C
catherineajt
Guest
Interesting. I will talk to my priest about that, since I do want to embrace the fullness of the truth.The Eastern Catholic Church is required to embrace the IC doctrine.
Interesting. I will talk to my priest about that, since I do want to embrace the fullness of the truth.The Eastern Catholic Church is required to embrace the IC doctrine.
If you are willing, please let us know how it went.Interesting. I will talk to my priest about that, since I do want to embrace the fullness of the truth.
Yes, you should.Interesting. I will talk to my priest about that, since I do want to embrace the fullness of the truth.
If that is true about the Filioque, then why is “and the Son” not included in the creed spoken in the Ruthenian church?Yes, you should.
Don’t allow yourself to be mistaken on this point. Although that may not have been the original intent of the Orthodox bishops who came into communion with Rome, today the Supreme Pontiff and his Magisterium insist that you accept or otherwise embrace all Latin Catholic theological constructs. You are not required to understand them, but you must accept them as true.
This includes (but not necessarily limited to) the **Filioque, **Purgatory, the Immaculate Conception, Papal Universal Jurisdiction and Papal Infallibility.
Any deviation on these extra dogmas, but especially the last two, are grounds for excommunication latae sententae.
The Filioque was still recited in the first Ruthenian Catholic Church I attended seven years ago (when I was still in communion with Rome). But most of the Ruthenian Catholic Churches did not recite it (although it was printed in the pew books in parenthesis). The new 2007 reformed divine liturgy has removed it from the pew books. However, as a Church in communion with Rome, you must still accept that the Creed is proper with or without the Filioque.If that is true about the Filioque, then why is “and the Son” not included in the creed spoken in the Ruthenian church?
My understanding is that Eastern Catholics must accept the filioque as non-heretical, but are not at all required to add it to the creed. Just as they must accept the IC as non-heretical, but in Eastern Theology, it’s something of a non-issue given the Eastern approach to original sin.If that is true about the Filioque, then why is “and the Son” not included in the creed spoken in the Ruthenian church?
Sounds like more dichotomy.My understanding is that Eastern Catholics must accept the filioque as non-heretical, but are not at all required to add it to the creed. Just as they must accept the IC as non-heretical, but in Eastern Theology, it’s something of a non-issue given the Eastern approach to original sin.
I am surprised that no one has mentioned the Fourth Crusade in this context. It certainly did not contribute to good relations between the churches.Did Catholics and Orthodox fight religious wars with each other…
That is hurtful.The EO in this forum does seem to be hate Catholics, especially one EO who has been debating with me.
Then why do you want to cause division between the Latins and the EO?That is hurtful.
On the contrary Manny. I have stated more times than I can count, that I love my Latin/Eastern Catholic brothers and sisters. I have many family and friends in the Catholic Church. It is the Church that nourished me and led me to Holy Orthodoxy and I will always cherish that. I defend the Holy Orthodox Church and Her beliefs, but that should not be misconstrued as some type of hate! That is a terrible and uncharitable thing to say!![]()
I cause no division. I defend my faith. I am setting forth some of the basic differences between the Latin Catholic Church and Holy Orthodoxy.Then why do you want to cause division between the Latins and the EO?
Then why not follow your Patriarchs and promote unity instead of disunity.I cause no division. I defend my faith. I am setting forth some of the basic differences between the Latin Catholic Church and Holy Orthodoxy.
I don’t think we need to go there.I am surprised that no one has mentioned the Fourth Crusade in this context. It certainly did not contribute to good relations between the churches.
rossum
Our Patriarchs will promote unity without compromise.Then why not follow your Patriarchs and promote unity instead of disunity.
Then why do you call yourselves the Orthodox? I go to St. Pius X Catholic Church.From the Orthodox point of view, we Orthodox are already Catholic,Michael
Its because we have great hair.I am a convert to Catholicism so I am not culturally familar with this stuff. Excuse me.
I noticed in my research into Orthodoxy that they seem to dislike Catholics in a big way.
Wow! Thank you East and West! I think that is perhaps the nicest thing you have ever said to me! Perhaps we can start anew!I really don’t think Mickey or Hesychios hate Catholics. I have met EOs that do, but these two gentlemen do not.