T
Tantum_ergo
Guest
I notice you don’t ask, “Is it true that a person WHO HAS OBSERVED ALL THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS BLESSING and dies wearing it. . .”
Why is that?
Why is that?
Didn’t notice it. Lets throw that in to. Is this true? Is it true that a person who dies wearing this scapluar will be set free from purgatory on the first Saturday after their death?I notice you don’t ask, “Is it true that a person WHO HAS OBSERVED ALL THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS BLESSING and dies wearing it. . .”
Why is that?
If they do what was required of them. The scapular is not a get-out-of-jail-free card after all wherein you just wear it yet keep on sinning.Didn’t notice it. Lets throw that in to. Is this true? Is it true that a person who dies wearing this scapluar will be set free from purgatory on the first Saturday after their death?
Becuase he doenst understand Catholic teachings at all. He askes questions, for instance, about the brown scapular and purgatory yet he does not have a clue as to what Catholic teaching on purgatory is. He came to ridicule-not to learn.The **brown scapular **isn’t part of Catholic doctrine or dogmas. I don’t see the point of bring this up.
This would go in another thread. It does not belong here.
I don’t know why Justasking can’t get past the scapular. He could just as easily ask about Fatima or any other private revelation.Becuase he doenst understand Catholic teachings at all. He askes questions, for instance, about the brown scapular and purgatory yet he does not have a clue as to what Catholic teaching on purgatory is. He came to ridicule-not to learn.
Former Catholics were likely poorly catechized. Knowing what we have, how on earth could you leave it? Protestants dislike what they think the Catholic church is-not what it actually is. Additionally, Protestants must spend 50% of their time being anti-Catholic and 50% being Christian. Catholics get to be Christian 100% of the time. We have no separation to explain.I never understand this. Why do Protestants especially Ex-Catholics persume to know Catholic Church doctrines and dogma, but they don’t really know it.
These are some false presumption of Protestants of what the Catholic Church supposedly believe. There of course countless others, which they think we believe and professed.
- They think we worship Mary, we don’t.
- They think think our doctrines are invented doctrines but they aren’t.
- They think the whatever the Popes says is infallible, when in fact it that infallibility is that the Holy Spirit preserves the Pope from teaching error when speaking moral and faith teaching
- That the sacrifice of the Mass is re-sacrifice when it isn’t. It is to make presence the sacrifice at the cross which transcends time itself.
Unfortunately, those who have gone through Purgatory and are now in Heaven are unable to contact us, so nobody knows. It’s a mystery.Didn’t notice it. Lets throw that in to. Is this true? Is it true that a person who dies wearing this scapluar will be set free from purgatory on the first Saturday after their death?
Becuase he thinks that if we dont all ambrace the brown scapulay it means the Catholic Church is a false Church!I don’t know why Justasking can’t get past the scapular. He could just as easily ask about Fatima or any other private revelation.There’s not that much of a difference…
So, then as a “biblical christian”, for whom the bible is the inerrant word of God…you deny what James said?
Infallibility is the charism that Jesus gave to the church that He would not allow it to fall into error (the HS will guide you into all truth, and I will be with you till the end of the age). It applies to the official teaching of the church on matters of faith and morals.What does infalliblity have to do with the truth?
Yes, an infallible proclaimation is one which is considered a truth divinely revealed to the Church by the Holy Spirit.Is it because something is proclaimed infallibly you must believe it?
This is certainly the case. It is also true that some Catholics are uneducated, and don’t know the difference between private devotional practices that are permitted, and divinely revealed truths that are considered part of the deposit of faith to which we are all bound.If that is the case, there are still many other truth claims and practices that are not proclaimed infallibly true and yet people believe them to be true.
Some private revelations are only true, or most true, for the persons to whom they are revealed. For example, God revealed to Joseph in dream that he should get up, take the child and His mother, and flee to Egypt. Do all of us think we should make a pilgrimmage to Egypt, and remain there until God calls us home? However, it is “true” and is considered a valid revelation to Joseph.Are not these claims also true? Are they not also part of the fullness of the truth?
I think you may be confusing “fullness of faith” with “fullness of truth”. The Catholic Church does not claim to teach the “truth” about everything that can be known by man, but only those matters of faith and morals revealed by God for our salvation.For example, how do you know exactly what is the “fullness of the truth” and what is not? Since you call me ignorant, then teach me if you can.
I don’t think this is right, either. I think there are many things inspiried by the HS that have not been considered infallible. For example, look at all the religious orders and apostolic missions! They are held up as good for the faithful, but only to those that are called to them. Mother Theresa used to send people away all the time because she determined they were not called to that apostolate. Just because something does not apply to everyone does not mean it is not inspiried by the Spirit.While infallibly = correctly, non-infallibly does not = wrong. It just means the Holy Spirit didn’t inspire it. May be right, may be wrong; Catholics are not required to believe it is correct.
I don’t think this is right, either. I think there are many things inspiried by the HS that have not been considered infallible. For example, look at all the religious orders and apostolic missions! They are held up as good for the faithful, but only to those that are called to them. Mother Theresa used to send people away all the time because she determined they were not called to that apostolate. Just because something does not apply to everyone does not mean it is not inspiried by the Spirit.While infallibly = correctly, non-infallibly does not = wrong. It just means the Holy Spirit didn’t inspire it. May be right, may be wrong; Catholics are not required to believe it is correct.
I do not think this is the best way to characterize it, no. No “claims” are taught, but the official teaching is only what has been revealed by God. Furthermore, many things are inspired by the HS that are not part of the official teaching of the Church. The ones we are required to believe have been defined by the Magesterium.Are the teachings that are claimed to be inspired by the Holy Spirit the only ones that you know are true and required to believe?
Guanophore, you teach well.Infallibility is the charism that Jesus gave to the church that He would not allow it to fall into error (the HS will guide you into all truth, and I will be with you till the end of the age). It applies to the official teaching of the church on matters of faith and morals.
Yes, an infallible proclaimation is one which is considered a truth divinely revealed to the Church by the Holy Spirit.
This is certainly the case. It is also true that some Catholics are uneducated, and don’t know the difference between private devotional practices that are permitted, and divinely revealed truths that are considered part of the deposit of faith to which we are all bound.
Some private revelations are only true, or most true, for the persons to whom they are revealed. For example, God revealed to Joseph in dream that he should get up, take the child and His mother, and flee to Egypt. Do all of us think we should make a pilgrimmage to Egypt, and remain there until God calls us home? However, it is “true” and is considered a valid revelation to Joseph.
I think you may be confusing “fullness of faith” with “fullness of truth”. The Catholic Church does not claim to teach the “truth” about everything that can be known by man, but only those matters of faith and morals revealed by God for our salvation.
We distinguish between what is necessary and what is not by following the Magesterium, that body appointed by God to discern these matters.
Huh? What do you do when you are praying to some saint that may be in purgatory? Can they hear you there?Unfortunately, those who have gone through Purgatory and are now in Heaven are unable to contact us, so nobody knows. It’s a mystery.![]()
There seems to be some confusion on this thread what doctrine and dogma means. Here are a couple of definitions.The **brown scapular **isn’t part of Catholic doctrine or dogmas. I don’t see the point of bring this up.
This would go in another thread. It does not belong here.
Huh? What do you do when you are praying to some saint that may be in purgatory? Can they hear you there?
But the Brown Scapular is not part of Catholic Dogma! That link will show you a list of the “Fundamentals” of the Catholic Faith. Those and those ONLY are what the Church has declared, “If you want to call yourself a Catholic and not be a liar, you must believe these things.” Brown Scapulars are not on that list!!There seems to be some confusion on this thread what doctrine and dogma means. Here are a couple of definitions.
This is a definition of doctrine:
rule or principle: a rule or principle that forms the basis of a belief, theory, or policy
ideas taught as truth: a body of ideas, particularly in religion, taught to people as truthful or correct
This is what dogma means:
RELIGION religious belief: a belief or set of beliefs that a religion holds to be true
As you can see by these definitions this topic does belong here. That being the case, discussing things like the Brown Scapular is appropriate and necessary if we are to understand catholic doctrines and practices.
It may not be a defined dogma but it is a doctrine by definition.Pixie Dust;2666077]But the Brown Scapular is not part of Catholic Dogma! That link will show you a list of the “Fundamentals” of the Catholic Faith. Those and those ONLY are what the Church has declared, “If you want to call yourself a Catholic and not be a liar, you must believe these things.” Brown Scapulars are not on that list!!
Did i read correctly that in this blog the nun said that catholics are to believe this when she writes:Here is an excellent, no holds barred explanation of the Scapular for you from a bona-fide Catholic Nun with a blog.
We need to discuss these things to if you are up to it.I don’t know why Justasking can’t get past the scapular. He could just as easily ask about Fatima or any other private revelation.There’s not that much of a difference…