I have one concern: with such a personalized Religion that “fits every person”, when I find my personal Religion, does this Religion really tell me anything about God or does it just reflect my own preconceived ideas, my own biases and my own weaknesses?
Also, how far would you take this idea? Do you include Buddhism in this picture of Religion as well? What about atheists that after an honest search for Religion decides that atheism is their fitting “Religion” so to speak? (And I assume here that atheists can also be kind towards other people and live a life of love towards other people.)
I wrote about a religion that you can live with, whose values and beliefs are in accord with your life experience, which gives you comfort now, and which allows you to grow in faith.
I have found that the Catholic Church has done - is doing - that for me. The belief or value system (Buddhism, again, does not have a divinity, and I think ‘religion’ must be defined in terms of a deity) you choose will not reflect your own preconceived ideas, biases or weaknesses, but will help you to address them, given the wisdom of ages you are tapping into. You will grow in wisdom and grace - unless you choose one of the ‘alternative’ sects which preach, for example, that the world ends tomorrow, and you end up one of 900 people dead outside Georgetown, Guyana, because your leader told you to drink strychnine poison in anticipation.
I have spoken about values and belief systems because I think most religions grew out of ancient creation myths (not your ordinary myth!) of cultures and civilisations.
These creation myths very often reflected the values of that culture, where it came from, how it got there, what its values are. Books 1 and 2 of Genesis are the creation myths (two of them) of the Judaeo-Christian tradition, for example.
Creation myths usually centred around an all-powerful force, which often, ultimately, was transformed into a perception of the godhead. In other words, I am saying that some of us are inclined to believe that God did not rise one fine day from his golden throne in the sky and say
Here I am: I am your God. Rather there was a gradual perception among humanity, reinforced by relatively random communication or revelations from God, that He did in fact exist, and mankind took it from there, in communication with God.
I have always assumed that a religion is a value/belief system that honours a godhead, in our case Yaweh or Jehovah,
I am that I am. On the other hand, The Buddha was not divine, and there is no deity associated with Buddhism. We might describe it as a systematic guide to honourable living and dying. But we do often call it a religion, and that’s OK too. Some people find it easier to do without a divinity/deity, especially where there are conceptual or spiritual stumbling blocks to belief in a Supreme Being. Others have been happy to combine Catholic belief with Buddhist teachings, or with Hindu teachings, and that is OK too. Why not, if it helps you to grow as a person?
Finally, there are agnostics - people who are not sure there is some kind of supreme being out there somewhere - and atheists (see Richard Dawkins
The God Delusion published recently). Within those two groups, there are those people who live lives of genuine service, lovingkindness, compassion and hope - the kind of characteristics we often associate with our religion. These people are sometimes called moral non-Christians. They are not called to faith; or they may decline to turn and face God. But they are nevertheless blessed, and I am of the belief that our God, in his lovingkindness for His Children, will ensure that they too will be received into His Kindgom. Catholics would say that those who rejected Him are damned to hell; I find that hard to believe. A close associate is a moral non-Christian and if we were all like him, the world would be a far far better place than we know now.
Jabulani