P
PClark456
Guest
I think the only time you should separate genders is when the conversation warrants it. Subjects like sex, vocations and dignity of marriage is best spoken to small groups separated by gender.
Probably. My biggest issue was that most of my friends from before were male - I just didn’t seem to have anything in common with the young women my age. We did talk about certain issues alone, but the times I had to experience basic Bible study in separate groups just never seemed to be half as worthwhile.I think the only time you should separate genders is when the conversation warrants it. Subjects like sex, vocations and dignity of marriage is best spoken to small groups separated by gender.
Some youth ministry over focuses on “experiential”, often as a competitive response to Young Life, and other Evangelical Protestant groups.
There is no acknowledgement of forming the intellect or developing the will, or the interior life. It’s all aimed at the emotions, and this is mere little wind in the sail.
Excellent observation…youth ministry as day care. It’s a real problem. For example, I ordered the Theology of the Body program materials on a trial basis, and couldn’t get parents to show up to watch the parent’s video segment. Their own kids, but the parents don’t seem concerned about what I’m going to present to their kids. Now I may have to return the program which is too bad, because I think it’s excellent and if it keeps one kid from getting pregnant, “date-raped,” etc…Please…I am being too argumentative. I am from a very big parish…and the unintended consequence of YM in our parish is parents dropping off their kids as if it’s just another soccer match, piano class, Karate class, etc. They detach.
It’s unfortunate that just as in the public schools, differentiated learning and application of multiple intelligence theory are very difficult to put into practice. And in multi-age learning situations, its virtually impossible unless the instructor: student ratio is very, very low.I wonder about this - how much is just a problem of lumping all “youth” together? I mean, do we put all adults into the same program? That was my experience - it’s hard to do a good youth ministry because, just like with adults, not all “youth” of the same age need or benefit from the same thing. I would have preferred to sit down quietly and study; I hated the loud “let’s get excited for Jesus!” events. Others in the group had trouble staying focused for long periods of quiet but benefited from the concerts and dramas. It really felt like the program was trying to shoehorn everyone into the same mold of “what’s best for the youth” while ignoring our individual differences.
That’s exactly how I felt!! There may be a solution though. I took a seminar on youth ministry and the presenter was a youth minister with a vibrant youth group. He said he had the same problem you described, and not many were coming as a result. So what he ended up doing was having almost three different youth groups. One was just pure social, for kids who had no interest in religion, in order to open them up to the idea that maybe being Catholic isn’t so bad. Then another for the “let’s get excited for Jesus” crowd like you were talking about. It gave the basics of the faith too. Then he started another one for those who wanted to go deeper. It was a bible study/apologetics meeting.I wonder about this - how much is just a problem of lumping all “youth” together? I mean, do we put all adults into the same program? That was my experience - it’s hard to do a good youth ministry because, just like with adults, not all “youth” of the same age need or benefit from the same thing. I would have preferred to sit down quietly and study; I hated the loud “let’s get excited for Jesus!” events. Others in the group had trouble staying focused for long periods of quiet but benefited from the concerts and dramas. It really felt like the program was trying to shoehorn everyone into the same mold of “what’s best for the youth” while ignoring our individual differences.
I bring it up often, actually. I’ve given talks and workshops on Lectio Divina, mendicant spirituality, and Gospel Poverty.When do you plan on teaching about the 9 levels of prayer, St. John of the Cross, and the interior life? People need to get past vocal prayer.
I’m 30 currently, we’re about the same age. The difference is that where, I’ve seen where the youth and volunteers have gone, several have become active within the church community, building solid (and large) families, and continue on to do youth ministry in there own right. I current help support six university missionaries. Out of them, three were youth, two were volunteers, and the sixth was a youth who became the assistant youth coordinator at our church and then accepted God’s call for her to be a missionary to university students.You’re 20 now. You’re still young. I’m almost 30 and have seen where the LifeTeen crowd of my youth have gone, and it isn’t the straight and narrow path.
As I described above, it can and does. Just because your program didn’t work out well (or the way you wanted it to) does not mean every program is like this. It would be like if I painted every member of the FSSP the same based on meeting the Sede’s who attended their parish that I ran into.The problem is LifeTeen does not bear fruit.
Actually, eventually the youth grow up and have a solid faith, as their faith matures as well. Looking back, I see those who never put any investment into their time within the program, and they did fall away. Others, on the otherhand, did invest and in my parish we’re seeing the fruits of those now.It makes youth feel warm fuzzies for a few years, but eventually those youth grow up and outgrow those warm fuzzies and seek different “Warm fuzzies”
I agree, which is why these are being taught at Life Teen parishes across the globe.It’s not that we’re “holier than thou”, but we are concerned for all souls involved. These youth are going to have to bear crosses, and thus will need a good solid foundation from the saints to bear those crosses.
For whatever this is worth, I had a little discussion with a catechist the other day. A woman of retirement age, she asked (demanded?) that our faith formation program include a May Crowning because “these kids need to know this stuff”. In fact, though our faith formation program generally wraps up for the year at the end of April, I had always thought that a “crowning” would be a nice way to close the year.You just proved my point. Your objections are that we’re trying to be just like the “rah rah rah” churches. Sorry, but from my own experience, I dare say it’s not true. Take the high school group I volunteer for: we will have a meal, watch a video (typically), then break up into small groups and have deep dicussions about it.
Also, we have a college group in which we read Henri Nouwen’s book *The Life of the Beloved *. Now we are watching a series of videos of a Presbyterian minister listening to and answering ojbections from atheists. Aside from the fact that it’s a Protestant pastor answering it, it really generates discussion that bears fruit. For example, we were able to explain the Catholic Church’s teaching on evolution from it.
And then at a confirmation session last year, we showed the 8th graders Catholic Answers, LifeTeen, and Fr. Robert Barron, as well as teaching them the new Mass translation, and many other deep things.