Actually, you didn’t “clarify” it. Someone else said something you didn’t, and you agreed with him.
Yes. I clarified that I agreed with his wording. Sometimes I don’t word stuff f correctly. If that means I am grossly ignorant of Catholicism I am sorry.
Not attending Mass isn’t proof that someone doesn’t “know Jesus”, but this is the claim you’ve made. It’s your job to prove that point.
Isn’t missing mass (under the circumstances described above) a mortal sin? And isn’t it true that if one dies unrepentant in a mortal sin they go to hell? Well if that is true, then you have a scenario where one is destined for hell and knows Christ at the same time. That is a contradiction.
You are still arguing that the CC should rejoice when a Catholic (and we don’t assume that Catholics don’t “know Jesus” even if they don’t go to Mass every week), denying the Church that Christ founded.
It is not a solution to the mortal sin of not attending Mass regularly (without good cause). You seem to be unaware of this very basic Catholic concept. The solution to Mass attendance isn’t to walk away from the CC altogethe, leaving the Sacraments, including the Holy Eucharist, which is the real presence of Christ.
I understand it is preferable to a Catholic that one remain in his church. And looking at my original post, perhaps “be happy” is a little too strong language and subject to being misunderstood. Sometimes I do not use quite the words that I should to express my thoughts. That is why I am NotTooSmart.
But if one is in the state of mortal sin and going to hell as a Catholic and the state of their eternal soul changes from going to hell to having eternal life with Christ, I would think that the change in status of their eternal soul would be recognized as a good thing, while at the same time possibly believing that it would have been better if this change in state had happened in the Catholic church.
Now you are asking if I believe someone can be saved by obeying the rules and not believing. I said nothing like that. In fact, in your example the Catholic isn’t “obeying the rules”, is he? Catholics don’t believe that following the letter of the law will save anyone. Again, you misunderstand Catholicism. But it’s a common accusation against Catholics, so it’s understanable.
To clarify, I didn’t think that Catholics believed that following the letter of the saved anybody. But I was wondering aloud whether I misunderstood Catholicism on this point. I am glad to know that I did not. However, sometimes I read things here that make me wonder whether I am misunderstanding Catholicism on this very important point.
You are setting this up as if there are only two choices. Be a Catholic and not “know Jesus”, or belong to another Christian church and “know Jesus”. There is no reason to accept this premise.
Did I say that it is impossible to be a Catholic and know Jesus? Good grief, I thought I said the opposite.
The solution to not “knowing Jesus” is to attend Mass and attend to your spiritual life. Walking away is not the solution that the CC would rejoice over, and yet you say that Catholics “should”.
Actually the solution to mortal sin is going to confession, attending mass, and attending to your spiritual life. The solution to not knowing Jesus is to get to know Him.
As I said, my language was a shade to strong. You should not if you don’t want to “rejoice” over someone leaving your church. But I would think at least you should recognize that somebody having their eternal life destination changed from heading to hell to heading to heaven is a good thing.
I didn’t imply that it’s better to be a Catholic and not “know Jesus” than to be a non-Catholic and “know Jesus”. I don’t accept the premise you’ve set up for this debate in the first place. You have chosen to set it up as an either-or, and that is a false premise.
Then let me ask this way. Is it better to be Catholic and destined for hell or Protestant and destined for heaven…
I do not accept the claim that you’ve made (that a Catholic who misses Mass doesn’t know Jesus).You will have to prove that claim.
Well then if that claim is false, then you have the case of somebody who is going to hell knowing Christ. If that is possible in Catholicism then please explain because I have misunderstood you.
It would help if you define “know Jesus”.
I will be glad to. This phrase can be Protestant Christianese at times.
The theological term for this is “regeneration”. Regeneration is the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit in the heart of the believer. Catholics believe this happens at baptism. Us evangelicals often emphasize (perhaps a little too much) that this happens as a point in time experience. Irregardless of how this happens, the important point is that it must happen (and for those of you who are not eternally secure) remain current.
If you are regenerated, then you know Jesus.