B
Bahman
Guest
How he could be God when he lose one important attribute so called omnipresent?No, you misunderstand. Jesus “took on flesh and dwelt among us” but he is still God.
How he could be God when he lose one important attribute so called omnipresent?No, you misunderstand. Jesus “took on flesh and dwelt among us” but he is still God.
God is God; he doesn’t need attributes. Just as you will always be you, regardless of your abilities or outward appearances. When Jesus became a helpless infant He didn’t lose His divinity, but He did give up His power, temporarily.How he could be God when he lose one important attribute so called omnipresent?
For a time, God chose to confine Himself to our limited nature. It was His choice. Can you possibly relate to someone who is omnipresent? Doubtful. We are very limited in our nature, and - naturally - we simply lack the power to understand existence without limits - omnipresence. We cannot understand it as our limits are, obviously, the barriers to that understanding. If we are to fully relate to Jesus, Jesus had to be fully one of us, it does not change the nature of God, merely the means through which we are able to relate to Him within His chosen human nature.How he could be God when he lose one important attribute so called omnipresent?
God is God; he doesn’t need attributes. Just as you will always be you, regardless of your abilities or outward appearances. When Jesus became a helpless infant He didn’t lose His divinity, but He did give up His power, temporarily.
God has attributes so called, omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent. And Jesus has a body now in Heaven? Hasn’t him?God is God; he doesn’t need attributes. Just as you will always be you, regardless of your abilities or outward appearances. When Jesus became a helpless infant He didn’t lose His divinity, but He did give up His power, temporarily.
It is in fact very simple to understand. You cannot be omnipresent when you have a body.For a time, God chose to confine Himself to our limited nature. It was His choice. Can you possibly relate to someone who is omnipresent? Doubtful. We are very limited in our nature, and - naturally - we simply lack the power to understand existence without limits - omnipresence. We cannot understand it as our limits are, obviously, the barriers to that understanding. If we are to fully relate to Jesus, Jesus had to be fully one of us, it does not change the nature of God, merely the means through which we are able to relate to Him within His chosen human nature.
Edit: You beat me to it, haha.
Jesus did not cease being God when he became man. He had both the nature of God and the nature of man, what Catholics call hypostatic union. I’m not a theologian so I doubt I can explain it to your satisfaction. You can read it in the Catechism or google it to find more articles about it.How he could be God when he lose one important attribute so called omnipresent?
Could God the Second Person of the Trinity CHOOSE not to be omnipresent while he had a body on earth?It is in fact very simple to understand. You cannot be omnipresent when you have a body.
This is what I mean when I say it is a limitation of our understanding. You’re imposing your own limitations upon God, within whom there exists no limitations. It’s natural to do this; we all do it. Because our understanding has limits upon it, we can only form ideas of something limitless that is confined within our own limitations.It is in fact very simple to understand. You cannot be omnipresent when you have a body.
God has spoken out to you because He loves you beyond measure. However, He uses all the beautiful colors of the rainbow in His master piece mural of salvation. And what stroke do we represent? Well, how many of us love all of God’s children as though Jesus suffered and died so that we would? While we call out to him “Just speak out!”, he in his infinite wisdom and love calls to us in His crucifixion bearing our punishment for our sins, “Just love!”.Why God who is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent should need a messenger to tell the truth? Just speak out!
You said it much, much better than I did. Thank you.Could God the Second Person of the Trinity CHOOSE not to be omnipresent while he had a body on earth?
That need not mean God by nature is not omnipresent or was not when Jesus walked the earth.
It also does not mean God the Son could not be omnipresent and have a fully glorified human body. God is, after all, eternal; which means he is not restricted by time. He is outside of any temporal or physical restrictions whatsoever.
Yet, you keep wanting to set temporal and physical limitations on God as if you fully comprehend what it means to be God in the first place.
You seem to have all kinds of ideas about what God could or could not do. Why is God restricted by your notions about God as if your opinions are the final say on the matter?
You cannot be omnipresent when you have a body.It is in fact very simple to understand. You cannot be omnipresent when you have a body.
:tiphat:You said it much, much better than I did. Thank you.
God is God regardless of attributes.God has attributes so called, omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent. And Jesus has a body now in Heaven? Hasn’t him?
I think to be fair we’ll have to give Bahman 1/2 a point for this. The catechism paragraph [476](javascriptYou cannot be omnipresent when you have a body.
Let’s call this Bahman’s First Rule of Omnipresence.
It is very simple to understand.
Bahman would know what omnipresence entails and what is possible for God because…
…
Well… okay… the “rule” is not really a rule, after all.
A “guess,” more like.
Well… alright… sheer ungrounded conjecture.
A “stab in the dark,” really.
This fact did not rob him of his divinity, however.I think to be fair we’ll have to give Bahman 1/2 a point for this. The catechism paragraph [476](javascriptpenWindow(‘cr/476.htm’)
says “Since the Word became flesh in assuming a true humanity, Christ’s body was finite.” I’ll go out on a limb and say that probably during his time on earth he didn’t bilocate.
![]()
I know, that’s the part Bahman apparently doesn’t get.This fact did not rob him of his divinity, however.
No.God isn’t hiding - it is we who are blind and deaf, and cannot see or hear Him - this comes about because of the sins of our ancestor Adam, who damaged the Creation in some fundamental way because of his disobedience, and hid himself from God out of shame. Thus, God comes to us through messengers, rather than directly.
I am surprised at the comments that you made and would like to encourage a Bible study, to talk to a priest or watch EWTN Catechism. 1) Jesus saved everyone who believed or was waiting for the Christ but had already died but never knew the good news. 2) The Catechism of the Church teaches that God’s grace is so bountiful that a baby who dies at birth will still go to heaven 3) The Catechism of the Church teaches that if someone never hears of Jesus they may still go to heavenNo.
If a new born baby dies at birth, said baby will have never heard the good news.
If a boy was born in India, raised as a Hindu and dies as a devout Hindu, he will have never heard the good news.
If a girl was raised as an Atheist and died before hearing the good news…
Gods master plan is positively weak at spreading the word to all of humanity.
In my examples, no one was blind, rather Gods message failed to reach them.
I am not sure because it is like giving up his divinity since you cannot be omnipresent while you have a body, whether earthy or glorified.Could God the Second Person of the Trinity CHOOSE not to be omnipresent while he had a body on earth?
You cannot by nature be omnipresent and has a body.That need not mean God by nature is not omnipresent or was not when Jesus walked the earth.
He of course had temporal and physical restriction otherwise he could not be crucified.It also does not mean God the Son could not be omnipresent and have a fully glorified human body. God is, after all, eternal; which means he is not restricted by time. He is outside of any temporal or physical restrictions whatsoever.
.Yet, you keep wanting to set temporal and physical limitations on God as if you fully comprehend what it means to be God in the first place.
Because of simple reason, you cannot be omnipresent and embedded into a body at the same time.You seem to have all kinds of ideas about what God could or could not do. Why is God restricted by your notions about God as if your opinions are the final say on the matter?