitarian belief. They, also, did this with the Trinity. Eventually, they refuted Arius. The same is true for the mystery of Creation in our time. We have to mimic the Christians before us and defend our faith(Against atheists). Sometimes that includes self-critique of our own beliefs in order to strengthen it and refute the atheist.sean
*why did God create satan knowing he would go to hell? if God wanted the best thingfor satan, it would have been better that he had not been created?just like it wouild have been better that judas had not been born after betraying God *
And it would have been better for Adam and Eve if they had not been created? And it would have been better if Jesus had not been born to endure the horrible suffering he did?
These questions go nowhere because the answer is self evident. God creates from his own free will and his own plan, and is not accountable to us for why he created anything or anyone.
Let’s just call it the Mystery of Creation.
Catilieth said:“O happy fault, O necessary sin, that gained for us so great a redeemer!”
So, basically you are saying: If Adam and Eve chose not to sin, we would not need a redeemer. We would not experience God’s love on the cross, if Satan did not tempt us.So, that is why God created Satan; in order to tempt us. Am I right? Or did I misrepresent you?From the Easter Vigil…had not Adam and Eve sinned, God would not have “needed” to become man and shown us the great depth of his love for us. Christ would not have become our brother, our Redeemer.
What unfathomable goodness God wrought from Adam’s sin. That we should not just be his creatures (which is what angels are, what Adam and Eve were), but that we have become his CHILDREN.
To show us in a physical concrete way the depth of his love, to become one of us…perhaps that is why God created Satan.
Mark 14: 21why did God create satan knowing he would go to hell? if God wanted the best thingfor satan, it would have been better that he had not been created?just like it wouild have been better that judas had not been born after betraying God
Yes, and many theologians throughout the ages have expounded on that very idea, and it is part of the Liturgy of the Easter Vigil Mass.So, basically you are saying: If Adam and Eve chose not to sin, we would not need a redeemer. We would not experience God’s love on the cross,
Is this anything but opinion?Frank Sheed’s “Thelogy for Beginners” does a good job of helping explain this.
If my memory serves correctly, it has everything to do with us being “in time” and angels being outside of it. In order for a human being to fully possess him/herself, a lifetime must be lived out. Since angels are living outside of time, they “possess” their full self from the moment of existence. Thus, when an angel says “no” to God, it is with full consent of their full self. When man does so, we still have time to correct our mistake before reaching the end our life (at which time we will possess ourselves fully, and thus be judged).
As a side note, I think this theory plays well in refuting “once saved, always saved.” The fundamentalist says “I gave my life to God once, and now it’s a done deal.” The Catholic says, “I said yes to God w/everything I have so far, but it is not yet my whole self. Now I will say yes to God for the rest of my days, so that when I am fully myself, I can be judged w/fairness and mercy.”
Dianne
(Did I steer too far off track? lol)