Why do most people ignore the Church's teaching on contraception?

  • Thread starter Thread starter loumeland
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
👍

My mother suffered infertility! She was told not to have me (she won’t confirm but I believe abortion was suggested to her for me!). I love my small family that I grew up in.

And yes, how did we get here??
Same way every thread gets here.
Pride
Guilt
Judgement
Self righteousness
Shame
Justification

Every poster is guilty of one of those. I know which one mine is.
 
No, my response wouldn’t be different. You are speaking from you perspective in defense of Marks right to call others to account because he has done life better.

The difference is that I’m not suggesting that he shouldn’t do life as he as done. He is suggesting that we examine our consciences for selfishness because we only have a small number of children. Yes, I would agree with you if I had been the accuser in this scenario. I am the defender though.
I did not read him saying to examine yourself for selfishness in your family size, but a general examine of selfishness in all areas. Where did he say he has “done life better?” Are we reading the same posts?
 
I am the oldest and I am married to an oldest, yet we share your perspective. I think the birth order thing is merely a coincidence. 🙂
😃 Too funny!

Yeah, birth order is a bit overplayed. But there are times I can see the influence of being an oldest child/youngest child on a person and try to keep that in mind when parenting.
 
And yes, how did we get here??
Earlier today I looked back through the thread to see where the tide changed from arguments against contraception to arguments against all family planning. I believe it was #533 .
Contraceptives are not holy or unholy themselves- they are a tool. It could be used with a contraceptive mindset, which would be wrong. But one could argue that it can be used for the holy purpose of intelligent and responsible family planning and parenting. Receiving that child with open arms when both parents are emotionally, financially, psychologically, and physically ready to do their very best to raise him/her in the fear and admonition of the Lord. This would be holy.
There’s always a point where someone introduces the lie that NFP can be done with a ‘contraceptive’ mentality. That tends to align the pro contraceptives and the anti NFPers as a quasi united front against people that do NFP. From there it turns into ‘the default is not to plan your family’ and the ideological standard that bigger families means more Catholic.
 
I did not read him saying to examine yourself for selfishness in your family size, but a general examine of selfishness in all areas. Where did he say he has “done life better?” Are we reading the same posts?
Post #632 forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=13578761&postcount=632

No, he was addressing Xantippes post where she cites eugenic reasons as one of the aspects influencing the decision to finish increasing the family. She refers to the worry that prospect raises for her and her husband and feels comfortable with that reason. Mark challenges her reason and suggests they ignore reasons they feel comfortable with and keep having more children anyway as a virtuous decision.

The fact is that not even the Church claims this as a higher path. The decision about family size is of such a nature that it should be left completely to the delicate indications that can only be present to the couple themselves as natural creatures in tune with both God and nature.
 
What’s completely missing from your perspective is that people aren’t all the same with the same personality, gifts, talents, upbringing, trials. For example, a young mother with anxiety disorder and agoraphobia, trying to raise children… getting them to the doctor, doing the grocery shopping, getting them to playgroup and all the other necessary activities involved in raising kids. Do you still say that its just about her attitude or interpretation of work? I’m not speaking ideologically when I answer to comments like yours. I’m speaking from experience of my own life and from the years that I worked in an environment of family counselling and really seeing what people struggle with in their day to day lives.

I would probably have felt as righteous as you do had I not been exposed to the realities of people broken and at their low ebbs. What it did for me was to feel blessed for having the good things in my life that I have and obliged to be understanding and compassionate towards those who have less.
I don’t still say because I never said. You seem to think I’m saying raising kids isn’t hard, or challenging or a struggle–that’s not what I have said. You seem to think I am dismissing them as trivial or the product of ones attitude–I have not done that. How we accept and view these challenges and struggles in life affects how we cope with them–it doesn’t change the reality of them but it can affect how we deal them. We don’t all deal with them in the same way. You seem to be greatly offended by the way I view them. I never said you had to view them the same way–though I get the feeling you think I should view them the way you do–that my way of viewing them somehow dismisses them–that I don’t understand. Of course as you say we are all different–but perhaps in my case that is not to be allowed. I tend to see work in a drudgery sort of way–I just don’t view raising my kids that way–even when it is hard or a challenge–that’s why I can say I don’t see it as work. If your view of work is as something affirming and fulfilling then I can see how your seeing raising kids as work would be a positive thing. That’s why I said perhaps our definitions of work may be different. I am just not sure why that makes me self-righteous, and lacking in compassion and understanding.

The peace of Christ,
Mark
 
I don’t still say because I never said. You seem to think I’m saying raising kids isn’t hard, or challenging or a struggle–that’s not what I have said. You seem to think I am dismissing them as trivial or the product of ones attitude–I have not done that. How we accept and view these challenges and struggles in life affects how we cope with them–it doesn’t change the reality of them but it can affect how we deal them. We don’t all deal with them in the same way. **You seem to be greatly offended by the way I view them. ** I never said you had to view them the same way–though I get the feeling you think I should view them the way you do–that my way of viewing them somehow dismisses them–that I don’t understand. Of course as you say we are all different–but perhaps in my case that is not to be allowed. I tend to see work in a drudgery sort of way–I just don’t view raising my kids that way–even when it is hard or a challenge–that’s why I can say I don’t see it as work. If your view of work is as something affirming and fulfilling then I can see how your seeing raising kids as work would be a positive thing. That’s why I said perhaps our definitions of work may be different. I am just not sure why that makes me self-righteous, and lacking in compassion and understanding.

The peace of Christ,
Mark
I’m not offended by the way you view them. I just think that you haven’t got a right to call out others on their choices that don’t align with yours. Have you forgotten that you did that in #632.
 
Post #632 forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=13578761&postcount=632

No, he was addressing Xantippes post where she cites eugenic reasons as one of the aspects influencing the decision to finish increasing the family. She refers to the worry that prospect raises for her and her husband and feels comfortable with that reason. Mark challenges her reason and suggests they ignore reasons they feel comfortable with and keep having more children anyway as a virtuous decision.

The fact is that not even the Church claims this as a higher path. The decision about family size is of such a nature that it should be left completely to the delicate indications that can only be present to the couple themselves as natural creatures in tune with both God and nature.
Right.

And those are not the only issues in play. Here’s a quick list:

–I’m 40
–I have three living children
–women my age have a 1 in 66 chance of a baby with a chromosomal abnormality
–I have an older autistic child (roughly a 1 in 7 chance of recurrence)
–my mother had breast cancer and a radical mastectomy at 41
–I’m overweight–my doctors all want me to lose weight
–I have foot trouble–my podiatrist has told me to lose weight and not tote the baby around
–I had a late miscarriage with my third pregnancy and had a lot of trouble recovering from it, both physically and psychologically
–With my last pregnancy, I had a subchorionic hematoma during the second trimester (lots of bleeding–we thought we’d lost the baby), followed by gestational diabetes in the third
–women my age and older can expect miscarriages to become very common as they get closer to the end of fertility
–my GP told me after I had my youngest that my history gave me a 50% chance of going Type 2 diabetic within 10 years.

Medically, I’m pretty much a disaster waiting to happen.
 
… I am just not sure why that makes me self-righteous, and lacking in compassion and understanding.,
For whatever it’s worth, I don’t either. 🤷

I don’t understand why good Catholics who follow the Church teachings and determined with their spouse in prayer that they have just reasons for limiting their family size and therefore use NFP should presume that you or anyone else with larger families are self-righteous and judgmental. I just don’t get it.

I do understand that NFP is sometimes hard. Perhaps those faithful Catholics who have used NFP to limit their family size don’t feel the same kind of “warm-fuzzies” from their obedience to Church teachings that some of us get. We don’t need to know their reasons for avoiding more children. If they didn’t use contraception and they faithfully discerned they had good reasons for using NFP or even total abstinence, then God bless them!

Continued discussions on how difficult parenting is seems a bit pointless, except that it does answer in a round-about way the question why people often ignore the Church teachings against contraception.
 
No, my response wouldn’t be different. You are speaking from you perspective in defense of Marks right to call others to account because he has done life better.

The difference is that I’m not suggesting that he shouldn’t do life as he as done. He is suggesting that we examine our consciences for selfishness because we only have a small number of children. Yes, I would agree with you if I had been the accuser in this scenario. I am the defender though.
For Pete’s sake. I’m not calling anyone to account. I seized on one particular phrase in a post by Xantippe–to ask a more general question that applied to more than the topic at hand. “Are we called to live in our comfort zone?” Boy was that a mistake. Why you keep insisting that I think I have done so well in life is beyond me. I ask these questions because I’d like to see feed back–on the actual question–so that I can do better in life. I thought the goal here was to learn how to become saints. To be quite truthful I’m pretty sure Xantippe lives outside her comfort zone. One can be comfortable with the decisions they make i.e. Xantippe and her family planning decisions but that’s different than living in your comfort zone. As I said in an earlier post–one can be comfortable in their decisions while still being outside their comfort zone. (example when we were first married we used abc, when we started Bible study and learning about the faith we adopted Church teaching as being true–perfectly comfortable with the decision, but what that decision entailed was a little outside our comfort zone at the time–we stepped outside our comfort zone on faith) I’m suggesting that we all examine our consciences regardless of the number of children we have regarding all areas of our life. Since I don’t have a large number of children I’d be accusing myself as well as anyone else if I was doing as you say.

I’d prefer you attack me for what I actually mean rather that what you think I mean–and if you’re not sure to ask for clarification–though I’m getting the feeling it doesn’t really matter what I mean. I don’t have a problem if you disagree with what I actually mean but I have a problem being told what I mean and what I am doing and being attacked for that – when it’s not actually what I am meaning or doing.

The peace of Christ,
Mark
 
I rarely even encounter it on these boards! More commonly I encounter on these boards people who think that those with large families feel superior to them. And then I encounter people who get defensive because they took offense at something. And then it goes downhill from there.

My own mother was a faithful Catholic who had two children and worked full time and sent us to Catholic schools. And I never encountered anyone at Catholic school who looked down on our family size. And I don’t look down on Catholics with small families --or Catholics with many children or no children for that matter.

This thread! :hmmm: How did the conversation devolve into this?
Communicating over the internet has it’s limitations.
You nailed it. Good question–I think it’s because we’re all human and often fall short of our Christian calling. Thanks for calling us on it.

The peace of Christ,
Mark
 
I think Most of the Churches teaching on contraception are logical, however, the teaching regarding condoms make’s no sense. I think condoms should be included in the rhythm method teaching.
 
For whatever it’s worth, I don’t either. 🤷

I don’t understand why good Catholics who follow the Church teachings and determined with their spouse in prayer that they have just reasons for limiting their family size and therefore use NFP should presume that you or anyone else with larger families are self-righteous and judgmental. I just don’t get it.
I tried to shed some light on this in post # 694.
 
I don’t understand why good Catholics who follow the Church teachings and determined with their spouse in prayer that they have just reasons for limiting their family size and therefore use NFP should presume that you or anyone else with larger families are self-righteous and judgmental. I just don’t get it.
My first brush with the offensive attitude was that without just reasons, NFP is done with a ‘contraceptive mentality’. Added to that one ‘if an African women in a mud hut in Africa can support a lot of children, what excuse to white westerners have for not having a lot of children also’. I’m perfectly at peace with my decisions and didn’t even question them until coming up against those ‘calling outs’ on this site. Some Catholics really believe that the intrinsic evil of contraception is the planning of the family not the thwarting of the nuptial meaning of sex. Contraception threads always turn against those who have planned their family with periodic abstinence.
I do understand that NFP is sometimes hard. Perhaps those faithful Catholics who have used NFP to limit their family size don’t feel the same kind of “warm-fuzzies” from their obedience to Church teachings that some of us get. We don’t need to know their reasons for avoiding more children. If they didn’t use contraception and they faithfully discerned they had good reasons for using NFP or even total abstinence, then God bless them!
We don’t have a lot of the 50/60 year old Catholics here who took the ‘leave it to providence how many children I have’ variety. People who promote that with ‘warm-fuzziness’ are younger and in the midst of child bearing not having to do periodic abstinence. When many of these people get to the 45 and 50’s, they change their tune about ‘leaving it to providence’ and deem themselves ‘done’ to heck with providence, and slip quietly off the soapbox lest they are called out as hypocrits.
 
I think Most of the Churches teaching on contraception are logical, however, the teaching regarding condoms make’s no sense. I think condoms should be included in the rhythm method teaching.
Why do you think this?
Question if I wear a condom is my wife being intimate with me in a giving way. Or is she being satisfied by latex and I am using her as well?
 
But doesn’t it occur to you that putting your kids full time in day care and after school care relieves a huge amount of child rearing stress? I have been a stay at home Mum since I was pregnant with my first and we’ve lived that time on one wage. We re-drew on our house loan to pay for Catholic education and that means 3 years after the last has left school, we are still technically paying off school fees. I felt it important that I raise my children myself and that was a good instinct because two of them were later diagnosed autistic spectrum. Those two now 21 and 25 are really thriving in life and contributing citizens.

I would never judge you for putting yours in daycare. That to me is none of my business. But don’t you understand that when you say that you found the childrearing work wasn’t really work in your sense… that your experience of being away from the children in an adult world of paying work for the majority of their lives, gives you a markedly different perspective to someone doing stay at home duties 24/7?
Yes it does. Does it not occur to you that it is also the source of a lot of other stress and guilt? The guilt my wife felt putting them in daycare was the source of a lot of pain and issues–as you said you felt it was important to raise your children yourself–imagine the guilt of a mother who doesn’t but thinks she should. You don’t have to judge us regarding the daycare (but you’re free to)–we judge ourselves. It was hard to jetison the income we did in order for my wife to stay home but lets just say it was thrust upon us–I’m going to choose to believe by God. We’ve done it both ways now–they both have there stresses–they’re just different. Here’s what I find funny–you’re willing to discount our experience and hold up yours–something you seem to like to accuse me of doing. Because I don’t do it 24/7 I’m just dismissed as if my part in raising the children is important or as if I couldn’t know anything about it, and you’re missing what I am saying. I’m not saying it isn’t really work in the sense that I think you are using the word. For me and for my wife–there is a difference between going to work at a job to make a living and staying home to raise your kids. They both require effort and struggles but raising your kids is so much more fulfilling and meaningful and ultimately more important–that, I’m sorry, I just can’t see it in the same way I see getting up and going to the office in the morning. I’d so much rather stay at home and raise the kids–that’s a worthy vocation. My work just keeps a roof over our heads and food on the table–our kids are the future and they belong ultimately to God. So you’re right it does give me a different perspective one that says it would be a joy to endure those struggles of raising my children in a way I don’t right now. The struggles at the office are not a joy–they are a burden. That’s the difference I see and that’s why we don’t call it work. I doubt that will make any sense to you. but that’s how we see it.

The peace of Christ,
Mark
 
I tried to shed some light on this in post # 694.
Thanks for trying, but that didn’t clarify it for me. It’s a long thread, but I didn’t see any post that took that extremist position of trying to define what constitutes good enough reasons for avoiding pregnancy when the Church herself has not.

As to your comments about the fear of being lumped in with large Catholic family stereo-types? Maybe since I grew up in a small family, I never experienced that stereo-typing in my youth so I don’t fear it so much as I age.

I’m still confused about the defensiveness, but thanks for trying.
 
I did not read him saying to examine yourself for selfishness in your family size, but a general examine of selfishness in all areas. Where did he say he has “done life better?” Are we reading the same posts?
Thanks. I was beginning to think I was crazy. It’s nice to see at least one other person was able to read it as it was intended. Yeah this whole thing about how I’ve done better in life is baffling–I would have thought it was clear that my life is far from that and my interest is in what kind of life we are called to live and how do we get there–I thought that what we’re all interested in. That’s what I need help with.

The peace of Christ,
Mark
 
I think Most of the Churches teaching on contraception are logical, however, the teaching regarding condoms make’s no sense. I think condoms should be included in the rhythm method teaching.
I think I see what you’re saying, but think about the use of condoms and how unnatural it is to take a manufactured piece of material and place it between yourself and your spouse. It perverts the natural end of the procreative act. Think “Oh honey I love you so completely, let me just wrap myself up in plastic wrap so I don’t actually come in contact with you, that would be gross.”
 
Yes it does. Does it not occur to you that it is also the source of a lot of other stress and guilt? The guilt my wife felt putting them in daycare was the source of a lot of pain and issues–as you said you felt it was important to raise your children yourself–imagine the guilt of a mother who doesn’t but thinks she should. You don’t have to judge us regarding the daycare (but you’re free to)–we judge ourselves. It was hard to jetison the income we did in order for my wife to stay home but lets just say it was thrust upon us–I’m going to choose to believe by God. We’ve done it both ways now–they both have there stresses–they’re just different. Here’s what I find funny–you’re willing to discount our experience and hold up yours–something you seem to like to accuse me of doing. Because I don’t do it 24/7 I’m just dismissed as if my part in raising the children is important or as if I couldn’t know anything about it, and you’re missing what I am saying. I’m not saying it isn’t really work in the sense that I think you are using the word. For me and for my wife–there is a difference between going to work at a job to make a living and staying home to raise your kids. They both require effort and struggles but raising your kids is so much more fulfilling and meaningful and ultimately more important–that, I’m sorry, I just can’t see it in the same way I see getting up and going to the office in the morning. I’d so much rather stay at home and raise the kids–that’s a worthy vocation. My work just keeps a roof over our heads and food on the table–our kids are the future and they belong ultimately to God. So you’re right it does give me a different perspective one that says it would be a joy to endure those struggles of raising my children in a way I don’t right now. The struggles at the office are not a joy–they are a burden. That’s the difference I see and that’s why we don’t call it work. I doubt that will make any sense to you. but that’s how we see it.

The peace of Christ,
Mark
Well, there are definite qualitative (and not just quantitative) differences in being alone with little kids all day versus sharing parenting with a spouse for a few hours between pick up and bedtime. Somebody (UbiCaritas?) was mentioning that as figuring into the difference between a SAHM’s experience of the evening, versus work-outside-the-home dad’s experience of the evening. Mom is often just barely going through the motions after a long day at home with the kid(s) and would kind of like to get in the car and go off by herself for the rest of the evening, whereas the kids are a novelty for dad (and vice versa), and he’s often able to deal much better with stuff that infuriates mom after dealing with it all day long. (Speaking with a broad brush, of course–I fully expect to hear from several parents that everything that their children do delights them each and every minute of the day.)

I have our youngest in parents’ day out two days a week, and I do find that my sense of humor is much better in afternoons after PDO than it is on the days when it’s all me all day. Likewise with school-aged kids–it’s easier for me to be sweet, even-tempered, gracious and effectively wily when I really only have to do it from 3:30 PM to 10 PM (most of which time, daddy is home). Within certain parameters, I’m a better parent the less parenting I have to do.

So, I’m not surprised by your parenting experiences, but they actually confirm rather than contradicting other people’s reports about struggling when they are putting in long hours of parenting alone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top