S
steve_b
Guest
So is the answer true or false?Please take the time to read and reflect on it.
So is the answer true or false?Please take the time to read and reflect on it.
This seems like a loaded question. What do you mean by “availlable”?If they are members of the Church they are entitled to be called Catholic, and have all the sacraments of the Church available to them…true?.
Members i.e. Catholics have the sacraments of the Church available to them. It’s not a loaded question.This seems like a loaded question. What do you mean by “availlable”?
The whole world has the Sacraments availlable to them. But we must approach them in the manner the Church offers.
Yes without humilty. Which you can only truely find in the presence of another human being.It makes your confession to God honest and with true sorrow - which is why a lot of people don’t want to do it.It makes your confession worthy before God because you can’t fake it.I think that “confessing sins directly to God” is a nice sounding rationalization. Gets people off the hook for actually having to prepare, screw up courage, and say out loud to another human being what you have done and failed to do.
The effect is very different.
I agree in part. I think that before we get to the confessional we should have already turned our hearts from our sin. This should be in a open acknowledgement before God in secret. We can always pray to Him in a sincere heart and He will help bring us to full contrition.I think that “confessing sins directly to God” is a nice sounding rationalization. Gets people off the hook for actually having to prepare, screw up courage, and say out loud to another human being what you have done and failed to do.
The effect is very different.
Yes without humilty. Which you can only truely find in the presence of another human being.It makes your confession to God honest and with true sorrow - which is why a lot of people don’t want to do it.It makes your confession worthy before God because you can’t fake it.

What answer? It seems to have been lost in all of this argumentation and derailing. Are they full members? No! If they do not believe that Christ is present in the Holy Eucharist (and all teachings of Christ’s Church), then they profane the Eucharist by receiving it. Yet, they are baptized into the Body of Christ and believe in Him.So is the answer true or false?
This does miss the point, at least in part. Confessing sins to another person is an apparent psychological need–look at how many confess faults to a bartender, or a stranger on a plane, and so on, without any legal protection whatsoever. But Sacramental confession is not just to another human person. The priest is there in persona Christi–that is, officially and so making present God, who is the one who, after all is said, is the only one who can forgive sins. Additionally, the priest also represents the community, which is also harmed by sin. So, by having the status of a minister of Christ, the priest is able to mediate or represent all the injured parties, outside of the sinner him- or herself, and is an ideal agent for reconciliation.I think past the legalistic thinking, confession to the Priest just makes perfect sense. Should it be the case you are working through a particular issue, why would you believe it best to do this alone, when alone is how your arrived in the state of vice or habit? I don’t know, to me it just seems counterproductive. Isn’t it about honesty. So your admitting both inwardly and outwardly you are falling short. I don’t see where this can’t be anything but productive.
Beyond that, it is also easy to say to yourself, “Gee, I can do that any time,” and never actually get around to doing it. By involving another person (and schedules or appointments and other sacraments, which may not be received when in a state of serious sin), we are moved to actually do it now, not in some nebulous future.I think that “confessing sins directly to God” is a nice sounding rationalization. Gets people off the hook for actually having to prepare, screw up courage, and say out loud to another human being what you have done and failed to do.
The effect is very different.
This shows one limit of sola Scriptura: Scripture itself is true, but it does not offer guidance as to how it should be interpreted. Even adding other references–such as Matthew 16:19b; 18:18 that come to mind–does not fully tell us how to interpret it. Only the faithful tradition of the Church can do that, under the authoritative interpretation of the magisterium as received by the community.today we celebrated Pentecost -3 rd most important feast day in the Church-
at the end of the Gospel reading from John - there is the statement about “Whose sins you forgive they are forgiven-whose sins you retain they are retained” -pretty clear to me- but was the Lord giving the franchise on the forgiveness of sins purely to the Apostles -( and by those who the Apostles layed on hands and so forth) or could a sinner bypass the Priest and go direct to the Lord-?
no answer there- we have general confession in my denomination but also can have a Private confession-but it is clear that the Priest will acknowledge the forgiveness of sins but does ot grant it-
It does make one think
Certainly you can, and while God would appreciate your repentance and service of the truth, you have still offended against Him as well. What do we do about personal sin? In the scriptures, Jesus told the sinner that their sins were forgiven. Thus, there was no doubt. See Matthew 9:2, Mark 2:5, Luke 5:20 and Luke 7:48 for examples. When we confess directly to God, do we hear those words of absolution? Do we receive spiritual direction? Are we certain (remember that Jesus did not leave us orphans) that our sins are truly forgiven? How can we be unless someone with authority to forgive sins tells us, exactly as Jesus did? And, the scriptures are very clear that Jesus gave the Apostles power to forgive sin. They passed that power on and today, almost 2,000 years later, not only Catholic Priests, abut also those of the Eastern Orthodox Churches have power over sin. It is a wonderful, freeing, reconciling experience. At the same time, it is sobering, as the evil one waits for us right outside the confessional.Could you confess your sins to others but not necessarily a priest? Like family or friends? Or does it have to be a priest?
Yes. Exactly.Beyond that, it is also easy to say to yourself, “Gee, I can do that any time,” and never actually get around to doing it. By involving another person (and schedules or appointments and other sacraments, which may not be received when in a state of serious sin), we are moved to actually do it now, not in some nebulous future.
Similar to the people who claim, “I can meet my spiritual needs by a nice nature walk in the forest or on the beach.” Perhaps–but when was the last time they actually took such a walk?
That’s what I meant by “prepare”. Examination of conscience precedes confession.I agree in part. I think that before we get to the confessional we should have already turned our hearts from our sin. This should be in a open acknowledgement before God in secret. We can always pray to Him in a sincere heart and He will help bring us to full contrition.