V
veritas4Christ
Guest
Originally Posted by veritas4Christ
Rev, you missing the point. It’s your mind that is the problem.
My reference to 1 Corinthians 7:36-38 was to show you that celibate relationships, ie where both the man and woman have decided to remain virgins, within the early Christian community were accepted - despite the fact that your mind cannot grasp this. Now, let’s take this one step further - possibly celibate marriages were practised based on the example of Mary and Joseph.
You have just given us an example of the flaw in protestant thinking. You have read far too much into what I have said. You have assumed that your interpretation is superior to mine. You are using your own life experience as the guide to interpreting Scripture. And it is YOU who has taken the quote out of it’s context. Quite simply, you, being a perpetually protesting and reforming yourself adherent, cannot do this. I’ll just start a new Church.Surely I am missunderstanding you! If you are claiming that these verses can be used to argue that people can or should remain celabit in marriage, then this is the worse abuse of a pasage of scripture that I have ever seen. Paul is very clearly stating that it is better in his view to remain single if you want to exersise singular devotion to God because if you are married you then have responsabilities to your spouce that will consme your time and attention. Read the entire context Start at the begining of the chapter where he clearly begins talking about the topic because he starts by saying"Now for the matters you wrote about…he very quickly contradicts the conclusion you reach. Even if it was ok to wrench a scripture out of its context to support a doctrin(it is not) the verses you refrence can in no way be interpreted to mean what you say. Someone please tell me is the RCC using this scripture to support some doctrin of cellibate marrige? Or is this just one persons interpritation?
Celibacy is held in high regard by St. Paul and the Church. It is you who does not want to see this in this verse. ALL I have said that in this verse St. Paul was addressing those couples, who were betrothed AND who had made a vow of celibacy. This verse is within the context of the the whole. You seem to be implying then that really (in your mind) St. Paul was telling those who had made a vow of celibacy, and both able to and willing to keep it, to not do so and they HAD to engage in sexual intercourse in marriage.
Holding celibacy is high regard does NOT thereby hold marriage in low regard, in a secondary status. It is you who does, not Scripture. Scripture is simply including it in reference to the comparative abilities of the celibate/non-celibate to focus on the Lord.
Of course, I was also discussing this in the context of the relationship of Mary and Joseph, her perpetual virginity, and suggested that these couples were basing their lifestyle on Mary and Joseph. Which was in context, and your reply was not.