C
cynic
Guest
well I’ll put it more clearly : is it moral to drink in order to feel ‘relaxed’
Thank you! that’s a lot clearer. Maybe I can be clearer too now. As long as your idea of ‘relaxed’ doesn’t include any noticeable impairment of mental or physical faculties then it’s OK morally.well I’ll put it more clearly : is it moral to drink in order to feel ‘relaxed’
You kno when Jesus came to be, de pple of de world did not accept hiz Greatness thus hiz work waz labelled Immoral.Dats simply de same with Ganja - pple hve not yet discovered its Greatness !!!..OUTTA!My sister has just informed me that she see’s no problem with marijuana use. She said it is the same as alcohol. But I think that it is immoral but would like to know if anyone could explain the morality to me, so I can understand it better.
then one beer is one too many. Any amount of alcohol impares, that’s why the blood alcohol limit for driving is so low.Thank you! that’s a lot clearer. Maybe I can be clearer too now. As long as your idea of ‘relaxed’ doesn’t include any noticeable impairment of mental or physical faculties then it’s OK morally.
I said NOTICEABLE impairment - such as, for example, the level that impairs driving. Blood alcohol limit for driving is LOW, but it’s not ZILCH. Here in Australia the limit is 0.05% blood alcohol. One beer almost certainly would not put you over, even one beer an hour is unlikely to (unless you’re small or haven’t eaten or something).then one beer is one too many. Any amount of alcohol impares, that’s why the blood alcohol limit for driving is so low.
It’s silly to say that it’s impossible to get buzzed off of marijuana. I can easily take two or three hits off of a bowl and feel relaxed. I can still articulate my thoughts clearly and I don’t turn into some bumbling idiot that you seem to think all weed smokers are.Now part of the problem with your question may stem from the use of the word ‘buzz’. It’s a little tricky for me to compare the effects of alcohol with those of marijuana, which I have never had.
It doesn’t appear to me though that you can predictably consume marijuana at a level that will purely relax you without you getting ‘buzzed’ ‘stoned’ or whatever your favourite word is, in other words impaired mentally. This is unlike alcohol, where you can fairly predictably drink without getting tipsy in the slightest. For this reason alone I would don’t see that anyone could ever consume marijuana and say ‘I 90% certainly won’t get stoned’. It’s that sort of unpredictability about marijuana’s effects that makes me doubt that it could ever be moral to consume it.
This is a ridiculous stance to take. Cannabis isn’t anywhere close to tobacco - which is “associated with coronary heart disease, stroke, ulcers, respiratory infections, lung cancer (as well as cancer of the larynx, esophagus, bladder, pancreas, stomach, & uterine cervix), bronchitis, emphysema, early menopause, and stillborn & premature children (NIDA, 1999).”. Oh, and this little thing called addiction.No more harm than caffeine? Really? When was the last time you heard of someone having a full-blown psychotic episode after drinking too much of Starbucks’ finest? No more harm than alcohol? Why isn’t there a legal amount of THC permitted to be in the blood before you can drive then? No more harmful than tobacco? You seen the massive amounts of money tobacco companies have had to pay out to people killed by cancer and other diseases because of their product? Cannabis causes exactly the same types of damage as tobacco and more.
I’m not talking about using drugs to the point of being a ‘bumbling idiot’ at all, but perhaps beyond the point of impairment. For example, where a person could responsibly drive. You must know there’s a massive difference between FEELING impaired and actually being impaired. I don’t think it’s impossible to be unimpaired by marijuana, I do feel it’s more difficult and the effects of marijuana are less predictable than with alcohol. There needs to be a lot more study done into the effects of marijuana on fine motor skills and such.It’s silly to say that it’s impossible to get buzzed off of marijuana. I can easily take two or three hits off of a bowl and feel relaxed. I can still articulate my thoughts clearly and I don’t turn into some bumbling idiot that you seem to think all weed smokers are.
Addiction? I don’t know exactly HOW addictive cannabis is in comparison to other drugs. I don’t think it’s completely unaddictive though.Cannabis isn’t anywhere close to tobacco - which is “associated with coronary heart disease, stroke, ulcers, respiratory infections, lung cancer (as well as cancer of the larynx, esophagus, bladder, pancreas, stomach, & uterine cervix), bronchitis, emphysema, early menopause, and stillborn & premature children (NIDA, 1999).”. Oh, and this little thing called addiction.![]()
No tobacco isn’t used medicinally, but caffeine has actually been used in the past in medical treatment, so has alcohol (hence the expression ‘a medicinal brandy’)I’m pretty sure there’s a reason why we have medical marijuana not medical caffeine, tobacco or alcohol.
No condescenscion taken. Never used marijuana myself, but I have plenty of family and friends who have in varying degrees, as well as half-a-dozen family members who are doctors so I’m not completely ignorant. My sister worked for quite a while in emergency medicine - perhaps because she DID see the horror cases and told me about them that coloured my perceptions somewhat.Hopefully i’m not coming off as condescending - there is a lot of propaganda out there about marijauana and you really have no first hand experience so who can blame you for your opinion?
I don’t think that’s accurate in the case of Marijuana, it was legal, but the “evidence” for why it should be banned was psuedo science hysteria"Remember that all the currently illegal drugs have actually been legal at some point - in some cases for quite a long time. If they were banned it’s usually because there’s a reasonable amount of evidence accumulated that they are in fact harmful.
I can’t name any studies off the top of my head but it’s my own personal experience that people high on marijuana are safer drivers then drunks. I would MUCH rather get in a car with someone high driving then a drunk. But then again if it was possible I would do neither.I’m not talking about using drugs to the point of being a ‘bumbling idiot’ at all, but perhaps beyond the point of impairment. For example, where a person could responsibly drive. You must know there’s a massive difference between FEELING impaired and actually being impaired. I don’t think it’s impossible to be unimpaired by marijuana, I do feel it’s more difficult and the effects of marijuana are less predictable than with alcohol. There needs to be a lot more study done into the effects of marijuana on fine motor skills and such.
That’s exactly what i’m saying because guess what? Marijuana is NOT addictive. Studies have shown and it’s a widely recognized fact - even by gasp doctors.Addiction? You saying cannabis isn’t addictive? It most certainly is - perhaps not as addictive as tobacco or some other drugs. Heavy users certainly have problems quitting even when they want to - I know, I’ve seen them try and fail. I think that qualifies as addiction. I’m not saying it’s AS bad as tobacco, but users do develop quite a lot of the same health problems.
It’s not that simple. The problem with marijuana, and a major hurdle the legalization movement has to face IS testing. With marijuana you can’t just breath into a breathalyzer or even use an on the spot blood or piss test.Have you ever wondered why marijuana ISN’T treated the same as alcohol? It’d be easy enough to enact a law saying ‘x amount of THC in the blood is fine and you’re ok to drive with it, if you’re above then it’s impairing your driving and it’s illegal’. Remember that all the currently illegal drugs have actually been legal at some point - in some cases for quite a long time. If they were banned it’s usually because there’s a reasonable amount of evidence accumulated that they are in fact harmful. If anything, the currently legal drugs of alcohol and tobacco should probably also be more stringently policed and restricted as well.
Ok, we can argue about exactly how harmful it is, and how it compares to alcohol and other drugs, can we agree that at least at some levels of use it’s harmful.I don’t think that’s accurate in the case of Marijuana, it was legal, but the “evidence” for why it should be banned was psuedo science hysteria"
wine being beneficial to your health, or even “having drinks” being beneficial to your health does not demonstrate that alcohol itself his beneficial. better research needs to rule out effects of grapes ect in the first example, and effects of an active social life in the second.If it could further be shown that small amounts of marijuana are in fact beneficial to health, as has been shown with wine and even caffeine, then I’d completely revise my opinion of it entirely.
As it has been pointed out by other posters, it’s just extreme paranoia. You just tell them to chill out and sit down and they mellow out within a short time as long as you keep calm.No more harm than caffeine? Really? When was the last time you heard of someone having a full-blown psychotic episode after drinking too much of Starbucks’ finest?
Because most people who smoke weed that get into a car afterwards don’t drive like a bat out of hades, bobbin’ & weavin’; most people driving that are high drive right at the speed limit or lower and act like they just read the DMV manual for driving. How many wrecks do you hear about people who are high get in vs people who are drunk?No more harm than alcohol? Why isn’t there a legal amount of THC permitted to be in the blood before you can drive then? No more harmful than tobacco?
What are the other damages you are referring too?You seen the massive amounts of money tobacco companies have had to pay out to people killed by cancer and other diseases because of their product? Cannabis causes exactly the same types of damage as tobacco and more.
Exactly - so both are impairing, yes? And therefore immoral if used at a level that impairs, yes? The quesiton is what level of marijuana use impairs - I wouldn’t say that any consumption at all impairs, but (perhaps mistakenly) I feel it’s easier to get to that level with marijuana than alcohol.I can’t name any studies off the top of my head but it’s my own personal experience that people high on marijuana are safer drivers then drunks. I would MUCH rather get in a car with someone high driving then a drunk. But then again if it was possible I would do neither.
Am I missing something - is THC not the active ingredient? Is it not the stuff in the marijuana that actually does get you high? Of course it’s like alcohol where you need a certain level to be unfit (for example) to drive, so I freely accept that after a number of hours the level will be low enough that you’ll basically be sober.The problem is that THC is stored in fat, which is why depending on your body weight and how active you are it can be detectable for up to 3-4 weeks after smoking. Now don’t misunderstand this as meaning that someone is going to be high for 3-4 weeks - 2 or 3 hours after smoking (possibly longer if eaten) the person will be perfectly sober.
Well I’m certainly learning, which is always goodHope I shed some light on the issue for you.
Yeah, both are impairing. The problem with marijuana detection is that there really is no foolproof detection method. Someone could’ve smoked earlier in the morning and if he was later tested that night he would still have high THC levels. Does that mean he is still high? Not at all.Exactly - so both are impairing, yes? And therefore immoral if used at a level that impairs, yes? The quesiton is what level of marijuana use impairs - I wouldn’t say that any consumption at all impairs, but (perhaps mistakenly) I feel it’s easier to get to that level with marijuana than alcohol.
Expanding on what I was just talking about, I really wish I had the knowledge to break it down for you on how THC reacts with your body on a chemical level but sadly I was never very good at chemistryAm I missing something - is THC not the active ingredient? Is it not the stuff in the marijuana that actually does get you high? Of course it’s like alcohol where you need a certain level to be unfit (for example) to drive, so I freely accept that after a number of hours the level will be low enough that you’ll basically be sober.
I agree about the social life bit, but a good study will find ways to rule out variables like that. Otherwise, the grapes are an essential part of the wine (or whatever other ingredient in other alcoholic drinks does the trick). The effects don’t appear to be repeatable with, say, grape juice or non-alcoholic drinks, othwerwise we’d be encouraged to give those to our children.wine being beneficial to your health, or even “having drinks” being beneficial to your health does not demonstrate that alcohol itself his beneficial. better research needs to rule out effects of grapes ect in the first example, and effects of an active social life in the second.
Uh huh. Yes cannabis consumption is legal there, so’s euthanasia, abortion and gay marriage … so’s getting completely and utterly fall-down drunk for that matter … are you suggesting all of those are morally fine as well?You should fly to Amsterdam and smoke some weed, i think it would help you get a better handle on the topic.