Why would anyone want to be a Mormon or Jehovah Witnesses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheSufi
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You are entitled to your opinion, obviously; but I disagree.
actually, it is fact.

It has been proven that Joe was a false prophet.

How much proof would you like us to present?

I posted some the versions on a different thread so you can come show us how there are not contradictions
 
I have read them. There are major contradictions. Glad you can pick the one that best fits your belief.

Catholic alter their lives based on the Scriptures.

It appears Mormons alter their scriptures based on their lives
You are mistaken. This site contains a harmony of the various accounts. It shows that there are omissions from the different accounts, but not contradictions.
 
Good. It is rare a Mormon will admit they have no reason, just blind faith. I am glad you are different and admit there is no reason behind your belief
There is a reason, and it is not blind faith. The reason is the testimony of the Holy Ghost.
 
You are mistaken. This site contains a harmony of the various accounts. It shows that there are omissions from the different accounts, but not contradictions.
Actually, the site you provided shows plenty of contradictions, but does not include all the versions. So, go to the thread and show us how there are no contradictions
 
That is one possible meaning of “reason”. A more general meaning is simply justification for action or belief. Here are some definitions form the Free Dictionary:


  1. *]The basis or motive for an action, decision, or conviction. See Usage Notes at because, why.
    *]A declaration made to explain or justify action, decision, or conviction: inquired about her reason for leaving.
    *]An underlying fact or cause that provides logical sense for a premise or occurrence: There is reason to believe that the accused did not commit this crime.
    *]The capacity for logical, rational, and analytic thought; intelligence.
    *]Good judgment; sound sense.
    *]A normal mental state; sanity: He has lost his reason.
    *]Logic A premise, usually the minor premise, of an argument.

    See definition number 1. My justification for belief and action is the testimony of the Holy Ghost that it is true. That is my “reason”.

  1. Usage Note::
    A traditional rule holds that the construction the reason is because is redundant, and should be avoided in favor of the reason is that. The usage is well established, however, and can be justified by analogy to constructions such as His purpose in calling her was so that she would be forewarned of the change in schedule…
 
in mormonism, the father and son are human beings. is the holy spirit a human being? is the holy spirit a physical being? where did the holy spirit come from? the son is procreated by the father, but what is the holy spirit’s origin? when was the holy spirit created? is there a separate holy spirit for every heavenly father?
 
There is a reason, and it is not blind faith. The reason is the testimony of the Holy Ghost.
I did not say “a reason”…I said “reason”

You may have “a reason” but not “reason”

here endeth the lesson
 
I beg to differ. Many ex-Mormons will tell you otherwise. From they tell me: ALL LIES!
Would you judge Catholicism by the testimony of Catholic apostates who have left the Catholic Church and now find fault with it from the sidelines?
 
I didn’t say that. I said the reason is the testimony of the Holy Ghost.
Nope! Here are your own words verbatim:

No “reason” is required; or the faith itself is the reason. The witness of the Spirit becomes the reason.

You like your notorious Joe are endless contradictions.
 
There is a reason, and it is not blind faith. The reason is the testimony of the Holy Ghost.
Fine. My testimony of the Holy Ghost proves to me, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that the Mormon church is a cult.

Prove me wrong. How are you right, and I am wrong, if the same Holy Spirit provides testimony to both of us?
 
Can’t prove a negative. What we CAN show is that nothing in the Book of Mormon has ever been corroberated by non-lds scientists, geographers, archaeologists, or any other “ists”.,
That is not proof that it is false.
 
You didn’t answer my question. Science has proven that the Book of Mormon is NOT what Joseph Smith said it was; therefore Joseph Smith lied.
The answer is still the same. There is no science that can prove the Book of Mormon false.
How is the Book of Mormon true for you?
By the testimony of the Holy Ghost.
 
That is not proof that it is false.
Sure it does. Joe Smith said that very certain things happened at very certain times, and it’s been proved that they’ve not happened at all.

Ergo, Joe Smith was either completely misinformed, or a liar down to his very bones. I suspect it’s probably a little of both.
 
There is a reason, and it is not blind faith. The reason is the testimony of the Holy Ghost.
Yes, it is blind faith otherwise you could complete this sentence: I have a testimony for the truth of the Book of Mormon because _____________. And the blank would be filled with an objective fact.
 
Why does have it to be “serious” to be acknowledged as having contradictions? Major or minor…there exists contradictions.

BTW: Prophets do not have false visions by God. OT prophets were not liars!
Joseph Smith was not a liar either. His vision is true. The differences do not amount to contradictions. They are simply different accounts given at different times (mostly orally) with different amounts of detail.
 
The answer is still the same. There is no science that can prove the Book of Mormon false.
Yes, DNA has proven Joseph Smith to have lied about what he said was true about the Book of Mormon.
By the testimony of the Holy Ghost.
That is not an answer.

I believe it is true that the Book of Mormon is a 19th century document.
I believe it is true that the Book of Mormon is a work of American fiction.

How do you believe the Book of Mormon is true?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top