B
Ben_Masada
Guest
I didn’t mean on a formal manner. But because Paul was the one to start Christianity, I consider him the first Pope. Of course, I know that even the word is of a late invention. Even the first Bishop in Antioch he was not properly called, although Antioch was his headquarters until he was arrested and taken to Rome where he died.I agree that “Church” references in the NT is largely interpolation by the later church, but I don’t agree that Paul was the first “pope”. There are several references in the ECF that Linus was the first bishop of Rome, almost none that Peter was. Actually there is evidence that Peter was bishop of Antioch. Interesting of course is the fact that Paul in righting to the Romans, makes no mention in his salutation to Peter, and Paul is quite careful to address all the important personages. He would of course probably not written at all to the Romans had Paul been there as Bishop, since it would have been clear overstepping. As far as I know, Paul was bishop nowhere in the entire Roman Empire.
Ben: