R
royal_archer
Guest
Not everyone will be forced to buy insurance. Only those in the middle class and up.I have a totally different take on the issue; the real question underlying this one is: Do you think we, as a society are morally obliged to care for the sick?
If the answer is yes, then the question morality of being forced to purchase health care is moot. If the answer is no, why or why not?
With every right comes a responsibility and if I think (as our laws seem to) that a sick person has a right to be treated, then they also have a responsibility to contribute towards that care by purchasing insurance.
I see no loss of liberty here whatsoever. People act like they are going to be paying for someone else’s health care without any consideration for the fact that they are also going to get sick someday and need care.
How moral would it be for the government to allow people to opt out of health care, as in not requiring them to purchase insurance BUT instead requiring them to wear a tag that says: If I get sick, don’t care for me?
The only punitive aspects are for those who would have hoped to otherwise get a tax refund. There is no method of collection fro those who are not paying their fair share in taxes. This is purley a resource redistribution scheme.
Also, this is not about buying insurance, it is about being forced to buy the government premium plans. The administration now has the ability to put any and all types of new features into the plan under the overly loose umbrella of health care and we are forced to pay for it whether we want it or not. (those who refuse to work for a living are of coursed exempt.)
There is difference between emergency medical services required to stabilize someone and other non emergency costs. If someone refuses to pay, there is no reason the medical institution should be forced to keep giving them additional treatments for free. (we outlawed slavery nearly 150 years ago.