Mary has
nothing to do with our salvation? :ehh:
- All Christians believe in the Incarnation of Jesus Christ, the Word made flesh, Emmanuel.
- God chose Mary to be the earthly mother of Jesus Christ, and she was honored by both angels and men (Gabriel, Elizabeth, St. John) because of her fidelity to her vocation.
- It was Mary’s fiat, her free will, in cooperating with God’s will, that allowed the Holy Spirit to come upon her so that she conceived Christ in her womb.
- The question of whether Christ would have been born anyway had Mary not cooperated with God is a moot point, she did agree and it was due to her agreement with God’s will that Christ did become man.
- Therefore, all Christians should acknowledge that Mary does play a huge role in our eternal salvation, and should, in fact, follow the example of the angels and her kinsfolks by honoring her (not worship her!) and her fidelity and love of our Lord.
The Protestant zeal for removing all recognition of Mary is what does
not seem to logically follow from Scripture and Tradition (yes, Tradition… not man-made tradition, but apostalic Tradition, which was both written and oral, and acknowledged as authoritative throughout the early Church)
As for man-made traditions… I will not deny that there are man-made traditions in the Church, along with Traditions (with a capital-T) that come to us from Christ, down through the apostles and their successors. Sometimes man-made tradition can be taken too far. Most times, the Protestant railing against tradition falls flat when it is compared to the actual Church teaching on the tradition in question.
I have to ask you, as a Protestant, can you explain to me why Protestants maintain such man-made “traditions” as altar calls? Where are altar calls in the Bible? For that matter, where in the Bible does the man-made tradition of
sola Scriptura come from? Or the man-made tradition of saying that the Eucharist is only a symbol of Christ?
That idea of mere symbolism didn’t even exist until the time of the Reformation, the Real Presence was without question in writings of the Church Fathers. Why did it take 1500 years for the “truth” about the Eucharist to be made known? And how is this belief in “symbol-only” not man-made, or even not-Biblical?
As for the rest of your tirade, I am not a Church historian, and this is long enough already, so I leave it to another forum member more knowledgable than I about such things to tackle
God bless you and your faith journey, may our Lord grant you the grace to persever and “finish the race” before you so that you may enjoy peace with Him forever!
+veritas+