M
The first order of business (and I am sure your Pontiff would agree) is to promote Truth.Then why not follow your Patriarchs and promote unity instead of disunity.
I donāt think we need to get into this kind of discussion. Calling ourselves Orthodox does not mean we reject the attribute of Catholic, just as calling yourself Catholic does not mean you reject the attribute of orthodox.Then why do you call yourselves the Orthodox? I go to St. Pius X Catholic Church.
Thank you.I really donāt think Mickey or Hesychios hate Catholics.
Same here!As it is, the formal legal name of my church was **Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church in America **until it was shortened to the Orthodox Church in America when it was granted autocephaly.
Sounds good Mickey. I ask your forgiveness too as I can be quite bombastic.Wow! Thank you East and West! I think that is perhaps the nicest thing you have ever said to me! Perhaps we can start anew!
If I have ever offended you, I ask for your forgiveness.
Peace and blessings,
Mickey
smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/17/17_1_29.gif
Why do we call oursevles Catholic when we are also Orthodox?Then why do you call yourselves the Orthodox? I go to St. Pius X Catholic Church.
I donāt deny Magisterial infallible teachings or the Magisteriumās authority. Calling intercommunion against Catholic tradition doesnāt mean Iām denying a Church dogma or questioning the Magisteriumās authority. I am, based on tradition, questioning the wisdom behind this novel official allowance to commune non-Catholics, even when members of their own clergy are available to provide the Mysteries to them.Diak said: It is certainly your right to reject Canon Law and other Magisterial proclamations which do not line up with your personal opinions, but please do not judge the Church for making these.
God bless you Alexios.Oh, and by the way, although I think there are many anti-Catholic EOs on the 'net, I havenāt gotten that impression from anyone here. We honestly disagree about matters, but that doesnāt make one anti-this or anti-that just because he doesnāt agree.
When have Catholics called themselves Orthodox?Why do we call oursevles Catholic when we are also Orthodox?
Slava Isusu Christu!what would you see as being the major differences between āCatholicā and āOrthodoxā beliefs ?
Uhā¦no. Reverse that.Would it be mainly down to the āCatholicā claims of Pontiff Supremacy and the developments that have flowed from that ?
.
I think youāre trying to create a distinction where none exists. Youāre right in saying that āreconciliation from the Catholic point of view pretty much means Orthodox have to become Catholicā; but from the Orthodox point of view reconciliation pretty much means Catholics have to become Orthodox.I noticed in my research into Orthodoxy that they seem to dislike Catholics in a big way. Most Catholics seem to believe the differences are minimal (in my opinion they are not minimal) and want reconciliation, but Orthodox do not. I can understand this much from the Orthodox, after all, reconciliation from the Catholic point of view pretty much means Orthodox have to become Catholic.
Your point about making Orthodox become Catholic is true, from the Roman Catholic perspective. We would have to abandon Holy Orthodoxy in order to achieve unity according to the Roman Catholic definition.
Your point about making the SSPX become Catholic is true, from the modernist perspective. We would have to abandon Holy tradition in order to achieve unity according to the modernist Roman Catholic definition.From the Orthodox point of view, we Orthodox are already Catholic, have been continually, and your church has no right to judge us or claim we are not. Your church cannot expel us or drive us out. The CAF has decided that Orthodox are not to call themselves Catholic on this forum because of the confusion it brings to the participants here, and I abide. But the reality is the Orthodox communion has always been Catholic, and any Orthodox bishop will tell you so.
I must inform you what you have stated about Photius is a myth with no basis in historical fact. Francis Dvornikās book āThe Photian Schismā confirms with proof that there was in fact no Photian Schism and that most of what has been taught about him in the Latin Church (and to a lesser degree the anti latin sentiment attributed to him by the Orthodox Church) for the past 800 years is completely false.The anti-West sentiment got increased by a man called Photius in I think the 9th century, who managed to get the Byzantine Emperor to depose the rightful Patriarch of Constantinople and put him in his place, noly to be deposed by the Pope with the rightful Patriarch put back. He thus tried to stir up anti-Pope feelings to ry to be allowed to keep his position. He is the sourse of the filioque controversy.
I am a convert to Catholicism so I am not culturally familar with this stuff. Excuse me.
I noticed in my research into Orthodoxy that they seem to dislike Catholics in a big way. Most Catholics seem to believe the differences are minimal (in my opinion they are not minimal) and want reconciliation, but Orthodox do not. I can understand this much from the Orthodox, after all, reconciliation from the Catholic point of view pretty much means Orthodox have to become Catholic.
However, there is often kind of anti-Catholic animosity coming from Orthodox which rivals even that of evangelical Protestantism. What is the cause of this? Did Catholics and Orthodox fight religious wars with each other⦠what is it? Itās so emotional and thick that I would like to know where it comes from.