L
Lampo
Guest
Care to say some by name?Many.
Care to say some by name?Many.
This one can!Are there any Catholics who can tell me what the New Covenant is???
A whole course on covenant and still he does not tell you what the New Covenant is. Amazing.This one can!
The Church at CorinthCare to say some by name?
Actually, the Bible is most assuredly a Catholic book. If it is not, how do you explain the following passages from the Bible?
**The institution of the papacy
Christ Church was built on Christ The Son of the Living God. Peter was a leader of the apostles but at no time is the office of the pope in scripture, it is contrary to scripture. The pope has attempted in the past to lord over them as the gentiles do. This is unbiblical.**
(Matthew 16:18 RSV) And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it.
(Matthew 16:19 RSV) I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
The Church as the pillar and ground of truth
Im a member of Christs Church Im not Catholic.
(1 Timothy 3:15 RSV) if I am delayed, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth.
Sacred Tradition
(2 Thessalonians 2:15 RSV) So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter.
Which letter was Paul talking of? It is the letters which became scripture
The salvific nature of baptism
(1 Peter 3:21 RSV) Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ,
God Bless,
Holly![]()
God entrusted His oracles to the Jews and then after them His people who were Christian.So, are you asserting that the BIBLE dropped down from heaven whole and intact into the hands of Christians??
CC
Did they all have different and competing doctrines? Were the bishops of these churches unified? What you’ve named here are the first diocese of the Catholic Church. Very well done.The Church at Corinth
The Church at Ethiopiia
The Church at Jerusaluem
The Church at Rome
The Curch at Ephesia
You took this course? If you did and still have questions, why don’t you email Dr. Hahn, I’m sure he’d respond and help clarify it for you. Have you ever considered that maybe it’s not the course and that it’s you who does (or is it do?) not grasp it?A whole course on covenant and still he does not tell you what the New Covenant is. Amazing.
Those were all Catholic Churches, under the authority of the Apostles (as witnessed by the fact that St. Paul, an Apostle, was sending them letters of instruction).The Church at Corinth
The Church at Ethiopiia
The Church at Jerusaluem
The Church at Rome
The Curch at Ephesia
Hisalone If you think CW is wrong why dont you look it up.I already told you the correct answer. If my answer does not line up with your falwed understanding of the Scriptures, it isn’t my fault.
Hisalone Is not a bad guy he is just very cofused,I think he a pencyestal that left the Cathloic Church and now has a well lets say grip with the Chrush and well not agree with any tihng the Church teachingjust say a lot of prays for him ,he does need helpWe should all step back and aknowledge that hisalone follows himself alone and not Christ. We are talking about an uneducated person (obviousely) with a skewed view of reality who is not here to learn, but to spoil this sight with ignorance, hate and lies! I am just being blunt not rude! Every Catholic here has done well to give correct and informative advise to him though it is clear that is not what he is here for! His hate is starting to taint others and it is in our best interest to disregard him. We know that we are right and we did a good job reaching out to his lost soul, however you cannot help those who do not wish to be helped! I prapose to disregard him and his un-christ like intentions!
Pope is a made office…an office made by Jesus…He called 12 disciples. After Judas Iscariot died. Peter…the head of the Apostles at the time…said “let another take his office”(Acts 1:20). Then they nominated two others, Barsabbas(Justis) , and Matthias. Then they drew lots, and the lot fell to Matthias.(Acts1:20-26). If there was not an “office” then why did they elect someone to replace Judas? That’s because there was an “office” that needed to be filled.Jesus never ever set Peter as pope. I can conceed that Peter was a leader of the apostles which is a far cry from pope. Pope is a made office. It is an office which has cased much disunity in Christs Church.
I work for a person for 15 and we called him the CEO,and later he was called the pres. of the bank… so like Peter he did it all. Peter was never call a pope but he is doing what Our pope is doing now feeding he sheep,Now that may be hard for you to understand but most people that can think for them self will be able to understand take your time and try to learn a little,you are here to learn,RightPope is a made office…an office made by Jesus…He called 12 disciples. After Judas Iscariot died. Peter…the head of the Apostles at the time…said “let another take his office”(Acts 1:20). Then they nominated two others, Barsabbas(Justis) , and Matthias. Then they drew lots, and the lot fell to Matthias.(Acts1:20-26). If there was not an “office” then why did they elect someone to replace Judas? That’s because there was an “office” that needed to be filled.
Do you really think that Jesus would leave his church without a leader? That would be asking for Chaos! Just like a CEO leaves a trusted person in charge of his organization when he leaves, Jesus left Peter in charge of the Church. He gave him the “keys to the kingdom”. Jesus did not do that for any other disciple. Getting the Keys to the kingdom references OT scripture that says that the Prime Minister would get the “Keys to the Kingdom”. Peter was the Prime Minister. He was the first among the Apostles. When he spoke, the others fell silent and agreed to what he said.
CC
Covenant: A sacred Agreement, a formal pledge based on Love that binds two parties together with obligations on both parties - it is relational - it has a ritual action.At least look it up, its not that hard. Then you will know for all time.
The New covenant is clearly laid out in scripture:We should all step back and aknowledge that hisalone follows himself alone and not Christ. We are talking about an uneducated person (obviousely) with a skewed view of reality who is not here to learn, but to spoil this sight with ignorance, hate and lies! I am just being blunt not rude! Every Catholic here has done well to give correct and informative advise to him though it is clear that is not what he is here for! His hate is starting to taint others and it is in our best interest to disregard him. We know that we are right and we did a good job reaching out to his lost soul, however you cannot help those who do not wish to be helped! I prapose to disregard him and his un-christ like intentions!
"When supper was ended, he took the cup.I find it very telling that no one here could tell me wat the New Covenant is.
"Take this, all of you, and drink from it:
This is the cup of my blood, the blood of the new and everlasting covenant.
It will be shed for you and for all, so that sins may be forgiven.
Do this in memory of me."'"
What is very telling as that you have absolutely know knowledge on covenant theology. You have been told what it is, but you reject it because it does not match your bad theology. Whats more, you won’t tell us what you think it is. Possibly because you fear that we will be able to refute it.I find it very telling that no one here could tell me wat the New Covenant is.