Why do Protestants stay Protestant

  • Thread starter Thread starter sadie2723
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Fredricks:
Another typical set up.
Why are you so cynical Fredericks? Why are you so judgemental? Why can’t you believe that somebody may simply be honestly curious? These attitudes sure are’nt consistent with someone who’s been saved and has a real faith in Christ.

By the way, I noiticed your link to Norman Geisler’s stuff. As far as anti-Catholic apologists go, he’s pretty weak.
 
To Lazerlike42,

That was basically my testimony on how I came to know personally Jesus Christ as my personal Lord and Savior.
It wasn’t completely based upon “the people” but I realized that
the way the people were was an open display of the fruit of the ministry, and Jesus said," you shall know them by their fruit."

It is very true what you said about the core beliefs of a church is what really matters, its not the people. Does it measure up scripturally ? thats the bottom line.

How does one determine if something is right or wrong concerning doctrine ? It depends on who your authority is.
I measure authority according to the word of God, not measure the word of God by what mans authority says, because their are alot of false teachers degrading the Word of God and claiming to have a more pure revelation, and their way is the right way and the only way.

The word of God is the standard.
 
40.png
JesusHasMyHeart:
But I noticed very many inconsistentcies with the way people would go to church on Sunday, after partying and drinking Saturday. Not only the people but the priests also at our Fall festival could drink it down with the best of them. To me this was a red flag and not very Christ like.
You should not base your faith on what others are doing around you but on what is Truth. I assume you have no sinners in your new church. But is Jesus there? Jesus came for the sinners, not the righteous.

You couldn’t look to the lives of the saints for a Christian witness? You judge and condemn others and then join a new man-made church? The solution doesn’t sound very wise. Turn your back on His Church and Truth because you see sinners? Why did you not make an attempt to let your witness help those you were concerned about? :hmmm:
 
40.png
JesusHasMyHeart:
So after that, I continued going to the Catholic church that i was raised in, and I realized I couldn’t hear what the priest was really saying, the sound system was bad and the echo made it hard to hear him. But before that it didn’t bother me, but after my ears were opened Spiritually I realized how dead it was in there. People praying with their eyes open and barely anyone sang the worship songs, they really looked to me like a bunch of zombies, and i thought that was me and how i was before the Lord came to me.
They did not have sound-systems or entertainment in early Christian worship. The Mass is a solemn event to some degree as we are present at Calvary - His once-for-all sacrifice being the focus of the Mass.

catholic.com/thisrock/1990/9006chap.asp

Christ is present in the consecrated Eucharist. I would take Christ and a faulty sound-system over a Christian rock band any day.
Then i went to a non-denominational church were they taught the bible and worshipped like they meant it and prayed with their eyes closed and from the heart.
If you go to Mass every day for 3 years you will have heard the entire bible (including the books the Protestants threw out).
The bible study was like nothing i ever heard before, the Pastor spoke so clearly and read the bible with such clarity and it all made sense. And the people didn’t party and they spoke of the Lord and encouraged me in my walk with the Lord and prayed for me alot. I knew i was in the right place, I’ve even gone back from time to time to my old church and realized it was a religion not a relationship with God, it all was so dead, no Spirit was there, people just doing their weekly duty. So i never went back, but I do pray for them, and will always have a place in my heart to see them come into a relationship with God according to Spirit and truth.
Again you are relying on others for your own spiritual nourishment. Is going to church supposed to be a social club or a time for communion with God? How do you know those people that appear “dead” are not in quiet, meditative prayer?
It is one thing to believe in God in your mind, and another to know Him in your heart and daily experience.
St. Teresa of Avila, St. Therese of Lisieux… There are so many saints who have known Him in their heart daily.

Does your inter-denominational church have daily “Mass”? We can even receive Him in the Eucharist daily. Why would you turn your back on that?
 
40.png
JesusHasMyHeart:
To Lazerlike42,

That was basically my testimony on how I came to know personally Jesus Christ as my personal Lord and Savior.
It wasn’t completely based upon “the people” but I realized that
the way the people were was an open display of the fruit of the ministry, and Jesus said," you shall know them by their fruit."

It is very true what you said about the core beliefs of a church is what really matters, its not the people. Does it measure up scripturally ? thats the bottom line.

How does one determine if something is right or wrong concerning doctrine ? It depends on who your authority is.
I measure authority according to the word of God, not measure the word of God by what mans authority says, because their are alot of false teachers degrading the Word of God and claiming to have a more pure revelation, and their way is the right way and the only way.

The word of God is the standard.
That is true. But how do you know what it says? You are making your new pastor the final authority, or his interpretation. Or maybe you disagree with him, in which case you are making yourself the final authority. This is not right, as the Scriptures point out (2 Peter 1:20, 3:16) God ought to be your final authority. God is not the author of confusion (1 Cor 14:33) as there is in Protestantism and non-denominationalism, where there are tens of thousands of churches all disagreeing with one another. If He is not the author of confusion, then He could not have authored a religion where there are tens of thousands of disagreeing churches. If the Bible is truly His word, then He must have left some authority to interpret it here on earth so that there would not be this confusion. This is why He left us His Church. If He did not really leave us His Church, then the Bible is not really His word, because He would have left the book that created more confusion in the world then any other.
 
Lazerlike42 said:
Why are you so cynical Fredericks? Why are you so judgemental? Why can’t you believe that somebody may simply be honestly curious? These attitudes sure are’nt consistent with someone who’s been saved and has a real faith in Christ.
Im cynical?
Im judgemental?
My attitudes are not consistent with someone who has been saved?
I do not have real faith in Christ?
Based upon…
Someone asks Protestants a question and then it is used as a springboard to criticize and i call it a setup?
Wow. I will tell you what. Next time someone calls something a set up, I will try to be more Christlike and call them cynical, judgemental, not saved, and not having faith. Will do!
By the way, I noiticed your link to Norman Geisler’s stuff. As far as anti-Catholic apologists go, he’s pretty weak.

Good. He, like me, is not anti-Catholic. He is reasonable presents both sides, without the vitriol and I like his stuff. I am not a Jack Chick kinda guy. Is that what is considered not weak?
Anti-Catholic? Tell you what, if you set up an apologetics board, you are asking people to engage in “apologetics”. What do you expect? I am not anti-Catholic, I would never in a million years do a thing to harm anyone. I am presenting our side as best as I know how. I happen to think a Protestant perspective is wanted by a lot of people. They do respond, so they must.
I am anti, a lot of stuff, but not Catholics. I just think you guys have it wrong on many things. But my goodness, I have never once said you guys are not saved. Get real
 
40.png
Fredricks:
Im cynical?
Im judgemental?
My attitudes are not consistent with someone who has been saved?
I do not have real faith in Christ?
Based upon…
Someone asks Protestants a question and then it is used as a springboard to criticize and i call it a setup?
Wow. I will tell you what. Next time someone calls something a set up, I will try to be more Christlike and call them cynical, judgemental, not saved, and not having faith. Will do!
You would have to judge the person’s heart to be able to call it a setup. Maybe if it were some other question I would agree it was a setup, but honestly this question is one that just rings of curiosity to me. We spend all our time on these boards debating back and forth, doesn’t it make sense to have a thread set up to understand one another better? It is just the parallel thread to “Why do Protestants become Catholic,” it’s not a set up, and it’s clearly not. That’s why I say you are cynical, because you seem to be seeing something negative in everything, and because of the blunt, almost rude way you put it in your post.
Good. He, like me, is not anti-Catholic. He is reasonable presents both sides, without the vitriol and I like his stuff. I am not a Jack Chick kinda guy. Is that what is considered not weak?
Anti-Catholic? Tell you what, if you set up an apologetics board, you are asking people to engage in “apologetics”. What do you expect? I am not anti-Catholic, I would never in a million years do a thing to harm anyone. I am presenting our side as best as I know how. I happen to think a Protestant perspective is wanted by a lot of people. They do respond, so they must.
I am anti, a lot of stuff, but not Catholics. I just think you guys have it wrong on many things. But my goodness, I have never once said you guys are not saved. Get real
I didn’t say his arguements are weak because he disagrees, I said they are weak because I could refute most of them when I had only been studying Catholicism for a few weeks.
 
Hi: JesusHasMyHeart
The following verses are a promise form God that he has given to us Christians the ability to understand His Word. God did not intend for His Word to be locked up in a church, and keep away from Christians. He tells us in Colossians 3:16 "Let the Word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom.

(1Co 2:9) But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard,
neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.

(1Co 2:10) But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.

(1Co 2:11) For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.

(1Co 2:12) Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.

forever Baptist
allischalmers
 
I just want to say that I am grateful for posters like Fredericks. Unlike some people who come here just to be antagonistic, Fredericks actually engages in debate.

If we did not have anyone coming in here questioning what we believe, we would not have the opportunity to explain our beliefs.

I think many non-Catholics who have read through threads in which posters like Fredericks have participated have learned a lot from them. They can see Catholic responses to questions they may also have had. Then we leave it to them to decide (with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, hopefully!)

God has shown us many ways in which He turns error or deception into something fruitful for the faith (I am not saying you are *trying *to deceive Fredericks, but your believe-system and that of all Protestants is based on error and deception).

Having posters like him are useful for us to evangelize to others - unless, of course, we don’t take the time to respond.

By the way, I just want to mention that the words “judgment” and “argument” are not spelled like this “judgement” or “arguement”. I’m sorry to be such a spelling stickler but I see this mistake made so often on these forums, I had to mention it. Sorry everyone. I’ll hope you’ll forgive me for pointing it out. :o
 
40.png
Eden:
I just want to say that I am grateful for posters like Fredericks. Unlike some people who come here just to be antagonistic, Fredericks actually engages in debate.

If we did not have anyone coming in here questioning what we belive, we would not have the opportunity to explain our beliefs.

I think many non-Catholics who have read through threads in which posters like Fredericks have participated have learned a lot from them. They can see Catholic responses to questions they may also have had. Then we leave it to them to decide (with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, hopefully!)

God has shown us many ways in which He turns error or deception into something fruitful for the faith (I am not saying you are *trying *to deceive Fredericks, but your believe-system and that of all Protestants is based on error and deception).

Having posters like him are useful for us to evangelize to others - unless, of course, we don’t take the time to respond.

By the way, I just want to mention that the words “judgment” and “argument” are not spelled like this “judgement” or “arguement”. I’m sorry to be such a spelling stickler but I see this mistake made so often on these forums, I had to mention it. Sorry everyone. I’ll hope you’ll forgive me for pointing it out. :o
Thanks Eden.
The only problem is you appear to believe I am HELPING the Catholic side. In which case, I am deafeating my own purposes!
 
40.png
Fredricks:
Thanks Eden.
The only problem is you appear to believe I am HELPING the Catholic side. In which case, I am deafeating my own purposes!
I do believe you are. Please keep posting! 😛
 
40.png
Lazerlike42:
40.png
Fredricks:
You would have to judge the person’s heart to be able to call it a setup. Maybe if it were some other question I would agree it was a setup, but honestly this question is one that just rings of curiosity to me. We spend all our time on these boards debating back and forth, doesn’t it make sense to have a thread set up to understand one another better? It is just the parallel thread to “Why do Protestants become Catholic,” it’s not a set up, and it’s clearly not. That’s why I say you are cynical, because you seem to be seeing something negative in everything, and because of the blunt, almost rude way you put it in your post.

I didn’t say his arguements are weak because he disagrees, I said they are weak because I could refute most of them when I had only been studying Catholicism for a few weeks.
So calling something a set up IS justification for calling someone cyncial, judgemental, and questioning their salvation and faith? Just trying to make sure I understand.
I am blunt. I was not aware that being blunt causes someone to lose their salvation or not have faith. I also thought that calling someone judgemental is in of itself, “judgemental”
DO you find it rude if someone questions someones salvation because of perceived rudeness?
 
40.png
Fredricks:
40.png
Lazerlike42:
So calling something a set up IS justification for calling someone cyncial, judgemental, and questioning their salvation and faith? Just trying to make sure I understand.
I am blunt. I was not aware that being blunt causes someone to lose their salvation or not have faith. I also thought that calling someone judgemental is in of itself, “judgemental”
DO you find it rude if someone questions someones salvation because of perceived rudeness?
I don’t intend to be rude to you, I just believe that based on your post you are making judgments of a person that goes beyond their actions. Let’s look at the original post:
40.png
sadie2723:
I am pulling this off another similar thread that I have been enjoying a lot. It was called Why do Protestants become Catholic. Well, I am interested in the other side of things. Why do Protestants not convert?

Let’s get it on!
Sadie said that he is posting it as a parallel thread to the Why do Protestants become Catholic because he had been enjoying that one a lot, and because he is interested to learn about the perspective of Protestants aside from the technical, this verse vs. that verse stuff that is discussed around here all the time. If you believe it is a set up, then you have to believe that A) sadie lied about it simply being a parallel thread, B) he lied about simply enjoying the other one, and C) he lied about wanting to understand Protestants’ perspectives. Even if you only believe he is lying about one of them, you are still making a judgment that is wrong to make. You can judge a person’s actions, but never their heart. You can only call someone a liar when you have evidenciary proof for it. Otherwise, it is nothing more or less than judging an internal aspect of his heart which only God can see. I said you were cynical because there is no way one could get “set up” out of the OP unless they are already coming in with the a priori conclusion that something sneaky is going on. A person would have to believe that Catholics are not honest to come to the conclusion you did.
 
Fredericks - I wanted to say that I find your signature “the truth is never afraid” very appropriate, on this the first anniversary of Pope John Paul II’s death.

On the day he was announced as the new pope, he said:

“Be not afraid. Open wide the doors to Christ!”

I went on a pilgrimage to Denver for World Youth Day in 1993 as a teenager and I think of him as “the young people’s pope”.

“My Dear Young People… of every continent, do not be afraid to be the saints of the new millennium! Be contemplative, love prayer; be coherent with your faith and generous in the service of your brothers and sisters, be active members of the Church and builders of peace. To succeed in this demanding project of life, continue to listen to His Word…” - Pope John Paul II

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
I notice how you do not answer my questin about not being saved. In my circles, questioning someones salvation usually occurs when you hear about a cheating spouse, killer, child molestor, pretty serious stuff. You seem to skip around that.

So when I said this was a set up, you think I am calling someone a liar?
They said, “lets get it on”. Do you think they wanted to know opinions and not argue? Silly me for thinking that someone only wanted to know Protestant opinions to jump all over them. All I said was it was a set up, which is how things go around these parts, its part of the territory. I never cried about it. I just had one simple sentence.
You do not think you are judging me?!
Do you not see what you are doing?
You questioned someones salvation. The worst slap in the face a believer can do to a believer. I thought only God could decide that but no, you have made yourself judge and jury from one little sentence, which I had reason, “lets get it on”, to conclude. Did I say Sadie lied? NO. I am adressing what Sadie wrote. What are you doing? Questioning someones salvation? I cannot even imagine. Suit yourself.
 
40.png
LCMS_No_More:
In my case it was because of misinformation and lies about what the Church actually teaches and believes. Most protestants will agree with every single line of the Nicene Creed but still call the Catholic Church the Whore of Babylon because of what they’ve been told about her.

It’s really sad, too. It took me years to finally work it all out and come to the conclusion that the Catholic Church is the true Church. Thanks be to God, I hope to be received, Confirmed and receive my first Holy Communion on April 15th!
I couldn’t agree more. that’s what I was taught also.
I think most former protestants would agree.
 
40.png
Fredricks:
I am anti, a lot of stuff, but not Catholics. I just think you guys have it wrong on many things.
If you feel that Catholics have many things wrong, then this means you are against many of their teachings and doctrines. Isn’t that anti-Catholic?
 
40.png
JesusHasMyHeart:
Well I continued at this particular church and began to have some questions and a close family friend was a deacon at another Catholic church of Jesuit order, he told me not to read the bible, it was only for the priests to interpret.
Your deacon was mistaken. Here is a link to what the catechism says about reading and interpretting scripture.

Notice paragraph 104. “In the sacred books, the Father who is in heaven comes lovingly to meet his children, and talks with them.”

Sure sounds like more than just priests should be reading the bible to me. Paragraphs 109 through 114 talk about interpretation. There is nothing in there that says only priests should read or intepret the bible. Now if your interpretation differs from the church, that means there is a problem with your interpretation. You are probably not considering one of the three criteria stated in the catechism.
About a year later I went on a retreat in the mountains with our church, well we broke off into small groups and they asked each of us to pray from the heart, I have never been asked to do that before, I only knew memorized prayers or prayers from a book. So when it came my turn to pray I just wept and asked myself, who am I kidding anyway, I didn’t know how to talk to God from my heart, I believed in Him, but didn’t know Him, so I just wept and realized in my heart, I was just playing church, I had friends that I grew up with there and it was the good thing to do, but that was about it.
The next day they asked us to go on a Jesus walk and bring a bible or a prayer book, I brought my bible and went to a very peaceful place in the snow and sat on a log with bible on my lap, I opened it again in sincerity said, “I don’t understand this”
and a wind from nowhere came and began to blow the thin pages quickly, at that very moment I felt the presense of God for the first time, and He spoke to me in a still small voice saying, “I will show you MY word” 3xs and i said, yes Lord.
I guess I’m confused. You had never read the bible and were taught not to. But it was on a catholic retreat that you were encouraged to read your Bible and where God revealed himself to you in his word. Then you left the church because Catholics discourage people from reading the Bible. Do you see a contradiction here?
 
40.png
JesusHasMyHeart:
I actually am the opposite, I was raised Catholic and come from a long line of Italian and Irish Catholic background.
…snip…

Then i went to a non-denominational church were they taught the bible and worshipped like they meant it and prayed with their eyes closed and from the heart. The bible study was like nothing i ever heard before, the Pastor spoke so clearly and read the bible with such clarity and it all made sense. And the people didn’t party and they spoke of the Lord and encouraged me in my walk with the Lord and prayed for me alot. I knew i was in the right place, I’ve even gone back from time to time to my old church and realized it was a religion not a relationship with God, it all was so dead, no Spirit was there, people just doing their weekly duty. So i never went back, but I do pray for them, and will always have a place in my heart to see them come into a relationship with God according to Spirit and truth.
It is one thing to believe in God in your mind, and another to know Him in your heart and daily experience.
There are some similarities between us, except for one very very important thing.

The disastrous belief in Sola Scriptura and the errant doctrines of the post reformation n-Cs like the one that you are in.

You need to get over the emotional solace you feel and get into the doctrines that have been taught for 2,000 years by the real New Testament Christians. The truth shows that the post reformers do not teach the same beliefs about what the Bible says. Let me offer you a couple of theads just to begin with The Eucharist IS Scriptural and Priestly Celibacy. Just for a start.

It was only when I actually looked into why the Catholic Church teaches the things that it does and compared it to n-C teachings that I saw the gross errors that are taught as Biblical truths outside the Catholic Church.

As the Mary Foundation says, “Get the facts. Decide for yourself.”
Pax tecum,
 
Church Militant:
It was only when I actually looked into why the Catholic Church teaches the things that it does and compared it to n-C teachings that I saw the gross errors that are taught as Biblical truths outside the Catholic Church.
Yes. Once you read the Scriptures, and then read what the earliest Chritians wrote, and then see the continual teaching up until the reformation, everything becomes quite clear. 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top