Muhammad were not taught by any one. If that was in that way Pagans would refute Muhammad very easily. Muhammad could not read or write. He was taught directly by God.
You are anti-Christ because you claim such thing about Jesus himself never preached.
You contend that Mohammad was never taught by anyone, and received his knowledge directly from God. That is highly unlikely, given that he parrots common heretical beliefs of his time, such as the non-divinity of Christ, the lack of Crucifixion, and multiple others. His views are so much in line with those heretical groups, and we know those groups to have been active in the Arabian peninsula, so it seems highly unlikely that he wasn’t influenced by them.
Beyond this, he says things that are directly contradicted by both Jewish and Roman historians, apart from the Christian history told in the Bible. There is absolutely no question as to the crucifixion. In order for Mohammad to be correct, everyone involved in the crucifixion would have to be a moron. The Romans were adept at killing people, and it is basically impossible that they would have taken Christ down from the cross without making sure he was dead. (That’s what the stabbing in the side is for. One, to check, and two, to create a wound you cannot recover from, which would have likely pierced both the intestinal tracks, and lungs, leading to either sepsis or suffocation.)
The body double concept is likewise nonsense, because Christ appeared later bearing all of the wounds which, once again, would have been 100% fatal to any human being.
Now, I know many Muslims simply deny this accounts as fabrications, but there is literally no reason to do so other than the word of your so-called prophet.
Given a choice between the men who directly followed Christ and went to their painful deaths singing His praises and forgiving their murderers, or a warlord who spread his faith through violence and conquest a few centuries after the fact, there is no question about who I’m going to believe.
You are anti-Christ because you claim such thing about Jesus himself never preached.
Except He did say them, quite clearly, as recorded in the Gospels. Literately the only basis you have for rejecting those accounts is because Mohammad said they were false. Given that it was in his best interest (worldly interest at least, I doubt it did much for his eternal prospects) to deny Jesus’ divinity, it makes sense that he’d do so through lies and denial. He has no evidence for his assertion other than the nebulous claim that God spoke to him, and given the vast, VAST, number of false prophets throughout history who have claimed the same, there is absolutely no reason to accept him beyond blind faith.
Also, not being able to read and write doesn’t mean a person can’t be taught. That’s just… that’s just a dumb argument, I’m sorry.
