Because adoption has such ugly mythology attached “they can come and take your baby BACK”, that kids older than infants “are dangerous”, since private adoption is a luxury expense item it is beyond means for many people, people often think adopting from foster means you are getting kids who are less than.
TRAGIC.
But “they can come and take your child back” ISN’T a myth my dear. I know someone it happened to three times! It’s something anyone exiting the painful world of infertility and moving toward the hopeful world of adoption needs to contend with because it can and does happen, and it’s a death. The people who go through it deal with a huge load of disenfranchised grief on top of the disenfranchised grief of whatever brought them to adoption in the first place. (Unless they just have a heart to adopt with is a completely different situation.)
The idea that “foster children” are “less than” isn’t just insulting to “foster children” but to couples who decide against adopting those kids. When a couple is looking at adoption they need to consider, very carefully, what sort of challenges they are able to take on. Do they have the patience, skills and support to raise a child that comes with challenges like drug addiction? Violent histories? Abuse? Unknown medical needs? Abandonment issues? If the adoption is open are the parents ready and willing to take on a whole extended family? Do they have the strength of character to set boundaries if that extended family turns out to be toxic? If the potential child is of a different race will they face racism in the potential parent’s extended family? Community?
Yes, these are ugly questions. But it is uglier to close our eyes to the issue and do it anyway so we can fill a hole in our heart. It is worse for the child to go to parents who are lying to themselves. And it is terrible to assume the couples who forego foster adoption do it because those kids are “less than.”
Adoptive parents need to make sure that they are adopting a child for the correct reason. Is it to fill a hole in themselves? Their marriage? Or is it because they want to love and foster another human being? Can they go into it completely selflessly? Can they love this tiny person unconditionally no matter what comes? Is there any spec of regret, remorse, resentment at the idea of adoption? If there is, adoption is a no-go. But it isn’t because anyone is “less than.” It’s because it’s not a correct fit yet.
How do I know? Because I’ve lived this experience and, full disclosure, I am without children. Why? Because not adopting was the right choice for me, my spouse, the possible future child we did not adopt, and the actual adoptive parents of the child whom we did not adopt. Believe me, coming to the conclusion that we should not adopt was excruciating. And while it may seem selfish, it was actually selfless.
I don’t expect others to understand that, but am thankful to anyone who tries.