Martin,
. I fully agree that He Who says “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No man cometh to the Father but by Me.” is speaking the truth. But I see Him as being the One Who sends all of the Prophets. No man can come to God but through His Manifestations.
. Yet from my perspective, there remains no contradiction. I realize that may be difficult to understand, accept, or even contemplate. I came from a pretty similar background as yourself. Although not raised Catholic, but Methodist, we have very similar essential backgrounds.
. The man objections to Muhammad from Christians seem to lie in His assertion that
- Allah alone is God, and that all Those Whom He sent, including Jesus, were Messengers of God, which is affirmed by Jesus’ own words:
. “These are not My words, but Him that sent Me.”
. No need to go around on the Trinity thing on this thread, I think we all understand the generally accepted assertion that Jesus was God incarnate from the Christian perspective. Just wanting to note that difference as one of the primaries.
- The matter of the crucifixion, where certain translations of the Quran “appear” to deny that Christ was crucified, whereas in reality the rational understanding is that while the body and physical Person of Jesus was truly crucified, the One Who said “Before Abraham was, I am”, could never be put on a cross. How can you truthfully crucify “I am”? It cannot be done.
- The violent defense of Islam during the lifetime and after the death of the Prophet Muhammad. Where is the justification of this in contrast to Jesus teachings of turn the other cheek, etc?
. As the last question appears so persistently in today’s climate, it helps to view it honestly in light of the numerous Holy Wars of the Old Testament, under David, etc, as well as the thousands of years of justified Holy Wars under Christendom.
. When the US and its allies go to war, in all of its history, the Name of God has been invoked. Whether fighting the British (who were also Christian), or the German Nazis (also Christian), to nuking the Japanese (mostly Shinto and Buddhist) and bombing Iraq and Afghanistan (mostly Muslims), or slaughtering all those Indians (who weren’t really Hindus) from the Atlantic to the Pacific and everywhere in between.
. Therefore, to dismiss any validity of Muslims slaying the infidels, saying: “You can’t do that!” must mean that there are no enemies so vile that one cannot defend themselves against by means of warfare. This assertion clearly leads to a double standard, for by whatever name, the enemy is always the infidel, heathen, commies, gooks, redskins, or whatever word allows us to dehumanize some portion of humanity and permit us to start pulling triggers and unleashing “the wrath of God” upon “them”.
. “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.” Jesus Matthew 10:34