Why is the Eastern Orthodox Church false?

  • Thread starter Thread starter John214
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It would be interesting to explore the question, would the middle Eastern Christians have suffered as much if they
  • had evangelized the East
They did.
  • not split into 17 or so individual autocephelous churches
They are not ‘split’, they are united. Indeed the structure of the Church is a reflection of the Trinity
Why then did Jesus pray for unity among the apostles behind Peter, if division was not possible?
Where, pray tell, did Jesus pray for unity among the apostles ‘behind Peter’?

John
 
Peter’s ministry,the responsibility for the whole Church,was passed on to his successors in Rome.
Jesus Christ was preached throughout the world. The ministry of St Peter and ALL the Apostles was passed on to the WHOLE Church.
 
Irenaeus:

"But since it would be too long to enumerate in such a volume as this the succession of all the churches, we shall confound all those who, in whatever manner, whether through self-satisfaction or vainglory, or through blindness and wicked opinion, assemble other than where it is proper, by pointing out here the successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient church known to all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles. Peter and Paul, that church which has the tradition and the faith which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the apostles. With that church, because of its superior origin, all the churches must agree, that is, all the faithful in the whole world, and it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the apostolic tradition>'Against Heresies 3:3:2 [inter A.D. 180-190]).
Ah yes! The favorite Church Father quote to use by Roman Catholic apologists. This quote does not say what you think it is saying, my friend. Holy Orthodoxy does not deny that the ancient Roman Church was Apostolic and Orthodox? No one questions that it was a model of orthodoxy.

Sadly, the post schism Latin Church has added many innovations since St Irenaeus penned that quote. 😦
 
Where, pray tell, did Jesus pray for unity among the apostles ‘behind Peter’?

John
Luke 22:

24 a dispute arose among them as to which of them was considered to be greatest. 26 the greatest among you should be like the youngest, and the one who rules (hegeomai) like the one who serves. 27 For who is greater, the one who is at the table or the one who serves? Is it not the one who is at the table? But I am among you as one who serves. 28 You are those who have stood by me in my trials. 29 And I confer on you a kingdom, just as my Father conferred one on me, 30 so that you may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom and sit on thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. 31 “Simon, Simon, Satan has asked to sift you (plural) as wheat. 32 But I have prayed for you(singular), Simon, that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned back, strengthen (sterizo) your brothers.”

Hegeomai (Jesus is referring to Simon)

1) to lead
a) to go beforeb) to be a leader
1) to rule, command2) to have authority over3) a prince, of regal power, governor, viceroy, chief, leading as respects influence, controlling in counsel, overseers or leaders of the churches4) used of any kind of leader, chief, commander5) the leader in speech, chief, spokesman

2) to consider, deem, account, think

Sterizo
1) to make stable, place firmly, set fast, fix
2) to strengthen, make firm
3) to render constant, confirm, one’s mind

John 21:16…

Jesus to Peter, Feed, lead, rule, shepherd, my sheep
 
Luke 22:

24 a dispute arose among them as to which of them was considered to be greatest. 26 the greatest among you should be like the youngest, and the one who rules (hegeomai) like the one who serves. 27 For who is greater, the one who is at the table or the one who serves? Is it not the one who is at the table? But I am among you as one who serves. 28 You are those who have stood by me in my trials. 29 And I confer on you a kingdom, just as my Father conferred one on me, 30 so that you may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom and sit on thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. 31 “Simon, Simon, Satan has asked to sift you (plural) as wheat. 32 But I have prayed for you(singular), Simon, that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned back, strengthen (sterizo) your brothers.”
Jesus Christ knows that St Peter is about to deny Him thrice. He prays for him so that his faith may not fail–so that he does not fall into despair and hang himself like Judas. Then of course we see Jesus Christ restoring St Peter’s Apostolic standing at the end of St John’s Gospel–the triple affirmation for the triple denial–because St Peter wept and repented instead of falling into despair and suicide.
 
Jesus Christ knows that St Peter is about to deny Him thrice. He prays for him so that his faith may not fail–so that he does not fall into despair and hang himself like Judas.
Where do you come up with this stuff?
40.png
Micky:
Then of course we see Jesus Christ restoring St Peter’s Apostolic standing at the end of St John’s Gospel–the triple affirmation for the triple denial–because St Peter wept and repented instead of falling into despair and suicide.
Peter wasn’t a despairing kinda guy. Besides, they all knew including Peter that Peter would deny Jesus because Jesus told them all ahead of time, how Satan was going to sift them, and that Peter would deny Jesus 3 times. There were no surprises here. Peter didn’t lose his apostolic standing, nor was he going to commit suicide.

:coffeeread: sheesh
 
Where do you come up with this stuff?
Sacred Scripture.
Peter wasn’t a despairing kinda guy.
You knew him personally? :rolleyes:
Besides, they all knew including Peter that Peter would deny Jesus
Wuh? They were told, but you can be sure that St Peter did not believe for a second that he would deny his Master. That is why he wept.

You see Steve, St Peter and Judas teach us some very valuable Scriptural lessons. Despair leads to death. Repentance leads to life. Jesus Christ prays for St Peter that he not fall into despair.
 
Jesus Christ was preached throughout the world. The ministry of St Peter and ALL the Apostles was passed on to the WHOLE Church.
Only Peter had the ministry of care for the whole Church.

St. John Chrysostom:

“After that grave fall (for there is no sin equal to denial) after so great a sin, He brought him back to his former honor and entrusted him with the headship of the universal church, and, what is more than all, He showed us that he had a greater love for his master than any of the apostles, for saith he: ‘Peter lovest thou Me more than these?’” (Hom 5 de Poen 2, vol II, 308[311])

“He saith to him, ‘Feed My sheep.’ Why does He pass over the others and speak of the sheep to Peter? He was the chosen one of the apostles, the mouth of the disciples, and the head of the choir; for this reason Paul went up to see him rather than the others. And also to show him that he must have confidence now, since his denial had been purged away, He entrusts him with the rule over the brethren; and the fervent love which thou hast shown throughout, and in which thou didst boast, show now; and the life which thou saidst thou wouldst lay down for Me, give for My sheep.” (Hom 88[87] in Joann 1, vol VIII, 477-9[525-6])

“If anyone should say ‘Why then was it James who received the See of Jerusalem?’ I should reply that He made Peter the teacher not of that See but of the world.” (Homily 88[87])

St. Basil:

“And when he, the instrument of such and so great a judgment; he the minister of the so great wrath of God upon a sinner; that blessed Peter, who was preferred before all the disciples; who alone received a greater testimony and blessing than the rest; he to whom were entrusted the keys of the kingdom of heaven,…” (Procem. de Judic. Dei)
 
Only Peter had the ministry of care for the whole Church.
Wrong. St Peter and ALL the Apostles.

St John Chrysosotom

For the Son of thunder, the beloved of Christ,
the pillar of the Churches throughout the world, who holds the keys of heaven, who drank the cup of Christ, and was baptized with His baptism, who lay upon his Master’s bosom, with much confidence, this man now comes forward to us now

The merciful God is wont to give this honor to his servants, that by their grace others may acquire salvation; as was agreed by the blessed Paul, that teacher of the world who emitted the rays of his teaching everywhere

This (James) was bishop, as they say, and therefore he speaks last. There was no arrogance in the Church. After Peter, Paul speaks, and none silences him: James waits patiently; not starts up (for the next word). No word speaks John here, no word the other Apostles, but held their peace, for James was invested with the chief rule, and think it no hardship. So clean was their soul from love of glory. Peter indeed spoke more strongly, but James here more mildly: for thus it behooves one in high authority, to leave what is unpleasant for others to say, while he himself appears in the milder part.

He speaks from this time lowly things, on his way to His passion, that He might show His humanity. For He that hath built His church upon Peter’s confession, and has so fortified it, that ten thousand dangers and deaths are not to prevail over it…
 
Ah yes! The favorite Church Father quote to use by Roman Catholic apologists. This quote does not say what you think it is saying, my friend. Holy Orthodoxy does not deny that the ancient Roman Church was Apostolic and Orthodox? No one questions that it was a model of orthodoxy.

Sadly, the post schism Latin Church has added many innovations since St Irenaeus penned that quote. 😦
I would agree to this, and add that the early Church Fathers wrote at a time when the Catholic Church was within Orthodoxy; the situation then was different from what it is from 1054 onwards. Thus, at that time they wrote it, it was still true of the Patriarchate in Rome.
 
I would agree to this, and add that the early Church Fathers wrote at a time when the Catholic Church was within Orthodoxy; the situation then was different from what it is from 1054 onwards. Thus, at that time they wrote it, it was still true of the Patriarchate in Rome.
Amen brother.

That is why I find it ludicrous when amateur RC apologists (such as anthony) flood the forum with quotes which prove nothing except that the Latin Church was within the fold of Orthodoxy at one time–united with the other four Patriarchates.

The RC apologists are reading modernist Latin innovations into the early Church writings–it is unfortunate.
 
Amen brother.

That is why I find it ludicrous when amateur RC apologists (such as anthony) flood the forum with quotes which prove nothing except that the Latin Church was within the fold of Orthodoxy at one time–united with the other four Patriarchates.

The RC apologists are reading modernist Latin innovations into the early Church writings–it is unfortunate.
It’s like saying a 19th century book about America can be applied to 21st century America–of course that would be nonsensical, unless one thinks slavery and racism are still part of the general public.
 
40.png
Mickey:
Wrong. St Peter and ALL
the Apostles.

Optatus of Milevis:
“For the good of unity Blessed Peter deserved to be preferred before the rest, and alone received the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, that he might communicate them to the rest.” Optatus of Mileve, The Schism of Donatists, 7:3 (c.A.D. 367).

In answer to your first quote…

How many other Church fathers claimed that John was the pillar of the Churches throughout the world? John Chrysostom says here that Peter is the pillar of the Church.

“Peter was to be entrusted with the keys of the church, or, rather, he was entrusted with the keys of heaven, and he was to be entrusted with the multitude of the people…That Peter the head of the apostles, the unshaken foundation, the unbroken rock, the first in the Church, the unconquerable port, the unshaken tower…he who was to be entrusted with the Church, the pillar of the Church, the port of the faith, Peter, the teacher of the whole world…Peter, that column, that bulwark.” (Homily on SS. Peter and Elias)

In answer to your second quote…

Yes,Paul was a teacher of the world,but he was not the Head of the apostles. He did not have authority over the whole Church as Peter did.

John Chrysostom:
“He saith to him, ‘Feed My sheep.’ Why does He pass over the others and speak of the sheep to Peter? He was the chosen one of the apostles, the mouth of the disciples, and the head of the choir; for this reason Paul went up to see him rather than the others. And also to show him that he must have confidence now, since his denial had been purged away, He entrusts him with the rule over the brethren; and the fervent love which thou hast shown throughout, and in which thou didst boast, show now; and the life which thou saidst thou wouldst lay down for Me, give for My sheep.” (Hom 88[87] in Joann 1)

“You see his [Paul] humble soul? You see how he sets himself below all saints, not merely below all the apostles? And feeling this towards all, he was aware how great a superiority Peter must enjoy, and he reverences him more than all men, and he esteemed him according to his dignity.” (In illud, 378[368])

In answer to your third quote…

John Chrysostom:
“If anyone should say ‘Why then was it James who received the See of Jerusalem?’ I should reply that He made Peter the teacher not of that See but of the world.” (Homily 87[88])

In answer to your fourth quote…

The Church fathers didn’t separate Peter’s confession from Peter himself.

John Chysostom:
“Peter himself the Head or Crown of the Apostles, the First in the Church, the Friend of Christ, who received a revelation, not from man, but from the Father, as the Lord bears witness to him, saying, ‘Blessed art thou, &c.’ This very Peter; - and when I name Peter, I name that unbroken Rock, that firm Foundation, the Great Apostle, First of the disciples” (Homily 3, On Penance)

St. Basil:
"One of these mountains was Peter, upon which rock the Lord promised to build His Church (Comm. in Esai 2,66)

Gregory of Nazianzen:
“Seest thou that of the disciples of Christ, all of whom were exalted and deserving of choice, one is called rock, and is entrusted with the foundations of the church.” Oration 32:18 (A.D. 380)

St. Cyril of Alexandria :
“He suffers him no longer to be called Simon, exercising authority and rule over him already having become His own. By a title suitable to the thing, He changed his name into Peter, from the word ‘petra’ (rock); for on him He was afterwards to found His Church.” (Cyril, T. iv. Comm. in Joan.)
 
Only Peter had the ministry of care for the whole Church.
That would be quite a surprise, for St. Cyprian of Carthage clearly says all the bishops had that same ministry for the whole Church:

Assuredly the rest of the apostles were also the same as was Peter, endowed with a like partnership both of honour and power; but the beginning proceeds from unity.

Cyprian notes that the point of unity is Peter; however, that does not mean it ends with Peter, as he would go on to say that this unity is held by all the bishops.
 
Optatus of Milevis
You attempt to play the quote game by assuming that people will read the papal innovations into the early Church–it does not wash.

St Augustine****
In a passage in this book, I said about the Apostle Peter: ‘On him as on a rock the Church was built’…But I know that very frequently at a later time, I so explained what the Lord said: ‘Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church,’ that it be understood as built upon Him whom Peter confessed saying: ‘Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God,’ and so Peter, called after this rock, represented the person of the Church which is built upon this rock, and has received ‘the keys of the kingdom of heaven.’ For, ‘Thou art Peter’ and not ‘Thou art the rock’ was said to him. But ‘the rock was Christ,’ in confessing whom, as also the whole Church confesses, Simon was called Peter. But let the reader decide which of these two opinions is the more probable (The Fathers of the Church (Washington D.C., Catholic University, 1968), Saint Augustine, The Retractations Chapter 20.1).

**And I tell you…‘**You are Peter, Rocky, and on this rock I shall build my Church, and the gates of the underworld will not conquer her. To you shall I give the keys of the kingdom. Whatever you bind on earth shall also be bound in heaven; whatever you loose on earth shall also be loosed in heaven’ (Mt 16:15-19). In Peter, Rocky, we see our attention drawn to the rock. Now the apostle Paul says about the former people, ‘They drank from the spiritual rock that was following them; but the rock was Christ’ (1 Cor 10:4). So this disciple is called Rocky from the rock, like Christian from Christ…Why have I wanted to make this little introduction? In order to suggest to you that in Peter the Church is to be recognized. Christ, you see, built his Church not on a man but on Peter’s confession. What is Peter’s confession? ‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.’ There’s the rock for you, there’s the foundation, there’s where the Church has been built, which the gates of the underworld cannot conquer (John Rotelle, Ed., The Works of Saint Augustine (New Rochelle: New City Press, 1993), Sermons, Vol. 6, Sermon 229P.1, p. 327).
 
St Ambrose
He, then, who before was silent, to teach us that we ought not to repeat the words of the impious, this one, I say, when he heard, ‘But who do you say I am,’ immediately, not unmindful of his station, exercised his primacy, that is, the primacy of confession, not of honor; the primacy of belief, not of rank. This, then, is Peter, who has replied for the rest of the Apostles; rather, before the rest of men. And so he is called the foundation, because he knows how to preserve not only his own but the common foundation…Faith, then, is the foundation of the Church, for it was not said of Peter’s flesh, but of his faith, that ‘the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.’ But his confession of faith conquered hell. And this confession did not shut out one heresy, for, since the Church like a good ship is often buffeted by many waves, the foundation of the Church should prevail against all heresies (The Fathers of the Church (Washington D.C., Catholic University, 1963), Saint Ambrose, Theological and Dogmatic Works, The Sacrament of the Incarnation of Our Lord IV.32-V.34, pp. 230-231).
 
How many other Church fathers claimed that John was the pillar of the Churches throughout the world?
St. Cyril of Alexandria**, Letter to Nestorius:
**
“Peter and John were equal in dignity and honor. Christ is the foundation of all -the unshakeable Rock upon which we are all built as a spiritual edifice.”
 
“The rock is the unity of faith, not the person of Peter.” -Saint Cyprian (258 A.D.), De Catholicae Eccesiae Unitate, cap. 4-5

**“The Rock (**petra) is the blessed and only rock of the faith confessed by the mouth of Peter. It is on this Rock of the confession of faith that the Church is built.”
**-Saint Hilary of **Poitiers (c. 315-368), 2nd Book on the Trinity.

"If you believe that God has raised the whole building of His Church on Peter alone, what will you say of John, the Son of Thunder? What will you say of each of the apostles? Will you venture to say that the gates of hell shall not prevail against Peter in particular, but shall prevail against all the others ? Are not the words addressed to them all? -****

Saint Jerome** (419 A.D.), 6th Book on Matthew**
 
“The word ‘Rock’ has only a denominative value–it signifies nothing but the steadfast and firm faith of the apostles.” -**Saint Cyril of Alexandria (444 A.D)

**
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top