S
SteveVH
Guest
Yep. And denying it is much easier than practicing it.And why do you think this is possible?
Because you believe that…[the truth /is/ written on every man and woman’s heart].
?
Yep. And denying it is much easier than practicing it.And why do you think this is possible?
Because you believe that…[the truth /is/ written on every man and woman’s heart].
?
A fear shared by many Christians.I’d suggest that what many people may fear is the idea of returning to Christianity being entrenched in political power.
Well, the truth that exists within Christianity is always true whether or not anyone is practicing it. No religion or philosophy should be judged by those who fail to live what it teaches.It’s not clear how Christians can be so conveniently separated from Christianity as you suggest.
In fact, some non-Christians believe that Christians are Christianity; or that Christians are the ones who create Christianity; that there is no Christianity without Christians.
Your objection holds only if we take for granted that Christianity somehow exists apart from Christians.
It also rather begs the question as to whether they are rejecting Christianity alone, or also rejecting every other belief system which promotes similar ideas.I think it is quite possible that those who do not accept Christianity nevertheless know within themselves that what it espouses is, in fact, relevant. Knowing this, it is also possible to still reject it, which entails rejecting the truth written on every man and woman’s heart as well.
The idea of monogamy will always be there regardless of how many people subscribe to the idea. The idea of justice, honesty, and others will still be there no matter how many people believe in it. There is such a thing as objective reality.It’s not clear how Christians can be so conveniently separated from Christianity as you suggest.
In fact, some non-Christians believe that Christians are Christianity; or that Christians are the ones who create Christianity; that there is no Christianity without Christians.
Your objection holds only if we take for granted that Christianity somehow exists apart from Christians.
A good read is Screwtape Letters by CS Lewis. He writes that it’s a trick of the devil to say Christians don’t behave any betterThe duplicity of so many Christians - they say one thing, and do the opposite.
Such duplicity does not inspire trust for Christianity in non-Christians.
Then you’ve proven my point then, and you are an example of someone who believes that everyone believes that Christianity is right, but that some merely pretend not to believe it.Yep. And denying it is much easier than practicing it.
By what should a religion or philosophy be judged, if not by the behavior of those who claim to be its proponents?Well, the truth that exists within Christianity is always true whether or not anyone is practicing it. No religion or philosophy should be judged by those who fail to live what it teaches.
The idea of monogamy will always be there regardless of how many people subscribe to the idea. The idea of justice, honesty, and others will still be there no matter how many people believe in it. There is such a thing as objective reality.
I think you are just trying to downplay the responsibility of a theist.A good read is Screwtape Letters by CS Lewis. He writes that it’s a trick of the devil to say Christians don’t behave any better
We are sinners in need of a savior. That is the crux of the matter. Hopefully that leads to better behavior but no one knows the heart and mind of another and what sins they struggle with.
Also no one knows that one does when no person is “there” so to speak so it’s hard to judge behavior. Plus what do you judge when judging behavior? There are so many aspects of it?
So non theists have no standards? If they do what are they based upon?I think you are just trying to downplay the responsibility of a theist.
As if someone could claim to know the truth about God, and then freely behave “like everyone else.”
Theists are not ordinary people anymore.
It is justified to hold theists to the highest possible standard. Because they themselves are the ones claiming to know what that highest possible standard is.
I agree. If you don’t live it, you don’t believe it.By what should a religion or philosophy be judged, if not by the behavior of those who claim to be its proponents?
Putting a different spin on this, some people see Christianity as too “nosy” a religion (that is, nosy, though not necessarily noisy); in other words, too concerned with others’ welfare, particularly their spiritual welfare in the afterlife, with too much of a busybody attitude, overly zealous, self-righteous and arrogant in wishing to persuade, sometimes not so nicely, others to believe exactly what Christians believe, as though other people and cultures don’t have their own reason, intellect, or faith.Christianity also calls people to live according to certain moral guidelines that - in the view of some - limit personal freedom.
As sinners, we want to do what we want to do when we want to do it, and we take issue with anyone who stands in our way of getting what we want.
So So wrong. Jesus left us the Church and send the Advocate the Holy Spirit to bring us to the truth.Except that whatever one has ever heard on the topic of “God”, one has heard from people, not from God himself.
So even as one thinks one is trusting God, one is actually still trusting people.
And so do we hear this truth *directly *from the Holy Spirit, without *any *human medium, or do we, as Lucy107 said, hear it via people?So So wrong. Jesus left us the Church and send the Advocate the Holy Spirit to bring us to the truth.
I would not say Christianity alone by any means.It also rather begs the question as to whether they are rejecting Christianity alone, or also rejecting every other belief system which promotes similar ideas.
I am not making the claim that there is “A desire for there to be one God who incarnated as Jesus of Nazareth [which] is written on everyone’s heart”. I think there is an interior desire to know the One who made us, even by those who deny His existence. There is a desire to understand the meaning of our own existence.It’s much easier to justify the claim “A desire for justice and compassion is written on everyone’s heart” than it is to justify the claim “A desire for there to be one God who incarnated as Jesus of Nazareth is written on everyone’s heart”.
My point is that it cannot be judged solely by those who violate the very principles it espouses. There are hypocrites in every walk of life.By what should a religion or philosophy be judged, if not by the behavior of those who claim to be its proponents?
There is some good research to back you up on that one, although the cause of such desire is still under fierce debate.I think there is an interior desire to know the One who made us, even by those who deny His existence. There is a desire to understand the meaning of our own existence.
Well, for me, certainly, but not for everyone. For certain personality types, self-denial and submission is easier than autonomy.it also requires self denial and submission. That is a difficult demand
Remember that Jesus is the Word of God and therefore it’s the Word of God that the Holy Spirit is sent to help us. God will use both to bring people to salvation. His people then should stay in the Word through Bible Study and the Sacraments. We who know the Good News should be the ones sharing the Word.And so do we hear this truth *directly *from the Holy Spirit, without *any *human medium, or do we, as Lucy107 said, hear it via people?
Unfortunately, the Church has included many different voices pretty much since its inception, and we are thus obliged to decide which of those voices we consider to be the ones speaking God’s truth, i.e., we have to decide which people to trust.
The behavior of Christians. A Christian can hurt as much as non-Christians. We see that in our parish.So what are the reasons you hear that people have a negative view of the faith?
I concur. It may be unfair but the bad that a Christian figure does will be amplified more. It is a matter of perception.Agreed, especially when the hypocrites are media figures.
Since the church sets out to make people better, it has to face the fact that people can reasonably expect it to be better and can object when it fails to be so. One of the interesting figures which came out during the Catholic priests’ sex abuse scandal (and please don’t anyone derail this discussion into claims about how many things others did wrong, too) was that the rate of sexual abuse was higher in US high schools than in US Catholic churches. People were still more upset with the priests because they had expected more from them, and were thus more disappointed.
And you have heard about this from whom?So So wrong. Jesus left us the Church and send the Advocate the Holy Spirit to bring us to the truth.
The Holy Spirit is not people, the Holy Spirit is God who speaks through his Priests in the RCC.
And the Apostles got it straight from the mouth of God. It is what he told them that they teach us. We don’t trust people, we trust God and his word in sending the Holy Spirit to protect his Church.
Awww. Don’t try to twist this.So non theists have no standards? If they do what are they based upon?
Are you stating non theists hold themselves to a lower standard of behavior because they are not theists?