Why is it wrong to love Mary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy_B
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Can I just point something out… This is not meant as an attack at all, just an FYI.

Your posts say something entirely different than your last couple of posts to me. You do not show unconditional love nor do you show a willingness to do anything but chastize and hammer on protestants and anyone you consider your enemy (when it comes to Mary especially).

Your ‘love’ does not show at all.

It’s something to chew on…
I knew you were “reaching” for something and I was ready for it.

Jesus chastized and hammered The Pharisees, but He loved them too.

Love doesn’t mean that I have to agree 101% with the person.

I don’t have to hold hands and sing Kumbaya with someone to love them.

Love doesnt’ mean that I allow someone to lie about my Church or to disrespect The Holy Mother of God without my defending her.

I can correct a person and completely discredit their lies and still love them.

😃
 
I knew you were “reaching” for something and I was ready for it.

Jesus chastized and hammered The Pharisees, but He loved them too.

Love doesn’t mean that I have to agree 101% with the person.

I don’t have to hold hands and sing Kumbaya with someone to love them.

Love doesnt’ mean that I allow someone to lie about my Church or to disrespect The Holy Mother of God without my defending her.

I can correct a person and completely discredit their lies and still love them.

😃
I wasn’t trying to ‘reach’ for anything. There was no trap or hidden agenda. It was only after your statements that I thought I would gently show you that your comments, while probably meant in love, don’t show it at all.

When Jesus chastized someone, He did it in love. When the woman was found as an adultress, He stopped the stoning and told her to go sin no more. From your posts, you seem to throw the stones left and right. You are so zealous to show you are right that even when proven wrong you stick to your ‘smoking’ guns and refuse to admit wrong.

Even here, I say your posts don’t seem like you love everyone and instead of apologizing for how you represented yourself to lead me to believe this, you defend it and talk about how you have a right to show everyone that they are wrong and you are right. 🤷

You don’t have to agree, but you can’t hate and love someone at the same time. You have chosen hate (from what your posts show).

You post vulgar and VERY inappropriate content from YouTube and yet you even defend this instead of apologizing. You attack protestants and make blanket statements about what protestants feel instead of asking us what we believe.

Like I said, something to chew on.

See, I can disagree and point out wrong but I can still portray the love of Christ at the same time.

But ultimately it is between you and God. Hopefully He can soften your heart and show you how wrong you are about us…
 
When he says “special powers” He’s refering to Mary’s abilty to intercede and despence graces. Her position as the Queen of Heaven and Earth entitles her to abilties beyond that of the other saints, and authority surpassed only by the trinity.
The Catholic gave this “Queen of Heaven and Earth” title to Mary. There is no reference in the bible that Mary was given any special priveleges or title, and also ‘special powers’.
After the Pentecost, there are no other mention of Mary in the bible. Although, the Apostle John cared for Mary, John never mentioned her in his Gospel. If Mary, being the mother of Jesus, why would John not write about Mary and her ‘role’?
 
The Catholic gave this “Queen of Heaven and Earth” title to Mary. There is no reference in the bible that Mary was given any special priveleges or title, and also ‘special powers’.
After the Pentecost, there are no other mention of Mary in the bible. Although, the Apostle John cared for Mary, John never mentioned her in his Gospel. If Mary, being the mother of Jesus, why would John not write about Mary and her ‘role’?
God gave Mary her title.

John did write about her. In revelation. (beating a dead horse)
 
40.png
guanophore:
If we are truly His brethren by faith, how can we not also be grafted into His own mother?
I am not grafted into Jesus mother. I am grafted to the vine, which is Jesus.

[Jhn 15:1] “I am the true vine, and my Father is the gardener.
[Jhn 15:2] He cuts off every branch in me that bears no fruit, while every branch that does bear fruit he prunes so that it will be even more fruitful.
[Jhn 15:4] Remain in me, and I will remain in you. No branch can bear fruit by itself; it must remain in the vine. Neither can you bear fruit unless you remain in me.
[Jhn 15:5] “I am the vine; you are the branches. If a man remains in me and I in him, he will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing.
 
SingingBeauty…

Wow…if you could only live out what you stated on your own forum about not harrassing people and about people being able to speak their minds on any subject or about badgering people for defending their faiths.

You even go as far to insist that one could speak their mind as long as it deals with the “OP” (original post).

Over there, you say that without over moderation, one can speak their piece about religions and denominations around them…I guess that doesn’t apply to me, huh?

It looks like you live by two standards. One you impose on others when “you’re” in control, and one you dish out on “other christian forums”.

Can I have your permision to re-post your exact words on this forum from your own forum so that “this” board and compare what you insist on in your forum and what you practice in ours?
 
SingingBeauty…

Wow…if you could only live out what you stated on your own forum about not harrassing people and about people being able to speak their minds on any subject or about badgering people for defending their faiths.

You even go as far to insist that one could speak their mind as long as it deals with the “OP” (original post).

Over there, you say that without over moderation, one can speak their piece about religions and denominations around them…I guess that doesn’t apply to me, huh?

It looks like you live by two standards. One you impose on others when “you’re” in control, and one you dish out on “other christian forums”.

Can I have your permision to re-post your exact words on this forum from your own forum so that “this” board and compare what you insist on in your forum and what you practice in ours?
Since this is growing bigger than intended, no, you cannot re-post my words. They can go to the forum to find out for themselves.

I will point out, however, that I never said you can’t speak your piece - just be careful in how you speak it. We are called to be Christ Like, which means to do anything and everything as Christ would. I have spoken my piece and will leave it at that.

Sorry Jimmy B, the hyjacking of the thread was not intentional.
 
How do you read

Luke 1:43
"And how has it happened to me, that the mother of my Lord would come to me?

and

Revelation 12:17
“So the dragon was enraged with the woman,
and went off to make war with the rest of her children,
who keep the commandments of God and hold to the testimony of Jesus.”

🙂
Well Mary is the mother or Jesus

And the woman in Revelation doesn’t necessarily refer to Mary …

Why did you focus on the two differences I made and not on the rest of my message ???
to see what we have in common rather than accentuate our differences …( but neither can we ignore them … )
 
area52;3252242:
Where does it state that she “needed” a saviour?
Read Luke1:46-55. I only listed 2 verses.
[Luk 1:46] And Mary said: “My soul glorifies the Lord
[Luk 1:47] and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior

If Mary is sinless, she would not have stated “my Savior”

The hebrew word for savior is σωτήρ, meaning “a deliverer, that is, God or Christ: - saviour”
It states that she was “saved” before Jesus was born
You are correct that Mary was saved before Jesus was even born. Mary “obtained grace from God,” and was made the mother of God because she heard the word of God spoken by the angel Gabriel and believed it and acted according to it. It was thus not her inherent worth, but the grace of God bestowed upon her and the resulting faith that came from hearing God’s word to her that she became blessed.
therefore, since it wasn’t Jesus’ death that saved Mary, Mary was formed in the womb (as God forms all of us in the womb) sinless
.

Mary was not sinless. If you say that she was sinless, you have to also say that Mary’s mother who boure Mary in her womb must also be sinless, and so on to Mary’s mother’s mother…
It is impossible to be sinful “and” full of God’s favor at the same time.
Nothing is impossible to God. Even if a sinner to boure the Savior in her womb.

[Luk 1:37] For with God nothing shall be impossible.
Did Mary suffer however? Yes, she gave up her only Son to the world. All she had to do was to say “no” to God when she was presented with the opportunity to bring forth The Saviour of mankind…her Son.
If Mary had said ‘no’, God would still have sent Jesus to become flesh to another woman. For nothing is impossible with God (Luk1:37). But God knowing full well her answer, ‘favor’ Mary.
Jesus Christ was created
from Mary’s flesh and bones (and no man contributed to His creation). The very blood that Jesus shed came from no man, but only from one living creature…Mary.

Jesus was never created. Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit.
Revelations 12…after the persecution of Christians, she was given two wings and assumpted into heaven.
The ‘woman’ is the church if you read commentaries on Revelation 12.
Matthew 12:
46While he yet talked to the people, behold, his mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him.
47Then one said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with thee.
48But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren?
49And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples
, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!

50For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.

In verse 49, Jesus was pointing his hand ‘toward’ the disciples who had believe in Him. Because of their belief in Jesus as the Messiah, He call them ‘my mother and my brethren’.

Jesus did not single out His mother or disrespect her. In verse 50, Jesus said that ‘whoever does the will of my Father’ is my brother and sister and mother.”
He’s never
rebuked His mother…not only would this be disrespectful to do, but He’d be breaking The Commandment that dictates that He “honor” His mother.

I agree
Where do you see Him dishonoring His mother there?
Having Mary as the center of your faith, dishonor Jesus and God.
 
jerusalem was good enough for jesus. but its not good enough for catholics. they had to go to rome instead. the point is, there are many things that are good enough for jesus but wasnt meant for everybody else. She didnt even call Mary “Mother”. For Jesus “Woman” is a good enough reference for Mary. So is that good enough for you as well? “Holy Woman, pray for us sinners”.

Well not theologically. But in practice it does happen a lot. It happened for me when I was a Catholic. And its happening for 2ndGen right here. Look what he/she’s been posting man!
Agnos T,

Jesus and his Mother

At the foot of the Cross, Jesus commissioned His mother to be the Mother of all Christians, and by giving her to John who personifies the Christian people, He commands us to accept her as our own Mother , the new Eve and spiritual **Mother ** of all the faithful, of whom the beloved disciple is the type and representative.

Please Read John 19, 25-27 I really want you to think about what Jesus is saying. Take your time and ponder…Ok, when you are ready, give me your interpretation ?

Near the cross of Jesus stood his Mother and his **Mothers’s ** sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary of Magdala. Seeing his Mother, and the disciple whom he loved standing near her, Jesus said to his Mother, ‘Woman, this is your son,’ Then to the disciple , **Jesus ** said, , This is your Mother.

.
 
Since this is growing bigger than intended, no, you cannot re-post my words. They can go to the forum to find out for themselves.

I will point out, however, that I never said you can’t speak your piece - just be careful in how you speak it. We are called to be Christ Like, which means to do anything and everything as Christ would. I have spoken my piece and will leave it at that.

Sorry Jimmy B, the hyjacking of the thread was not intentional.

I attempted to answer your private note to me, but for some reason it states “improper username” when I tried to reply, so I’ll post my response here (without posting what you wrote to me):​

[2ndGen to SingingBeauty]

You don’t even know how to correct someone in charity. You’re first supposed to do it (not in public), privately.

Matthew 18:15
“And if thy brother sin against thee,
go, show him his fault between thee and him alone:
if he hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.”

I think you should spend less time trying to correct people and more time reading The Holy Bible.

By the way…read post #6 that I wrote days ago “before” you chose to address me as you did on the thread on why it was wrong to love Mary.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=214603

I was referring to YOU when I said this…
There is one poster here who is one of those “true” Christians I spoke of and “she” knows who she is. Hugs and kisses for her.
So…you are the one who needs to really check yourself “before” you feel justified in bringing anybody’s words to “light”.
 
Well Mary is the mother or Jesus

And the woman in Revelation doesn’t necessarily refer to Mary …

Why did you focus on the two differences I made and not on the rest of my message ???
to see what we have in common rather than accentuate our differences …( but neither can we ignore them … )
But Jesus wasn’t born yet and Elisabeth didn’t know about Jesus and up until that point, only God was referred to as “Lord”.

As for Mary being the woman in Revelation 12 (which is the woman that gave birth to Jesus and you yourself said that Mary was His mother), check this out for undenyable scriptural evidence:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=215081

(Oh, and if it’s not Mary, who is it then? Jeruselum? Jeruselum is called “barron” can cannot produce offspring. The Church? Which one of the 33,001 Christian churces? The Church that existed the earliest? That created The Holy Bible? That “Church”?)
 
2ndGen;3252333:
area52;3252242:
Read Luke1:46-55. I only listed 2 verses.
[Luk 1:46] And Mary said: “My soul glorifies the Lord
[Luk 1:47] and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior
If Mary is sinless, she would not have stated “my Savior”

You walked right into that one! LOL!

Mary NEVER stated “when” she was saved.

Can you? At birth? At 12 years old? When?

Can you provide any evidence that she “wasn’t” saved before she was born? Scriptural evidence?

She was “formed” sinless. She was saved by God “before” she was born. Don’t you know of the Prophecy of Jesus being born of a virgin from the house of David? It was referring specifically “to” Mary. God had her in His mind since Genesis 3.

Also, notice, she calls “God” her saviour, not God The Son, but God period…that means it included God The Father, God The Son and God The Holy Spirit (all three) so she was saved while all three were one uniformally…this shows it “had to” be “before” Jesus was even conceived in Mary’s womb.

She couldn’t be full of grace and have been a sinner simultaneously…impossible. Sinners aren’t saved. Those made sinless by the sacrifice of Jesus could be saved, but not someone who came “before” Jesus’ sacrifice.
You are correct that Mary was saved before Jesus was even born. Mary “obtained grace from God,” and was made the mother of God because she heard the word
of God spoken by the angel Gabriel and believed it and acted according to it. It was thus not her inherent worth, but the grace of God bestowed upon her and the resulting faith that came from hearing God’s word to her that she became blessed.

When? When she said obeyed God? Or was it before she was born? Do you believe that God would form the flesh of His Son on earth out of sinful flesh?

God would start with pure flesh, not with recycled flesh!
Mary was not sinless. If you say that she was sinless, you have to also say that Mary’s mother who boure Mary in her womb must also be sinless, and so on to Mary’s mother’s mother…
Jesus was formed sinless in Mary’s womb.

See that? By your own reasoning, you just proved that Mary is sinless because Jesus was.

👍
Nothing is impossible to God. Even if a sinner to boure the Savior in her womb.
You’re right…if God wanted to create His Son of the purest flesh He ever formed in the womb of any woman (namely Saint Ann), He could make Mary sinless.

Are you saying it’s impossible for God to have done so?

Does the Bible state that Mary was born a sinner (and don’t even think if using the “all have sinned” verse, because that would condemn Jesus as He was born of a woman)?
If Mary had said ‘no’, God would still have sent Jesus to become flesh to another woman. For nothing is impossible with God (Luk1:37). But God knowing full well her answer, ‘favor’ Mary.
So then, according to you, there was no prophecy that Jesus was to be born of a certain woman at a certain time in history from a certain line (The Davidic Line)?
Jesus was never created. Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit.
Same thing:

dictionary.reference.com/browse/create

Main Entry: create
Part of Speech: verb
Definition: develop
Synonyms: actualize, author, beget, build, coin, compose, conceive, concoct, constitute, construct, contrive, design, devise, discover, dream up, effect, erect, establish, fabricate, fashion, father, forge, form, formulate, found, generate, hatch, imagine, initiate, institute, invent, invest, make, occasion, organize, originate, parent, perform, plan, procreate, produce, rear, set up, shape, sire, spawn, start
The ‘woman’ is the church if you read commentaries on Revelation 12.
Commentaries? Of who? Of men? What does The Scripture say she is?

Here’s your answer:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=3254493#post3254493
In verse 49, Jesus was pointing his hand ‘toward’ the disciples who had believe in Him. Because of their belief
in Jesus as the Messiah, He call them ‘my mother and my brethren’.

Right, but that isnt’ the “end” of the passage. That is a one verse of it.

And who was THE FIRST one to believe in Jesus?
Who was the first Believer?
Who “knew” Jesus before anyone of us?

Some Christians brag about having Jesus, but in reality, only one woman really “had” Jesus…and that was His mother Mary.

I mean, she literally had Jesus “in” her.

If some think that they are blessed because they have an allegorical relationship with Him, imagine how much more blessed Mary was for having a “real” relationship with Him…Oh wait, that’s right, she’s called “blessed among alllllll women.”

You are so making my points for me.
Jesus did not single out His mother or disrespect her. In verse 50, Jesus said that 'whoever does the will of my Father’
is my brother and sister and mother.”

Correct me if I’m wrong, but did you say that Jesus denied His own mother?

That to me is a serious offense against the commandment that we are to “honor” our mothers.
Having Mary as the center of your faith, dishonor Jesus and God.
Or course. But that only applies to those who have her as the center of their faith and not to Catholics. I’m sure there has to be some non-Catholic sect that literally worships Mary out there.

There are some that use snakes to worship God, so why not some who worship Mary too?
 
I’m not aware of any place in scripture where Mary is said to be the mother of believers in Christ. Would you happen to have passage or verse what makes you think this?
It happens in the same way that Rufus’ mother is also a mother to Paul:

13 Greet Rufus, chosen in the Lord, and his mother, who has been a mother to me, too. Rom 16:13-14
 
Yes. However who can do such a thing? All men fall short of this standard and that’w why we need a Savior.
We can do all things, through Christ, who strengthens us.
Quick answer before we get caught since its such a good question. What man can follow the commandments perfectly and gain eternal life? This is impossible.
Jesus never commands the impossible.
That’s why when a man is confronted with the “bad news” that he can’t keep the law he will either despair or see his need for a Savior (good news).
Catholics have a much larger view of salvation. Catholics believe we are saved so that we can love perfectly.
 
Only Mary could have wailed so much in pain that it required special mention in Scripture as she was a “virgin” when she had Jesus (imagine how painful it is to give birth to a child…now, imagine how much more painful it must be for a woman that’s never had a man in her life).
I am not so sure this is what her pain was. It has been said that she did not suffer the consequence of original sin, having been preserved from it. Therefore, she had no pain in childbearing. Also, it is written that she retained her virgin state after the birth, the Christ passing through her without violation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top