Whether or not a priest somewhere at some time “said it,” is inconsequential as far as the moral question goes unless one thinks priests are morally infallible.
So…no freedom of speech on here. Duly noted Oh, stop it!
LOL
You mean sending unnamed and unaccountable “federal officers” from various rag-tag agencies with no training on handling civilian crowd control issues? The ones who “kidnapped” people thinking they were “arresting” them when they had no probable cause? Those officers?
No, I won’t. I’ve told you I don’t support abortion. I think more than once. So, stop it.
You know, I think I’ve made my position clear. Your outrageous claims and allegations don’t make your position any stronger.
I referring to the actual officers in Washington DC and the Pacific Northwest, not the Guard troops in the District that attacked peaceful protesters in Lafayette square so Trump could stage his Bible phioto op. But, yeah, there’s that to.
Yeah, probably be easier to set you to ignore. Why don’t you do the same to me.
@NSmith They would say that Trump greatly weakened environmental regulations. He pulled out Paris Accords. He also stacked the EPA with people from the energy sector and removed scientists.
This part I can agree with. The individual’s state of mind might be invincible ignorance. They might not know what the Church teaches and be innocent in that ignorance.
This is partly true. There may be Biden positions (though I don’t think any are real other than pro-abortion and pro-taxation) that a person might think meritorious. But that’s not the whole story. There must be a “proportionate” (equally grave) reason to vote for an abortion-supporting candidate like Biden. In this election there is nowhere near a 'proportionate reason". Is “taxing the rich” (which won’t happen anyway, but let’s assume it) really equally grave to killing hundreds of thousands of children? Why did the U.S. Bishops tell us abortion is the “preeminent issue” in this election? It’s because there is no “proportionate reason” to support abortion with Biden.
No evidence of that.
How many have died?
Evangelicals and traditional Catholics have allowed him to repent and reform. Liberals don’t. There is no evidence whatever that he has engaged in promiscuous or adulterous activity for years. On the other hand, he is the only president who has ever addressed the March for Life or saved the Catholic charities from the Obama abortifacient mandate.
The U.S. sequesters as much atmospheric carbon as it generates, possibly more. And we’re a lot closer to a low CO2 level at which all plant life dies (about 180 PPM) than we are to the known maximum (about 4,000 PPM) during which both plant and animal life thrived. We’re around 400 PPM presently.
What’s the difference between saying that its been hijacked and it really being an overriding duty to oppose abortion?
Quite possibly not. But when one is on a Catholic site, one feels obligated to present the Church’s position, particularly in face of the false assertions of some who would lead people astray with the pro-abortion arguments designed to do exactly that.