Why liberals care about climate change, but not abortion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxirad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It won’t. Democrat polices create poverty, not wealth. All of the inner cities that have elected no one but Democrats for decades proves that.
Let’s make a checklist

Used my age against me? :yup:

Used Business Example without using any sources? :yup:

Pointed out that the Left isn’t Christian, even if they claim to be? :yup:

Assumed my opinion on
“using the force of government to take from others and give to “the poor”-------even though in America the poorest people are still collectively the 18th wealthiest nation on earth if it were broken down”
when I never stated any of those things nor was evidence produced about the 18th statistic? :yup

Minority? :yup

Trump Supporter? :yup:
 
TeenCatholicGuy;14707553]I am not arguing for the Democrats, but it’s the point that matters.
All you’ve done ever since you signed up is post Democrat talking points.
Helping the poor=Less Abortions.
Democrat policies don’t help the poor!
There is NOTHING on any Republican Platform that says anything about helping the poor.
Guess again:

gop.com/platform/renewing-american-values/
But what about the president’s ability to appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade? Republicans have appointed 12 of the last 16 justices, but still the Supreme Court has not overturned Roe v. Wade. For this to happen, a president would need to appoint enough justices to have at least a five justice majority willing to overturn Roe v. Wade. This is complicated; during confirmation hearings, nominees never comment on how they would rule on specific issues that might come before the Court. You can never really know how a nominee will rule until they are already on the bench and ruling. Thus, a Catholic could look at this scenario and reasonably conclude that it is very unlikely Roe v. Wade will ever be overturned.
No one ever said the GOP court appointees were great. But the Democrats are FAR worse.
Additionally, overturning Roe v. Wade wouldn’t actually make abortion illegal; it would merely bounce the issue back to individual states to decide. I think it’s pretty safe to assume that if Roe v. Wade were overturned, some states would have legal abortions available with few or no restrictions, some states would have more restrictions, and some states would make abortion illegal.
:rolleyes:

That is what I have said over and over.
Would these women then resort to illegal abortions?
Possibly, but it would also greatly reduce the number of abortions.
What would the punishment be for breaking the law?
Like any other alleged crime: relative to the circumstances, the evidence and the offense against justice.
 
SuperLuigi;14707549:
Your claims are just talking points. ‘Postmodernism’, ‘culture of death.’ The ones that aren’t are not fully supported by evidence (Democrats don’t understand human incentive, but countries with similar policies perform well, Americans under Democrat rule don’t, therefore Americans are utterly different from every other group of humans under the sun).
One thing that does show, is that Abortion rates ARE FALLING.

Destroying Obamacare and lowering taxes for the rich does NOTHING to help the poorest Americans.
 
If you really want to help people, then you darn well be able to see beyond the bleed-heart talking points you keep posting all over this forum because otherwise you will make it WORSE for the people you claim to want to help.

Also, I’m a minority, and I’ve heard all of these arguments before. I do not for 5 seconds believe people on the Western left when they say they want to help or talk about how Christian they are, especially since the second they have to give something of their own up, they stop short. That’s not Christian at all as Jesus talked about personal sacrifice, not showing every 4 years to vote for Hillary or Trudeau.

See, it’s easy to be in high school and advocate for using the force of government to take from others and give to “the poor”-------even though in America the poorest people are still collectively the 18th wealthiest nation on earth if it were broken down------but not so easy when you’ve got a business to run, people to employ and the government takes 60 cents of every dollar and wastes it on things like war or lining their own pockets-----even the nice Democrats whom you absolutely adore.
Um, he has 51 posts. Where has been peddling 'bleeding heart’s stuff nonstop? And no need for ad hominem.

And as for Jesus, he was for personal sacrifice. The bad thing for western capitalism is that Jesus and the early Christian community lived in a way that made Kropotkin smile. Ayn Rand was left out in the cold apparently.
 
All you’ve done ever since you signed up is post Democrat talking points.

Democrat policies don’t help the poor!

Guess again:

gop.com/platform/renewing-american-values/

No one ever said the GOP court appointees were great. But the Democrats are FAR worse.

:rolleyes:

That is what I have said over and over.

Possibly, but it would also greatly reduce the number of abortions.

Like any other alleged crime: relative to the circumstances, the evidence and the offense against justice.
Never mentioned the Dems, I just stated fact, help poor=Less Abortions.

The GOP platform is one thing, how they act in Congress and in the Senate is different.
Destroying Obamacare, which was at least a start and replacing it with “Trumpcare” HURTS 20 million+ Americans, and that’s a Conservative estimate! (LOL, Puns)

No, you haven’t. Otherwise you wouldn’t be arguing against me.

How would it reduce the # of abortions. They could legit go to Canada, which already has a steadily increasing abortion rate.

I quoted the article.
 
Um, he has 51 posts. Where has been peddling 'bleeding heart’s stuff nonstop? And no need for ad hominem.

And as for Jesus, he was for personal sacrifice. The bad thing for western capitalism is that Jesus and the early Christian community lived in a way that made Kropotkin smile. Ayn Rand was left out in the cold apparently.
Even suggesting Trump has sacrificed anything for the People is laughable.

I’m talking laughing for a year laughable.

The “Personal Sacrifice” argument in his part is kinda off-topic.
 
=TeenCatholicGuy;14707577]Never mentioned the Dems, I just stated fact, help poor=Less Abortions.
Your intentions are obvious.
The GOP platform is one thing, how they act in Congress and in the Senate is different.
Yeah, they’re not conservative enough.
Destroying Obamacare, which was at least a start and replacing it with “Trumpcare” HURTS 20 million+ Americans, and that’s a Conservative estimate! (LOL, Puns)
:rotfl:

If you wouldn’t blindly follow the American mainstream media, you’d know that’s a CBO estimate and that CBO estimates don’t mean squat.

Americans voted for Trump in no small part because several million are paying massive premium increases because of Obamacare.
How would it reduce the # of abortions. They could legit go to Canada, which already has a steadily increasing abortion rate.
Only with a fake Canadian ID card…
 
TeenCatholicGuy;14707564:
Translation: time to play the victim.

Level of education, not age. And it wasn’t used against you.

Thanks, but considering I do this for a living, I count. 🙂

Strawman.

Never said that, I said that it wasn’t Christian to use the force of government to give to the poor.

Never assumed your opinion on anything.

Source = Jordan B. Peterson, clinical psychologist, University of Toronto, former Harvard professor.

Figures a supporter of the Democrats would respond in this way. I knew I was right to vote GOP the last several election cycles.

Now who’s making the assumptions? YOU.
But I never said “the force of government should be used to help the poor”. I mean, there should be nothing wrong with that, as HELPING THE POOR IS CHRISTIAN. I mean, it’s kinda the point.

You pointed out i was in High School, you feeling the need to do so is… what exactly?

Ignores the entire sentence.

An actual article as a source?

You assumed I was a Democrat.

Look at what the GOP are doing rn, NOTHING to help the Poor, NOTHING to help lower abortion rates. I don’t see any Christian Values in any of the bills they have or tried to pass thus far.
 
=TeenCatholicGuy;14707582]Even suggesting Trump has sacrificed anything for the People is laughable.
I never said he did, but I’ll up his record of giving against Canadian Labour leaders any day.
The “Personal Sacrifice” argument in his part is kinda off-topic.
No, it isn’t. Your talking points (make no mistake, that is what they are) state that the :bighanky: caring government :crying: has to come in and make life all fair for everyone, because I guess those liberals just can’t be bothered to voluntarily part with their stuff-------even though they “care”.

Why don’t you put your money where your mouth is and sell your computer to help the poor if you care so much about them and the climate. Or do you have to wait for Trudeau to come and confiscate it?
 
I said that it wasn’t Christian to use the force of government to give to the poor.
Wait wait wait wait wait… Says who?

Says Leo XIII in Rerum Novarum? Quadrageismo Anno? Centesimus annus?

As a Catholic you have no right to say what is Christian and what isn’t. The Holy Mother Church decides that. And your Randian philosophy is NOT what the Church teaches.
 
Your intentions are obvious.

Yeah, they’re not conservative enough.

:rotfl:

If you wouldn’t blindly follow the American mainstream media, you’d know that’s a CBO estimate and that CBO estimates don’t mean squat.

Americans voted for Trump in no small part because several million are paying massive premium increases because of Obamacare.

Only with a fake Canadian ID card…
CBO is non-partisan. Even if we assume they aren’t, what does the Republican Healthcare plan actually do? You also are assuming I only take in American Mainstream Media, and that i’m sort of robot that believes everything I see online. I take what I see, and form my own opinions. I mean it when I say: Republicans showcase little to no Catholic Values.

Yeah, and those increases are only going to get bigger under the new plan(s). So, how does that help anything? Also, that’s not how Canadian Healthcare works.

Majority of Americans didn’t vote for Donald Trump, and Majority of Catholics didn’t either.
americamagazine.org/politics-society/2017/04/06/new-data-suggest-clinton-not-trump-won-catholic-vote
 
I never said he did, but I’ll up his record of giving against Canadian Labour leaders any day.

No, it isn’t. Your talking points (make no mistake, that is what they are) state that the :bighanky: caring government :crying: has to come in and make life all fair for everyone, because I guess those liberals just can’t be bothered to voluntarily part with their stuff-------even though they “care”.

Why don’t you put your money where your mouth is and sell your computer to help the poor if you care so much about them and the climate. Or do you have to wait for Trudeau to come and confiscate it?
The amount of assumptions in a partial paragraph is astounding.

I bet you’ve never heard a 15 year old use the word “astounding” much less know how to spell it.

Don’t treat me like I’m dumb. I’ve debated with Hardcore Conservatives, and after revealing my age after, they have all admitted I am one of the toughest debaters they’ve met. #ImTheNextKellyanne #NewAlternativeFacts
 
Wait wait wait wait wait… Says who?

Says Leo XIII in Rerum Novarum? Quadrageismo Anno? Centesimus annus?

As a Catholic you have no right to say what is Christian and what isn’t. The Holy Mother Church decides that. And your Randian philosophy is NOT what the Church teaches.
+1
 
But I never said “the force of government should be used to help the poor”.
You were supporting the DNC platform. That is at its very core. Did you even read it?
I mean, there should be nothing wrong with that,
“should be” and “are”---------those are different. Learn it, if you’re serious about this.
as HELPING THE POOR IS CHRISTIAN. I mean, it’s kinda the point.
It doesn’t help the poor. All it does is line the pockets of corrupt liberals and makes the poor dependent on government. No one gets ahead and it destroys the nuclear family.
You pointed out i was in High School, you feeling the need to do so is… what exactly?
It was an example.
An actual article as a source?
I think two acdemics who have published is good enough and better than some liberal article.
You assumed I was a Democrat.
Wrong again. Only said you post their talking points.
Look at what the GOP are doing rn, NOTHING to help the Poor, NOTHING to help lower abortion rates.
Moving to restrict abortion funding will help lower the rates, and all of their fiscal policies help the poor.

Canada would be wise to follow their lead, if they had any sense left.
I don’t see any Christian Values in any of the bills they have or tried to pass thus far.
First of all, I’m only interested in Catholic values, not just generic Christian values.

Second, the GOP has introduced legislation to fix health care (although the feds should have nothing to do with it, as we’ve seen national health care fail in Canada and the UK), lower taxes to help poor people, and defend Planned Parenthood among others.
 
=StudentMI;14707587]Wait wait wait wait wait… Says who?
Says Leo XIII in Rerum Novarum? Quadrageismo Anno? Centesimus annus?
As a Catholic you have no right to say what is Christian and what isn’t. The Holy Mother Church decides that.
Sorry, mean to never was. I missed a negative, but thanks for the judgement.
And your Randian philosophy is NOT what the Church teaches.
Ad hominem attack.
 
You were supporting the DNC platform. That is at its very core. Did you even read it?

“should be” and “are”---------those are different. Learn it, if you’re serious about this.

It doesn’t help the poor. All it does is line the pockets of corrupt liberals and makes the poor dependent on government. No one gets ahead and it destroys the nuclear family.

It was an example.

I think two acdemics who have published is good enough and better than some liberal article.

Wrong again. Only said you post their talking points.

Moving to restrict abortion funding will help lower the rates, and all of their fiscal policies help the poor.

Canada would be wise to follow their lead, if they had any sense left.

First of all, I’m only interested in Catholic values, not just generic Christian values.

Second, the GOP has introduced legislation to fix health care (although the feds should have nothing to do with it, as we’ve seen national health care fail in Canada and the UK), lower taxes to help poor people, and defend Planned Parenthood among others.
As a Canadian, I take extreme offense when you dare say that our healthcare system is failing. I can walk into any hospital in Ontario, and get treated by a Dr. He can order an X-ray or a Ultrasound or any other scan and give me a prescription for my ailment. All of that, for $0. It costs me for the prescription, but my Insurance my Father got through his work reduces it up to 90+%. Sometimes Prescriptions are as little as $5.

I can walk into any Walk-in Clinic and be treated for nothing.

And you dare say that our healthcare system is “failing” while Obamacare and Trumpcare are SO terrible, you could say our healthcare was working with Star Wars era tech, and America is still in the Middle Ages. Neither party is properly considering HOW HEALTHCARE WORKS. However, GOP is NOT FIXING HEALTHCARE! How? Premiums will go up for the majority, while they will be reduced for the rich! HOW IS THAT FIXED?
 
This is probably going to upset people, but I believe this is more accurate.

Abortion isn’t as big of an issue as Climate Change, Social Security etc.

uscatholic.org/blog/201603/can-catholic-vote-democrat-moral-considerations-30587
From that link

“In my post a couple of days ago, I pointed out that in Faithful Citizenship*, *the USCCB made it clear that the church cannot tell Catholics how to vote on election day. Instead, Catholics must vote with their conscience. Depending on the circumstances, that may mean Catholics feel “morally grave considerations” call them to vote for a candidate who otherwise supports what we believe to be a grave moral evil—like abortion or torture. The current post looks more closely at these “morally grave reasons.” What could possibly justify a Catholic’s vote for a political candidate who wants abortion to remain legal?”

Do you know why the Catholic Church doesn’t weigh in on giving Catholics direct instruction for voting? It’s not mentioned anywhere in that article or links within that article.

Because of the Johnson Amendment. The Church as a result of that amendment, could be prosecuted by the government and lose tax exempt status, if they give advice from the “pulpit” so to speak, on how to vote.

if the government even gets a whiff of a Church trying to educate on how to vote on a subject or candidate, they could have their tax exempt status revoked. And the govt would LOVE LOVE LOVE to revoke the Catholic Church tax exempt status.

So the bishops have to be politically correct to avoid the govt intrusion into Church teaching.

But don’t think that changes our responsibility as voters. Catholics are to vote pro life, in party and candidate.

irs.gov/uac/charities-churches-and-politics
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top