Why the bible is most assuredly not a Catholic book,

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hisalone
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well based on this new discovery that the Bible is really Jewish and not Catholic, I propose we give a pile of dirt the same rights as humans since that is what Adam is made of.

And who says dirt can’t think like us. I mean silence is the begining of wisdom. That is wiser than humans that actually believe that the Bible is Catholic.

My goodness, to think that the Bible is Catholic.

It is like saying women aren’t the same thing as a Tony Roma’s rack of ribs.
 
Pro_Domina said:
Well based on this new discovery that the Bible is really Jewish and not Catholic, I propose we give a pile of dirt the same rights as humans since that is what Adam is made of.
Click to expand...
Where you been? Never heard of Earth Day?😛

Can’t pray in school, but we can worship dirt.
 
Jesus diddnt want any non-jew having a part of his teachings. He said that you should not throw dogs food. Divinely correct as he was, he was shamed by the woman begging him to heal into doing so simply by her admitting her tribe were dogs and that they ate the crumbs from the table.
He cant have been too convinced by his own commands.

To reinforce his xenophobia, he also said “I have been sent but to the children of israel”. Not the* children of Leeds*, the children of Israel.

Straight from the gaffer.
 
Just tell me which New Testament book teaches Orthodox Jewish teaching with absolutely nothing that would offend a practicing Jew.
 
Hisalone said:
The bible is Gods book to mankind entrusted to the Jews and followed by men of good will worldwide despite their religious affiliation.
Catholics have tried to replace Jews as Gods chosen people—heresy.
Now they want to claim the Jewish book as their own. Pretty petty behavious in my opinion.
Click to expand...
Weren’t you the one “mumbling” something …er I mean “complaining” about Catholics “flagrant abuse” of the rules regarding that “agenda” thingy???
 
tommiatkins said:
Jesus diddnt want any non-jew having a part of his teachings. He said that you should not throw dogs food. Divinely correct as he was, he was shamed by the woman begging him to heal into doing so simply by her admitting her tribe were dogs and that they ate the crumbs from the table.
He cant have been too convinced by his own commands.

To reinforce his xenophobia, he also said “I have been sent but to the children of israel”. Not the* children of Leeds*, the children of Israel.

Straight from the gaffer.
Click to expand...
The gaffer? My that chip is larger than I thought.

Ah, the wonders of selective editing. The women started calling on him as Son of David. As a Gentile, who is David to her? You also leave out that the Disciples explicitly asked Him to send her away, but He did not. When she addressed Him as Lord (which any Gentile could do), then He answered her, and healed the daughter as she requested. For the reason, look at John 9:3.

How you interpret His sitting with the Samaritan women?

Back to the Syrophoenician: the is a story of St. John Maximovich, when he was in Brazil (I think, it could have been California) a Russian Orthodox told a Russian Jewess about St. John. The Jew’s son was sick, and being somewhat a “natural pietist” was willing to try anything for her son. So she went to a talk where St. John was speaking. She didn’t want the Russian priest to know that they were Jews, so when she asked him, she said “please pray that my son Misha (Michael, an extemely common Russian Orthodox name) will get well.” “I will pray for Moishe (Moses, the boy’s real name)” St. John replied. And the boy did recover.
 
Isa_Almisry said:
Ma, he’s thrown the baby out.

Have you read the history of the development of the constitution? Going to drop that too?

Have you ANY idea of the nastiness that goes on between scientists (I went to a research school, the one with the most Nobel prizes. You’d be shocked)? Are you going to not avail yourself of the marvels of modern medicine and technology?
Click to expand...
The difference between the Constitution and scientific theory are that neither claim to be either (a) divinly inspired, or (b) inerrant. Thus, IMO, your argument is a fallacy.

I realize you mean well, but to be honest with you , I’m not worried about this and don’t feel you should be either. I won’t try to change your mind if you’ll return the favor. 🤷
 
Mannyfit75 said:
Disciple and pratices differ from the Catholic Church in the first century. However, the belief which is not defined remain consistent. Everything concerning faith and moral remain the same.

The expression of faith. First of all it is the Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. History disproves your mere opinion.

The Early Church had bishops, priests, Liturgy, and the belief of the real presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist. They also believed that in the Divine Liturgy, the entire community of the Church (the faithful) part take the sacrifice of Jesus Christ in an unbloody manner.
Click to expand...
The 1st century church was devoid of pagan practices and customs. There was no Marian doctrine, no papal infalibility on purgatory all later add ons which have distorted Christian practice and thought.
 
Mannyfit75 said:
Christianity today isn’t the same as in the First Century. Back the first Christians were Jewish and spoke Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, and even Latin. However, in the beginning the Christian way of worship always was Liturgical and it was CENTERED on the Eucharist!
Click to expand...
They had no statues or icons, no prayers to Abraham or Moses. There was no papal infallibiblity, Marian doctrine. The list could go on and on.
 
Hisalone said:
They had no statues or icons, no prayers to Abraham or Moses. There was no papal infallibiblity, Marian doctrine. The list could go on and on.
Click to expand...
They had no doctrine of sola scriptura, no “faith alone,” no “once saved always saved”…
 
Hisalone said:
They had no statues or icons, no prayers to Abraham or Moses. There was no papal infallibiblity, Marian doctrine. The list could go on and on.
Click to expand...
Actually, I’ve been studying this quite a bit lately and historical evidence does appear to support that veneration of Mary and submission to the authority of Rome are very early doctrines (first few hundred years of the Church). As to satues and icons, those appeared in practice somewhat later - but the key issue there is whether they are objects of worship (they are not) or representations to assist in worship of Christ and the Father (which they are). The earliest examples of these are actually in the Hebrew scriptures (Cheribim on the Ark of the Covenant) and the brass serpant Moses created and had the Israelites look to at the command of God.

Blessings,

Brian
 
What about Catholic Jews? One doesn’t cease to be a Jew because he converts to the true faith.
 
It is very interesting to hear Bob Fishman ,Jewish convert to Catholicism speak about the very Jewish root Catholics have…The mass is filled with it according to him…

Never forget Pope John Paul called the Jews our elder brother in faith…the first mass was a passover seder…Christ redeemed us and that is all that is all that matters to me…
 
redrosetea said:
It is very interesting to hear Bob Fishman ,Jewish convert to Catholicism speak about the very Jewish root Catholics have…The mass is filled with it according to him…

Never forget Pope John Paul called the Jews our elder brother in faith…the first mass was a passover seder…Christ redeemed us and that is all that is all that matters to me…
Click to expand...
Indeed, Catholicism contains the fulfillment of Judaism’s promise from God…

And we shouldn’t forget that the grafted, adopted children of God can be removed from the olive tree - and too that the original branches will eventually be grafted back on.
 
Pier said:
Indeed, Catholicism contains the fulfillment of Judaism’s promise from God…

And we shouldn’t forget that the grafted, adopted children of God can be removed from the olive tree - and too that the original branches will eventually be grafted back on.
Click to expand...
Praise God 🙂

Blessings,

Brian
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top