B
blackrobe
Guest
Ahh the Albigensians; still among us.Whats so holy about bringing another soul into this world of suffering? Naw God could’nt make such a thing.
JSA
Ahh the Albigensians; still among us.Whats so holy about bringing another soul into this world of suffering? Naw God could’nt make such a thing.
Feces beautiful? wow you’ve really convinced me. Why would I want a body after existing as a soul. One would think that latter would be superior.I like my body and it’s been very, very good to me. And I’m a cancer patient for the third time!
Even things that are apparently gross, like feces, are really an awesome thing if you understand nutrition and anatomy and physiology. I took a nutrition class last year with lots of science in it…and it really is awesome.
Better get used to having a body because you’ll have one for eternity. You get a body back at the Last Day.
(It will be perfected so hope you’re happy with it. I wouldn’t recommend complaining about the resurrection body at the Last Day to your Maker, He might think you’re an ungrateful little cad and throw you in with the goats.)
How could I be a heretic? You’re attitude that sex is good and therefore we should indulge in it is the very attitude which our modern society and many pagans have held. Cmon people theres more to life than sexPlease note further that God deems creation very good only after man and woman have been created. Until then, creation was just “good.” So in some sense the human body itself makes creation very good.
If you persist in believing that the body is evil or impure or intrinsically bad, then you are a heretic.
Matthew
If you have tried existing merely as a soul, I am sure you would not say that again.For without a body, the soul can do nothing.Why would I want a body after existing as a soul. One would think that latter would be superior.
Right then it is not contradictory.Sol Invictus,
This is a serious misunderstanding on your part. The Holy Spirit does NOT dwell in a person who is in a state of mortal sin. This is the crux of Catholic doctrine on grace.
When we are baptized, we receive sanctifying grace in our soul. Our soul becomes a dwelling place for the Holy Spirit.
HOWEVER, when we commit a mortal sin, that grace leaves our soul. God can never be in the presence of sin. This is why we must confess all mortal sin. When we are truly sorry for our sin, and we confess it, we are forgiven! And sanctifying grace comes into our soul once again.
This is why we should not receive the Eucharist while in a state of mortal sin. We are receiving the Body and Blood of Christ, and to receive Him while in a state of mortal sin is sacrilege.
On the other hand, to receive the Eucharist worthily is to strengthen that grace that is already present within us and puts us in communion with God. As He becomes a part of us, we become transformed to become more like Him.
Sol Invictus, remember that God is nothing but love and goodness, and all that He created is good. That includes the human body. We may sin with our body at times, but the body itself is a beautiful creation and is remarkable in all that it can do: our five senses, our beating heart, our blood, nerves, and organs…how do they do what they do??? The way a body can move and balance, from dancing to gymnastics to running to stretching, it’s all so amazing. We think and have emotions. All these things and more are a testament to the power, beauty, and goodness of God.
What?If you have tried existing merely as a soul, I am sure you would not say that again.For without a body, the soul can do nothing.
So you have been a disembodied soul and can testify otherwise?What?
Exactly. The body is the principle of differentiation. What a shock it will be for the Cathars and assorted gnostics to find that their bodies are what makes them who they are for all eternity.So you have been a disembodied soul and can testify otherwise?
For that matter, in Thomistic philosophy a soul that had never been in a body would not even be an individual.
Edwin
Well technically yes I was at one point. It was better to never have existed than exist in a body.So you have been a disembodied soul and can testify otherwise?
For that matter, in Thomistic philosophy a soul that had never been in a body would not even be an individual.
Edwin
So you have at one time existed merely as a soul. When did it happen? How did it happen? Did you see your body when you existed as a soul? Where were you when you were a soul?Well technically yes I was at one point. It was better to never have existed than exist in a body.
Ha…ha…ha…These things pale by comparison. The human body is the absolute pinnacle of God’s creation.
Despise the body? I’m not getting this…
To the best of my knowledge the Catholic church teaches their is far more to life than sex.How could I be a heretic? You’re attitude that sex is good and therefore we should indulge in it is the very attitude which our modern society and many pagans have held. Cmon people theres more to life than sex
2353 *Fornication *is carnal union between an unmarried man and an unmarried woman. It is gravely contrary to the dignity of persons and of human sexuality which is naturally ordered to the good of spouses and the generation and education of children. Moreover, it is a grave scandal when there is corruption of the young.
[2361](javascriptpenWindow(‘cr/2361.htm’)
"Sexuality, by means of which man and woman give themselves to one another through the acts which are proper and exclusive to spouses, is not something simply biological, but concerns the innermost being of the human person as such. It is realized in a truly human way only if it is an integral part of the love by which a man and woman commit themselves totally to one another until death."143
319 God created the world to show forth and communicate his glory. That his creatures should share in his truth, goodness and beauty - this is the glory for which God created them.
If I can bring a little laughter into someone’s life it will have been a good day indeed.Ha…ha…ha…
I think they should go for a walk in a beautiful meadow, grab a sunflower and marvel at the Fibonacci sequence contained in it’s patterns. Then perhaps they will understand that true appreciation for what it means to be human is to enter into the beauty and aesthetic intoxicants of God’s creation that are certainly mathematical but hardly the barren number-crunching capacity some seem to value above all else. They leave something important behind.What do you have to say about those people who want to upload their minds into computers, or replace their brain with a more powerful computational substrate…
With all due respect, you lack the vantage point to make such a pronouncement.The human body is far from perfect and it is not the apogee of evolution.
Did someone’s biochemistry book just vomit? The point is that these are all wonderful things. Biosynthetic pathways and seeing enzymes do their thing in and of itself has great beauty. I think we are on the same page here in the sense that this is good stuff.ACE receptor inhibitors, and angiotensin II antagonists, are used to combat hypertension; DPP-4 inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylureas, and the obvious insulin combat diabetes mellitus; protease inhibitors, reverse transcriptase inhibitors, entry inhibitors, integrase inhibitors combat HIV; SSRIs, SNRIs, and MAOI…
I do not know what I want to do for my career. Maybe, I should design drugs or identify potential targets… I felt rather inspired after reading about the efficacy of HAART and imatinib. These treatments were able to render terminal ailments (HIV and CML) into manageable chronic conditions. (Unfortunately, resistance to drugs developes in those therapies requiring the development of new drugs.) Metastatic cancer, however, is a different story, for example, erlotinib only yields a small survival advantage in advanced pancreatic cancer (fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/AC/05/briefing/2005-4174B1_03_01-OSI-Tarceva.pdf) when used with the current standard of care (gemicitabine). (Maybe IGR -1 receptor inhibitors might solve this problem as resistance developes); sunitinib is a contrary example as it significantly increases progression free survival time in RCC compared to interferon-alpha immunotherapy. (pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1906573)Well, I’m not a sci fi fan so I don’t know some of this stuff that you’re talking about. I do understand the Nietzschean desire to be Ubermensch though, and have much healthy skepticism because of the law of unintended consequences.
…
So all these scientists and researchers and docs and pharmaceutical and technology companies are great, they have my gratitude, they are doing the Lord’s work. It is a corporal work of mercy.
Meant to say “ACE inhibitors” and “angiotensin II receptor antiagonists”…ACE receptor inhibitors, and angiotensin II antagonists, are used to combat hypertension; DPP-4 inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylureas, and the obvious insulin combat diabetes mellitus; protease inhibitors, reverse transcriptase inhibitors, entry inhibitors, integrase inhibitors combat HIV; SSRIs, SNRIs, and MAOI